Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

737-800 Heavy in Barcelona

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

737-800 Heavy in Barcelona

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 13:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: snu
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737-800 Heavy in Barcelona

Why is B737-800 considered as a Heavy type Aircraft in Barcelona?
Any ideas?

is it anywhere eles in the world? I only realized it in BCN.

thanks
speedbird37 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 15:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure why. I think they also put the B752 in th Heavy cat aswell.

C
Casper87 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 20:43
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 46
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 757 is considered HEAVY in Germany as well.
eagleflyer is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 21:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Walking the dogs along the Thames
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Denmark the 757 is considered Heavy as far as the aircraft behind it is concerned. But considered Medium with regards to the aircraft in front of the 757.
Complicated? Oh yes
MorfArsenal is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 21:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 757 is according to the MTOM in the medium category. However due to the strong wake it produces it is considered heavy for the following aircraft.

The 737-800 as heavy? That's just a mistake of Spanish ATC.
If I'm correct, a 738 is indicated as 73H on the radar screen. The 'H' stands for '8', but some Spanish controllers mix it up with the heavy suffix.
I once heard the same mistake being made in Lanzarote.

Last edited by Bus Driver Man; 23rd Jul 2011 at 22:01.
Bus Driver Man is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 22:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canarias, Spain
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It´s not a mistake of ATC, in Spain the authorities have stated the 737-800 as Heavy. It has always been like that.

Another thing: we don´t see that type of aircraft as 73H, but as 738, so that could not possibly mistaken us.

I think it´s the only country where the 737-800 is considered Heavy, don´t ask me why.

Best regards.
Sonnendec is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2011, 15:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnendec
It´s not a mistake of ATC, in Spain the authorities have stated the 737-800 as Heavy. It has always been like that.

Another thing: we don´t see that type of aircraft as 73H, but as 738, so that could not possibly mistaken us.

I think it´s the only country where the 737-800 is considered Heavy, don´t ask me why.

Best regards.
My mistake on the 73H then, but I remember reading something about it.

Then it must be a mistake from the authorities.
According ICAO it should be medium category.

Doc8643 - ICAO Aircraft Type Designators
Bus Driver Man is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2011, 15:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then it must be a mistake from the authorities.

It is not a "mistake" it is a difference filed by the Spanish Authorities.
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2011, 17:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But the question remains why?
What about the 737-900?
Bus Driver Man is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2011, 18:07
  #10 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What about the 737-900?
Why not look it up?
 
Old 24th Jul 2011, 20:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: MC80 Home One type Star Cruiser
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently not.

Country Rules and Regulations according LIDO:
WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION
B757 and B737-800 when leading ACFT are considered as H.



Ok, I was wrong about it being a mistake by ATC or the authorities, but it doesn't make sense that a 738 is considered H, while the 739 isn't.
It doens't make much sense to me that a 738 is considered H in the first place.


However, doing some PPRune research, I was able to find this:
http://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/202...-category.html
But, it only applies to ATR, Dash-8 and similar aircraft.
Bus Driver Man is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2011, 20:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Spain
Age: 49
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
738 in Spain will NOT be considered Heavy anymore since next month, we just got the info. Was considered heavy when leading for wake turbulence separation.

757 is still considered heavy when leading.
Akhorahil is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2011, 21:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canarias, Spain
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct. I saw it today at the control room: since july 31st the 737-800 will ne considered M also when leading.
Sonnendec is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 03:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The world's most liveable city
Posts: 245
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
So a B738 departs at 2359 on Jul 31. What time can you launch the next departure?
RAC/OPS is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2011, 07:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, it would be fun if the next departure is exactly a 737 800. Medium behind heavy, that's what would be applied. But it's between the same type!! (Actually it's the same when we have a 757 behind a 757 in some countries)

Going back to the 737 800 sequance a smart controller would delay the first one just enough to make it become medium and expedite air traffic flow with the next departure
rallymadness is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 10:48
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think if you go into the JEP SUP and look at category of aircraft, because at max weight the B737-800 approaches at 142kts, it makes it a CAT D aircraft.
In europe however i think everyone operates it as a CAT C as it is on the actual change over limit of speeds for CAT C/D, but in the US I think it can still be categorised as CAT D.
Could that have something to do with it?
jayc004 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 12:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: On a different Island
Age: 52
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
o a B738 departs at 2359 on Jul 31. What time can you launch the next departure?
Zulu or local time?
Blockla is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2011, 13:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@jayc004, one is an approach speed category and the other a wake turbulence category. Two different things that do not have all that much in common.
Denti is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 00:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, if this was 2009, for a salary of 300,000 Euros (and more) , i'd put wake turbulence spacing behind a 738 as well

Thenoflyzone
TheNoFlyZone is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.