Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

LEPA (Palma) slot complaints.

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

LEPA (Palma) slot complaints.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jun 2011, 18:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,251
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
LEPA (Palma) slot complaints.

Not found this anywhere else, so, here goes....

We had a slot inbound to Palma this morning with a short delay and arrived in amongst a flurry of arrivals that suggested a small delay outbound. This led to us getting a 1/2 hour delay and receiving the ATIS info that taxy time was 25 minutes. There seemed to be a few crew who were unhappy at not being given start clearance with only 20 or 15 minutes before the start of the slot 'window'. The 'debate' went on a while but left me wondering why the slot allocation system from Brussels seems so much different in Palma from other airfields. Is it something to do with the taxying times?

Any ideas?
blue up is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 14:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Around the world.
Age: 42
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is my understanding that Palma are on a work to rule, so whilst the -5/+10 could usually be used by the pilots, at Palma and Arrecife they will not let you depart -5 or +10 at your convenience, only theirs.

The upshot is many times I have had to call for push way too early with the fake 15 or 25 minute taxi time or whatever fiction they come up with, then waited at the hold with two burning and turning for 10 mins waiting for the exact slot time to arrive.

I have asked them and they tell you the -5/+10 is for them and not for us. Either way I hate flying to PMI with a passion.
tom775257 is online now  
Old 12th Jun 2011, 19:19
  #3 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If true, these guys need to remember that the 'S' in ATS stands for 'SERVICE'. Either provide it, or get another job.

That said, the 15 minute window is indeed for ATC use, but if a controller has it available and can use it to ensure a safe, orderly, and EFFICIENT flow of air traffic, then they are not very professional if they play petty games with their customers.
10W is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 06:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NeverLand
Age: 24
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys, for what I gather from other vineyards you're barking at the wrong tree.

The thing is last year's campaign against the spanish ATCO from the spanish gov included hundreds of disciplinary actions for...well...everything. Even contradictory ones at that. One of the big ones derived in an internal note to all staff acusing them of overloading sectors because traffic was deviating from established routes, therefore not being where they should when they should (according to the ideal of a computer system, that is). They were also being blamed and accused, at the same time, for delays in the system (which will be sorted by allowing directs and expediting the ops).

Lose/lose situation no matter what you do. I do not think ATCO's in Spain hate your guts nor are they trying on purpose to make your life hell, but I really believe they have their hands tied, at least as long as the same incompetent management is in place (as opposed to the new incompetent management that will take over at some point). the problem lies at the persons behind the steering wheel, not in the engine room. To make matters worse provider, regulator and government are all one and the same dog with different collars. And the thing in mind is to privatise airport$$$ before they run out of time (elections, which this gov is going to lose for sure, should be next spring and rumour has it there's talks of even making them earlier, this november).

Happy landings,
A.
andrijander is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 07:28
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,251
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks, Adrijander, but that doesn't really explain the loss of the -5 to +10 minutes on a slot that everyone else in the world uses. Difficult for pilots to plan their departure when the rules are kept hidden. If someone could state what the rules are for Palma then we'd be able to comply with them but it seems that nobody has written them down.
blue up is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 09:11
  #6 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
andrijander

I agree there are many examples where Spanish controllers have been treated really badly by 'management' and the Government.

However, unless they have decreed that following published and accepted Eurocontrol rules regarding the 15 minute slot tolerance is illegal, then I think you have a good case for doing what every other ATC in Europe does. If they won't let you comply with what Eurocontrol wants and allows, then you should let Eurocontrol know that a Member State is breaching the rules and forcing its controllers to do so as well. The argument about overloading other sectors is flawed, because there will always be a small element of overload possibility with a 15 minute window. It is not an exact science due to this. If the overloads are being caused by people ignoring the slot window, then that's a different issue and one which should be tackled.

Saludos
10W is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 14:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Flight plan route", not sure how many times I heard that today!! What exactly is that achieving, apart from burning more fuel
How does flying the route you planned burn MORE fuel?
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 15:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Walking the dogs along the Thames
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does flying the route you planned burn MORE fuel?
Well said Sir
MorfArsenal is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 17:34
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,251
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I think he is correctly refering to the standard request for a shortcut/'direct' instead of the zig-zag airways routing so common in europe. 'Direct Girom' has been consigned to the history books, it seems.
blue up is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2011, 21:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Irishpilot.

If you cannot pose a question properly don't complain when you are asked for clarification.

I have no need to prove my "smarts"

I refer to fuel really required,
Then why didn't you SAY so.

Your costing a needless 300-600 KG on an average flight that could be saved.
Ex PMI/LEPA I am costing you nothing. As a UK controller I will do all I can to save you track miles and fuel. IF however I were a Spanish controller in dispute with my employer and (as has been mentioned by colleagues above),the ANSP seems ready to fall upon any indiscretion by the ATCO ,I have to say that my job/livelihood/families standard of living trumps your upset at having to pull the flaps in raise the gear and settle down to doing the Star quick crossword for the next 2.5 hours whilst your jet flies itself to wherever you are off to on any given day.

I do however care about the price of petrol in my car
Which has f eck all to do with ATC.

And your also not proving your worth what your paid.
Ooh seems like a nerve may have been touched and that may in fact be the basis of your complaint.
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 06:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or maybe they've all just read this?

EUROCONTROL - Flight Plan & ATFCM Adherence
Gonzo is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 10:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably true Gonzo. However, any airport that uses heavy category wake turbulence sequencing behind a common 738 (not an A321 though) is somewhat wacky, same about the taxi times and slot adherence.
Denti is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 10:29
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: guess where...
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the link Gonzo, that is the one reason indeed.

In any case, if I have on my plate many more planes than I can safely handle, then the least thing I would want is to make things more complicated by granting shortcuts. Everybody as per flight plan route, at least there I know where the conflicts are.

I really think some pilots are losing their perspective. In 2010 there were 1085 incidents reported, 47 of them near-misses. I'm aware most of you would think that spanish Atc is as close to professional excellence as a bewildered duckling to relativistic quantum mechanics but these were the same professionals that also ensured your safety in previous years without such a dreadful record.

And now sector capacity has been increased, single man operations enforced and minimum horizontal distance reduced.

Which leads me to ask a question... would you rather arrive to your funeral 5 minutes earlier or rather make it out in one piece.

And another question, just for bonus. Does anybody think spanish atcs are happy with this situation and not aware that they are maintaining safety by the skin of their teeth?

Fly safe and good luck, we might all need it.
Daermon ATC is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 10:32
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: guess where...
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
any airport that uses heavy category wake turbulence sequencing behind a common 738 (not an A321 though) is somewhat wacky,
Not been much to Spain, have you?

B738 is defined by spanish aviation authorities as medium when flying after a plane and as heavy when flying before.

Spanish atcos enforce the rules, they don't create them.

And if you think spanish aviation authorities are somewhat wacky, my point precisely.


Let's not forgett that DGAC, AENA and AESA, which should be independent are in fact all branches of the same ministry.
Daermon ATC is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 21:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Enroute to sand.
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ eastern wiseguy

I dont read the star or do the star crossword

My point about fuel costs and even price of petrol is we are wasting fuel that need not be used with a bit of professionalism. Everyday you hear pilots requesting a FL higher then filed, they are being professional and doing their bit to save oil, a finite resource.

ATC constantly saying flight plan route and not allowing higher, to try to prove a point achieves nothing...except as you identified..hit pilots nerves. Do the Spainish goverment or airline managers care that its annoying for aviators....hell no. So no point taking it out on us. Were only trying to be professional.

I speak about Spain not UK control, UK do their very best. My point in one line is pissing away this fuel everyday will do NOTHING to achieve better standards/safety/rest/leave/money or whatever else it is the spainish are complaining about.

Spainish have not helped themselves either being some of europes best paid and yet holding the reputation of being worse then the french for striking! That is an achievement!
irishpilot1990 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 21:11
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Enroute to sand.
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Daermon ATC
Not been much to Spain, have you?

Spanish atcos enforce the rules, they don't create them.

And if you think spanish aviation authorities are somewhat wacky, my point precisely.


Let's not forgett that DGAC, AENA and AESA, which should be independent are in fact all branches of the same ministry.
What about giving us the RVR when its CAVOK??

The one I love is "wind 250@2 kts, varying 210 to 270", , maybe it is the french that do that?
irishpilot1990 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 23:07
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@all discussing about taxi times: Look at this:
https://www.public.cfmu.eurocontrol...._dataset_info=

Example for LEMD:
Link: https://www.public.cfmu.eurocontrol...._dataset_info=
TAXI TIME LEMD
Valid from : 2011-06-14
Valid until : 2011-06-14
Released : 2011-06-14 17:25:43
TACT/CASA INFORMATION MESSAGE
.
1 REF : TAXI TIME LEMD
.
2 VALID : WEF 14-18:00 UNTIL 14-19:00 UTC TAXI TIME 25 MIN
.
3 REMARK : CTOT FOR FLIGHTS DEPARTING IN THE ABOVE PERIOD
WILL BE CALCULATED ACCORDING TO THE NEW TAXI
TIME AND SLOT REVISION MESSAGES MAY BE ISSUED.
.
CFMU - BRUSSELS
I donīt really know the background, but maybe somebody can explain for what reason quite a strong number of airports are publisihing these "taxi time in xxxx today" reports almost daily with different minutes for taxi.....
foxyankee is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2011, 15:32
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spain
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Why is not the Slot concept change? And what I wanna mean is nothing but this: if I have a slot at 10:20 meaning I can take off between 10:15 and 10:30, why they just don't give me the slot for 10:15 and then everyone knows the window will be open up to +15 min? If there is a "secret" reason for the -5+10 I would be glad to hear it!
FeuerDrachen is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2011, 13:51
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NeverLand
Age: 24
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Irishpilot1990,

"I refer to fuel really required, i.e the figure when pilots and ATC do their job professionally. Professionalism includes being efficient. Management budget for planned fuel so they dont care and laugh at pilots fustration. We have no say in protest. "

I'm guessing which airline you fly for if you have no say/can't protest for the planned fuel. Which leads me to point 2:

"My point about fuel costs and even price of petrol is we are wasting fuel that need not be used with a bit of professionalism. Everyday you hear pilots requesting a FL higher then filed, they are being professional and doing their bit to save oil, a finite resource."

You may see it as being responsible, but many times these "concerned pilots" are just trying to cheat the system by filing one level to avoid a CFMU restriction and then asking for another, once in the air, to fly cheaper (pun intended). Now, I understand it is better for the environment but these people do not care for what/how needs to be done from the ATC point of view.

So if these people don't care about ATC's problem, why should ATC care about theirs/yours?

(and by that I mean walking the extra mile...or rather cutting it).
andrijander is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2011, 01:55
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canarias, Spain
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello,

Letīs explain it again: the 15 minutes tolerance when a CTOT is issued is for exclusive use of ATC, and ONLY in case there is a sequence (more than one traffic waiting for departure). When you are alone at the holding point with your CTOT under your arm you WILL have to wait until the exact time to take off.

Now, was there much more flexibility time ago? FOR SURE, and we loved it as much as you do. But we were not threatened by our own management as we are now. Did you folks know that AENA refuses to investigate any report about sector overloads or incidents if the ATC have not complied with this rule or has given any direct route? Did you know that AENA blames controllers for the airspace congestion for giving shortcuts? Did you know that we have to deal with "imaginative" new sectors without having any training on them? did you know that we have, in one of the new wonderful laws made for us this year, fines to up to 4.5 MILLION euros if we screw it? did you know that AENA management rises sector capacities as they see fit without ANY safety study (FHA)? did you know that we are working under such political pressure that these "overpaid" and "privileged" workers are starting to leave the job? did you know that more controllers than you would imagine are under psichiatric treatment because of this pressure, and still, they have to go to work anyway?

Guess how many days did i rest last july? Make your bet.

Did you know that on the 1st of july, one of my colleagues (and a good friend also), married/two children, one of the best controllers i know, is leaving to go to work in IRAQ? Come on guys, when you prefer to go to Iraq rather than to stay in your "overpaid" job, something is going on. If you dont want to see it, too bad. Your lifeīs on the scale...
Sonnendec is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.