Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

How relevant is a planning controler?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

How relevant is a planning controler?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Aug 2010, 11:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: guess where...
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy How relevant is a planning controler?

Just read an article in an aviation magazine (I can not link where as per site norms) stating that AENA (spanish NSP) is considering to get rid of the planning controlers to increase economic eficiency.

Now the article goes on pointing out that this would be asking for another crash like the one at Ueberlingen. I take that this is probably an exageration as things are nowadays a bit tense at the spanish ATC and likeminded media, but I would welcome some other opinions on this issue.
Daermon ATC is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2010, 14:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: EHAA
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't want to do without..
Surferboy is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2010, 15:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That sounds like the article author doesn't understand that planning or 'delivery' controllers are just normal controllers doing one of a number of positions. However, I think what the ANSP in Spain is after is a form of datalink which could, in the future with some tweaks, render the delivery position redundant thus reducing the number or controllers in the long term. However, having worked with datalink I think it's a fair way away...
DAL208 is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2010, 18:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Surrey
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was the author writing about a 'planning controller' in the area or aerodrome sense? Two very different roles carried out by controllers with very different ratings.
shrimp42 is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2010, 19:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that whoever came up with this suggestion is not, (and probably never has been), an area radar controller, or a ground movement controller.
He/she probably has qualifications in accountancy/management.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 07:17
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: guess where...
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@DAL208 Datalink is currently used only in the Canary Islands but not mainland Spain. As you say, I think it is the way to go but still "In a Galaxy far, far away".

@Shrimp42 This change is proposed to affect ACC controllers.

Apparently the justification (which I have no doubt is considered valid by an accountant) is that there are already single-position ACC controllers throughout Europe, used mainly on night-shifts and/or in sectors with reduced capacity.

The fact that Ueberlingen was a night shift springs to my mind, but apart from that I wonder if some ACC controllers here have had this type of work at their workplace and if it is safe.
Daermon ATC is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 08:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(and probably never has been), an area radar controller
Could be you eh Zooker?
250 kts is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2010, 13:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: France
Age: 55
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what the ANSP in Spain is after is a form of datalink which could, in the future with some tweaks, render the delivery position redundant
As it's (more and more) all about economic efficiency, redundancy becomes obsolete and useless in aviation.

The Spannish ANSP seems to have taken good decisions in the way of economical efficiancy during the last few years.

Last edited by BrATCO; 31st Aug 2010 at 19:07.
BrATCO is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2010, 19:45
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Knots, Greetings.
Nah, Accountancy and 'Management' have never been my bag. More of a physical sciences type really. - (Oh, and spotting, naturally).
In fact I'm very interested in the 'Caledonian Terrane' that Mr Cartman lives on.
Rock On Eric!
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2010, 15:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: the ground floor
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure it depends totally on what type of control you're doing and how busy the sectors tend to get, but from the point of view of a (stripless) UAC in busy airspace, it would be total chaos without planning controllers. We wouldn't be able to have anywhere near the sector capacities we currently have.

How are you supposed to be able to coordinate with other sectors as well as talk on the frequency with anything more than a couple or few aircarft in your setor?

I do actually have to coordinate with an adjacent sector which has an "on call planner" policy, and am frequently left hanging on the phone waitinng for the controller to finish speaking to the aircraft. Fine if its not urgent and/or you're not busy yourself. But when you have 5 other calls to make, its causing workload for us as well as them.
bids is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2010, 02:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here in "world's best practice" TAAATS land, there is only ever one person to separate/coordinate/communicate - and in my group it's normal to have up 18 aircraft before you start splitting airspace... most times the 18 are beautifully spaced, all on rails, and it's no problem - other times, a 2nd set of eyes would be very useful, but not always available
undervaluedATC is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2010, 14:07
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canarias, Spain
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

AENA is trying to eliminate the planning controller in ANY sector ANY time in the day (not only night shifts) regardless the complexity of the sector or traffic density. No FHA, no safety study, just economic and profit priority.

OŽLeary is the new #1 fan of the actual AENA (dis)management...
Sonnendec is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.