Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

NATS Farnborough and Swanwick TC - Adjacent sectors but different buildings

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

NATS Farnborough and Swanwick TC - Adjacent sectors but different buildings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jul 2010, 17:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NATS Farnborough and Swanwick TC - Adjacent sectors but different buildings

Hello there,

A while ago NATS moved staff from Manchester to Prestwick to fulfill their master plan of "4 buildings into 2".

David Harrison said: "What [the move] is going to allow us to do is give us a bigger and better environment and new technology and platforms to operate from."

One thing I don't understand: Farnborough LARS operates in coverage areas adjacent to several TC sectors in London, yet the building which houses these ATCers are kept separate to Swanwick.

Could I ask what was the reasons for having two separate buildings, instead of having all the guys sit next to each other, maybe for purposes of co-ordination?
soaringhigh650 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 17:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheaper.
nats Farnborough is a much lower pay band.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 17:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't even think about Northolt!!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 18:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, you mean that military unit within the London CTR which is permitted to reduce Class A separation standards to those which would cause a civil London CTR ATCO to lose his licence?
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 19:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something like that.....
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 19:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its not like Farnborough LARS is a "centre" itself, seperate from any airport or area centre. The LARS's are delivered from the radar room at Farnborough Airport alongside the approach radar controller for Farnborough (infact a lot of the time its bandboxed). The ATCOs providing the LARS's are also qualified to control in the tower at Farnborough. The room they control from would be there anyway so no problem really!

Like someone said before, instead of NATS paying band 5 ATCOs to provide the LARS from Swanwick, NATS can pay band 1 ATCOs (who also double up as tower controllers) to provide the services. Its kind of two for the price of LESS than one if you see what I mean.
twentypoint4 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 12:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,816
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
On an ATCO staff course I did in '86, Swanwick was still in the planning stages and we were told it would include 10 'FIR Radar' positions to replace LARS units; wonder what happened to those? Probably cheaper to get assistants wiith FISO (Area) licences to do the FIR I suppose.
chevvron is online now  
Old 22nd Jul 2010, 14:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London FIR
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, you mean that military unit within the London CTR which is permitted to reduce Class A separation standards to those which would cause a civil London CTR ATCO to lose his licence?
That's because we would not be able to operate otherwise


Don't even think about Northolt!!
Funny you say that HD, when the planning stages were going on Northolt were put forward as an option for providing part of the service. However the money that was being offered, coupled with the issues Brize Radar were experiencing knocked that one on the head.


MM
Monkey Madness is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2010, 09:24
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,816
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Providing only part of the service would have ruled Northolt out. For the service to be effective all 3 sectors needed to be housed under one roof with the controllers interchangeable and hence the sectors (North/East) bandboxable.
A new NATS service, Western Radar, this time middle airspace, was recently started by NATS. I've heard no reports of it but I believe this one is being done from CTC Whitely rather than Swanwick.

Last edited by chevvron; 23rd Jul 2010 at 11:17.
chevvron is online now  
Old 23rd Jul 2010, 19:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So much for the 'two-centre strategy' then.
ZOOKER is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.