Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Government Shareholding in NATS to be Disposed of

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Government Shareholding in NATS to be Disposed of

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jun 2010, 17:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am a little confused not to mention worried to some extent with regards to this. So the government wants to sell the shares that it holds within NATS (either all or part of them).

It seems like if it does happen, there will be a lot of changes to everything from Ts and Cs to pension and eventually to service provision i think. Lets just hypothetically say that "a company" comes in and the first thing they do is change the Ts and Cs to go in line with all the employees and they then start with the pensions too and then eventually move on to service provision and possibly safety.....etc. i think there will be a lot of staff looking to become controllers elsewhere. it could leave NATS embarrassingly with no staff at all.

privatisation hasn't helped with projects around NATS struggling to get them complete in both ops rooms and all this as traffic is slowly getting busier and the olympics looming over the horizon. What will the new buyer do when it finds out how much money has been spent on these projects that are yet to see the light of day in the ops room?

If the pension is altered again or our Ts and Cs are changed......i think i will be looking at other ANSPs i think.
Conspiracy Theories is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2010, 19:26
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Box Hill or Bust
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Union rules state that if the govt announces a sale of the rest of it's shareholding (or part of) then the union shall ballot for industrial action. It's there in the standing orders, there's no way round it (unless members vote to give it up). Each member needs to let their rep know what they want to happen should the govt push the plan further, rather than bleating about what has gone before and fighting amongst ourselves.
Not quite true, Section A3 3.1 (xii) of the Branch handbook stated that "The BEC shall ballot members for industrial action should the Government announce that it is to sell off its remaining stake in NATS".

However, Motion 5 at Conference 2009 "Conference instructs the BEC to lobby Department of Treansport and Industry to allocate a portion of any future sale of shares by H M Govt for the exclusive purchase by NATS staff.", was passed and the procedural attached to this motion was the deletion of A3 3.1 (xii).

So it appears there is no such manadate.
Hooligan Bill is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2010, 20:04
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunny Warwickshire
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's always the option of a special delegates conference to determine policy on this issue should enough of the membership feel it appropriate and call for one
radar707 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2010, 10:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hooligan Bill
Not quite true, Section A3 3.1 (xii) of the Branch handbook stated that "The BEC shall ballot members for industrial action should the Government announce that it is to sell off its remaining stake in NATS".

However, Motion 5 at Conference 2009 "Conference instructs the BEC to lobby Department of Treansport and Industry to allocate a portion of any future sale of shares by H M Govt for the exclusive purchase by NATS staff.", was passed and the procedural attached to this motion was the deletion of A3 3.1 (xii).

So it appears there is no such manadate.
Hopefully that would be shares with full voting rights??? Otherwise it's just a bribe!
call100 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.