Government Shareholding in NATS to be Disposed of
 

Chancellor announced in Budget that Government Shareholding in NATS to be disposed of.

Had to happen eventually!!

Anyone got a few million spare?

Not much of a surprise, been on the cards for a while.
The question is, who wants it ?
The airlines are strapped for cash & given a chance, The Airline Group would sell their shares too.

I'm sure there's a private equity firm, with a short term view, out there somewhere. We do have some assets worth stripping.

Awesome, bring on making money in a non profit making organisation.

I feel safe already :mad:

Ummm???????

The pension fund for a start ....

Yeah, that'll be the only reason anyone wants to buy us.

Anybody seen that dry powder anywhere? Remember that stuff? Anybody? Hello?..

:hmm:

Any new owners of NATS would only be entitled to take any pension contribution surplus that they have accrued and I do not believe that the Civil Aviation Authority Pension Scheme (NATS Section) is in surplus.
I would think however that in the event of a takeover the right of existing employees to be members of the CAAPS would be under great threat.

The dry powder blew away in a light breeze when 30% of members couldn't be arsed voting one way or another to stop our pensions being changed.
Todays announcement was widely expected but it was the only line in the budget that made me wince.
It's probably downhill from here as far as our Ts and Cs are concerned:mad:

<<< It's probably downhill from here as far as our Ts and Cs are concernedhttp://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/sr...s/censored.gif >>>

No change there then from way way back.

Don't bank on Prospect
 

No doubt the "union" will rage against this. But as seen in the past the Union is very similar to a chocolate teapot and as much use.

Turnout for the last Unite/BASSA vote was 71% - wonder if they're still going on about the 29% who "couldn't be arsed"?

The Budget document states in the section "Asset Sales" that

"as part of a wider programme of asset commercialisation over the next 12 months the Government will:

• explore with other shareholders the options for a potential sale process in NATS".

As a shareholder, I look forward to being consulted.


Budget 2010 .pdf

Who would buy into a company that was not for profit? Unless of course the goal posts were to be moved again.

One option: a stock market flotation?
 

I think you mean "verb" - present, continuous, active!

2 s

I was told by a trustee of the IAL pension Scheme that SERCo only bought IAL because of it's pension scheme; he was on 'gardening leave' (minimum pay after a job in the middle east)due to his refusal to let SERCo get their sticky fingers on the money!!

The Union is only as strong as it's members. If they are chocolate can't be arsed members then don't blame the organisation.....Having been through what you are about to go through, my condolences for your T's & C's. Your pension will end up being a lot less than you had planned for....Unless of course there are not so many chocolate warriors out there and you are prepared to fight for them.:hmm:

The Union rules state that if the govt announces a sale of the rest of it's shareholding (or part of) then the union shall ballot for industrial action. It's there in the standing orders, there's no way round it (unless members vote to give it up). Each member needs to let their rep know what they want to happen should the govt push the plan further, rather than bleating about what has gone before and fighting amongst ourselves.

Was that the same standing order that said if they tamper with the pension fund then they ballot the members?:hmm: