UK Airspace closure
Adam: Not Heathrow; CAA Directorate of Airspace Policy have decreed no SVFR clearances allowed in class A airspace.(the SVFR man seems a bit miffed about it)
Did somebody say 'Northolt'?
Did somebody say 'Northolt'?
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The airspace isn't closed - there is a zero flow rate in operation.
Had a very nice glider pilot ask me today if he could overfly KK today as we were so quiet, why the hell not I thought and Tower agreed. You see fuzzy6988 we can accommodate VFR traffic in the control zones in London
Had a very nice glider pilot ask me today if he could overfly KK today as we were so quiet, why the hell not I thought and Tower agreed. You see fuzzy6988 we can accommodate VFR traffic in the control zones in London
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South West England
Age: 73
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the airspace is open but with a zero flow rate does that mean that traffic from outside the CFMU area can enter the airspace subject to clearance of course?
A I
A I
ICAO convention (can't remember which one) states that no IFR clearance into an area of forecast volcanic ash may be given.
2 s
StandupfortheUlstermen
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My WM had a bugger of a job finding the ICAO 'Volcanic Ash Contingency Plan'. Scanned through it meself, dry old reading I tell you.
Dear god, SKY have a special on at 20:00 tonight titled 'BRITAIN GROUNDED'
Desperate amount of eejits on the news all day, one said 'but the sky out there is clear, it's disgraceful that we aren't allowed to fly out!'
Oh, must go, Eric Moody's 3,214th TV appearance today is on.
Dear god, SKY have a special on at 20:00 tonight titled 'BRITAIN GROUNDED'
Desperate amount of eejits on the news all day, one said 'but the sky out there is clear, it's disgraceful that we aren't allowed to fly out!'
Oh, must go, Eric Moody's 3,214th TV appearance today is on.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2 Sheds, no, I didn't mean the Convention, but a convention:
convention noun 1 a large and formal conference or assembly. 2 a formal treaty or agreement. 3 a custom or generally accepted practice, especially in social behaviour.
I was referring to the ICAO Volcanic Ash Contingency Plan but momentarily forgot the proper term.
convention noun 1 a large and formal conference or assembly. 2 a formal treaty or agreement. 3 a custom or generally accepted practice, especially in social behaviour.
I was referring to the ICAO Volcanic Ash Contingency Plan but momentarily forgot the proper term.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: behind the fruit
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
have noticed that on nats.co.uk (temporary reduced to a basic single page due to heavy web traffic) we are now "The UK's leading Air Navigation Services Provider", and not a World Leader in Air Traffic Management anymore.
Must have been a tough one to win over the UK competition of the en route services to become the UK leading ANSP!!
Must have been a tough one to win over the UK competition of the en route services to become the UK leading ANSP!!
A couple of queries from me:
While flying today we were refused a Traffic Service from a number of agencies as there was no IFR. However, according to CAP 774 -
"Traffic Service is available under IFR or VFR and in any meteorological conditions."
So, the implication is that VFR traffic are not worthy of a Traffic Service or controllers are confused over when various services can and should be offered.
Was SVFR really unavailable? If so, why? As a helicopter operator my colleagues and I regularly require SVFR clearance to enter London and other controlled areas. Bear in mind helicopters operate at the lower levels, where I suspect risk of volcanic ash is low. If the risk is not low, then can the ash cause damage to our cars/lungs etc?
While flying today we were refused a Traffic Service from a number of agencies as there was no IFR. However, according to CAP 774 -
"Traffic Service is available under IFR or VFR and in any meteorological conditions."
So, the implication is that VFR traffic are not worthy of a Traffic Service or controllers are confused over when various services can and should be offered.
Was SVFR really unavailable? If so, why? As a helicopter operator my colleagues and I regularly require SVFR clearance to enter London and other controlled areas. Bear in mind helicopters operate at the lower levels, where I suspect risk of volcanic ash is low. If the risk is not low, then can the ash cause damage to our cars/lungs etc?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long White Cloud
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@ Paul Chocks
It was probably a mixture of both with reference to the Traffic Service, although they certainly couldn't argue the fact they were too busy to give it....
I've never seen the radar screen so empty, even France was quiet.
It was probably a mixture of both with reference to the Traffic Service, although they certainly couldn't argue the fact they were too busy to give it....
I've never seen the radar screen so empty, even France was quiet.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paul Chocks, there seems to have been quite a lot of VFR traffic out there this afternoon so if the unit you were in contact with had many calls, your service would be downgraded due workload. Other reasons are that you may have been flying in an area where lots of others were flying and that painted returns on the radar but weren't in contact. You may have been too far from the radar head for a radar service to have been provided. Some units (ie NATS enroute) cannot provide a radar service below FL70 outside controlled airspace.
Now what's the implication?
Now what's the implication?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hither and Thither
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Farnborough LARS were saying they were unable to provide anything other than Basic Service for most of the afternoon. It did not appear to be workload or coverage issues, but rather that they had been told from 'higher up' not to. I wander what the rationale for that was?
NOTAM C1919 refers:
"DUE TO THE RESTRICTIONS APPLIED TO THE PROVISION OF RADAR SERVICES
CAUSED BY THE VOLCANIC DUST CLOUD PASSING OVER THE UK, FARNBOROUGH
RADAR CAN ONLY PROVIDE A BASIC SERVICE, ISSUE A VFR CLEARANCE AND
CANNOT OBTAIN CLEARANCE TO ENTER CONTROLLED AIRSPACE.
FROM: 15 APR 2010 13:10 TO: 15 APR 2010 21:00"
NOTAM C1919 refers:
"DUE TO THE RESTRICTIONS APPLIED TO THE PROVISION OF RADAR SERVICES
CAUSED BY THE VOLCANIC DUST CLOUD PASSING OVER THE UK, FARNBOROUGH
RADAR CAN ONLY PROVIDE A BASIC SERVICE, ISSUE A VFR CLEARANCE AND
CANNOT OBTAIN CLEARANCE TO ENTER CONTROLLED AIRSPACE.
FROM: 15 APR 2010 13:10 TO: 15 APR 2010 21:00"
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You see fuzzy6988 we can accommodate VFR traffic in the control zones in London
Only class A airspace is closed due to no IFR clearances being allowed; all other airspace classifications are still available to VFR traffic.