Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

UK Airspace closure

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

UK Airspace closure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Apr 2010, 15:50
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does that mean that we can come do touch and goes at Heathrow in our spamcans?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 15:59
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: solent-on-sea
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As long as you can avoid controlled airspace requiring IFR or SVFR clearances, knock yourself out.
Not Long Now is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 16:13
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,816
Received 96 Likes on 69 Posts
Adam: Not Heathrow; CAA Directorate of Airspace Policy have decreed no SVFR clearances allowed in class A airspace.(the SVFR man seems a bit miffed about it)
Did somebody say 'Northolt'?
chevvron is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 16:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fresh from the Desert
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hehe! Northolt closed!
Plenty VFR types out and about in Warwickshire.
Sucking in all that talc!
Wonder what the next overhaul bill will look like!
Sand Devil is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 16:40
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Age: 45
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The airspace isn't closed - there is a zero flow rate in operation.

Had a very nice glider pilot ask me today if he could overfly KK today as we were so quiet, why the hell not I thought and Tower agreed. You see fuzzy6988 we can accommodate VFR traffic in the control zones in London
Vortex Issues is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 16:44
  #26 (permalink)  
A I
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South West England
Age: 73
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the airspace is open but with a zero flow rate does that mean that traffic from outside the CFMU area can enter the airspace subject to clearance of course?

A I
A I is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 17:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ICAO convention (can't remember which one) states that no IFR clearance into an area of forecast volcanic ash may be given.
I don't think you mean the ICAO Convention! But that is still rather misquoting ICAO procedures.

2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 17:17
  #28 (permalink)  
StandupfortheUlstermen
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My WM had a bugger of a job finding the ICAO 'Volcanic Ash Contingency Plan'. Scanned through it meself, dry old reading I tell you.

Dear god, SKY have a special on at 20:00 tonight titled 'BRITAIN GROUNDED'

Desperate amount of eejits on the news all day, one said 'but the sky out there is clear, it's disgraceful that we aren't allowed to fly out!'

Oh, must go, Eric Moody's 3,214th TV appearance today is on.
Standard Noise is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 17:30
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So can any of you learned people tell us why no SVFR please?
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 17:34
  #30 (permalink)  
StandupfortheUlstermen
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Er, no. Don't understand that one myself.
Standard Noise is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 17:39
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 Sheds, no, I didn't mean the Convention, but a convention:

convention noun 1 a large and formal conference or assembly. 2 a formal treaty or agreement. 3 a custom or generally accepted practice, especially in social behaviour.

I was referring to the ICAO Volcanic Ash Contingency Plan but momentarily forgot the proper term.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 17:55
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<Desperate amount of eejits on the news all day>>

And on here too!!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 18:00
  #33 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One ray of sunshine, AMAN has been 100% correct this afternoon in providing EATs

BD

Last edited by BDiONU; 15th Apr 2010 at 18:23. Reason: added missing e
BDiONU is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 18:49
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London FIR
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Northolt was very much open
Monkey Madness is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 18:49
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: behind the fruit
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
have noticed that on nats.co.uk (temporary reduced to a basic single page due to heavy web traffic) we are now "The UK's leading Air Navigation Services Provider", and not a World Leader in Air Traffic Management anymore.

Must have been a tough one to win over the UK competition of the en route services to become the UK leading ANSP!!
LEGAL TENDER is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 21:10
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: varies
Age: 55
Posts: 39
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A couple of queries from me:


While flying today we were refused a Traffic Service from a number of agencies as there was no IFR. However, according to CAP 774 -

"Traffic Service is available under IFR or VFR and in any meteorological conditions."

So, the implication is that VFR traffic are not worthy of a Traffic Service or controllers are confused over when various services can and should be offered.

Was SVFR really unavailable? If so, why? As a helicopter operator my colleagues and I regularly require SVFR clearance to enter London and other controlled areas. Bear in mind helicopters operate at the lower levels, where I suspect risk of volcanic ash is low. If the risk is not low, then can the ash cause damage to our cars/lungs etc?
Paul Chocks is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 21:57
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long White Cloud
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Paul Chocks

It was probably a mixture of both with reference to the Traffic Service, although they certainly couldn't argue the fact they were too busy to give it....

I've never seen the radar screen so empty, even France was quiet.
OA32 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 22:14
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Paul Chocks, there seems to have been quite a lot of VFR traffic out there this afternoon so if the unit you were in contact with had many calls, your service would be downgraded due workload. Other reasons are that you may have been flying in an area where lots of others were flying and that painted returns on the radar but weren't in contact. You may have been too far from the radar head for a radar service to have been provided. Some units (ie NATS enroute) cannot provide a radar service below FL70 outside controlled airspace.

Now what's the implication?
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 22:30
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hither and Thither
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Farnborough LARS were saying they were unable to provide anything other than Basic Service for most of the afternoon. It did not appear to be workload or coverage issues, but rather that they had been told from 'higher up' not to. I wander what the rationale for that was?

NOTAM C1919 refers:
"DUE TO THE RESTRICTIONS APPLIED TO THE PROVISION OF RADAR SERVICES
CAUSED BY THE VOLCANIC DUST CLOUD PASSING OVER THE UK, FARNBOROUGH
RADAR CAN ONLY PROVIDE A BASIC SERVICE, ISSUE A VFR CLEARANCE AND
CANNOT OBTAIN CLEARANCE TO ENTER CONTROLLED AIRSPACE.

FROM: 15 APR 2010 13:10 TO: 15 APR 2010 21:00"
Red Four is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2010, 22:31
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You see fuzzy6988 we can accommodate VFR traffic in the control zones in London
Nice one! I never said you guys couldn't anyway!

Only class A airspace is closed due to no IFR clearances being allowed; all other airspace classifications are still available to VFR traffic.
I thought volcanic ash affects visibility? So one might request an extra pair of eyes to help separate them from other traffic in time of need? Hmmm.....
fuzzy6988 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.