Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

No landing clearance on short final

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

No landing clearance on short final

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Dec 2009, 15:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No landing clearance on short final

You are expecting a late landing clearance but someone is blocking the frequency, hence you don't receive the clearance in time. Or you lose communication on approach. What would you do?
housecarl is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 15:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you want what a pilot would do......or what I as a controller would expect?
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 15:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you don't receive the clearance...What would you do?
Is there a choice of options other than GO-AROUND?
Is the status of Runway Occupancy known?
Is this a trick question?
Or a little joke?
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 16:50
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No tricky, Personally I think when loss of com. visual, and you can assure yourself there is no traffic on the runway, landing might be an option rather than make a go-around. You still have to shot a new approach with no com. or I'm I wrong?

Reason for asking is because this happened today, the aircraft concerned was cleared to land but did not receive the message, (don't know the reason) and they executed a missed approach. They where back on frequency during the go-around.

In situations like this when according to normal traffic flow you (as pilot) are expected to do something but the message is not received, like cleared ILS approach for example. What do you expect/prefer?
housecarl is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 18:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the wireless...
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the aircraft concerned was cleared to land but did not receive the message.........and they executed a missed approach
If the crew did not receive the message then they did not receive the clearance in which case a missed approach is the only option. A missed approach must be anticipated on every approach.

you can assure yourself there is no traffic on the runway, landing might be an option rather than make a go-around.
How can you "assure yourself there is no traffic on the runway" ??? It would need an ASSUMPTION. ASSUME and aviation safety is not compatible. ASSUME makes an ASS out of U and ME.
How do you know for certain that , for example, AFS has not been cleared for an emergency crossing, or the preceding aircraft has not fully vacated, or an aircraft approaching the runway has ignored a red stop-bar etc ??

What IS the point of having AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL if you are going to DO-IT-YOURSELF ?? To land without ATC clearance whatever the crew's 'perceptions' is unjustifiable except in an emergency or when following radio failure procedures. The crew cannot possibly know the surface traffic situation.
Talkdownman is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 18:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMC or VMC?
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 22:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fife.UK.married,2 kids
Age: 75
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VMC/IMC doesn't really make all that much difference. No landing clearance = go around. Talkdownman explains why. The only exception would be if you were compelled to land and at that point perhaps some visual signal of distress ( remember them? ) might be appropriate. In any event if you land without a clearance make sure you have a good explanation ready.
Hyperborean is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 22:52
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 278
Received 65 Likes on 27 Posts
Housecarl, it doesn't matter whether the controller hasn't been able to give you a landing clearance, or whether there's a dead whale on the runway. You don't land. End of story. You go around. I've done so a few times, keeping the wheels off the runway while some idiot wastes my time and money, but that's it.
Gargleblaster is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 00:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Antipodes
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Every landing is an aborted go-around... No landing clearance = go around. End of story.

Loss of comms is a different story altogether. My Jepps state the following in the Emergency Section:

  • Squawk the appropriate emergency code and listen out on ATIS and/or voice modulated navaids.
  • Transmit Intentions and normal position reports. Assume Transmitter is Operating and prefix calls with "TRANSMITTING BLIND"
  • If practible, leave/avoid controlled/restricted airspace and areas of dense traffic. Establish visual navigation as soon as possible and land at the most suitable aerodrome.
In this case it comes down to the PIC on the day to make the call. If I were on short final and the radio suddenly fizzed without receiving a landing clearance, my initial reaction would be to go around, click the transponder over and try another approach. It all comes down to the situation...
PRD Area is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 02:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,677
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
No landing clearance = overshoot, please.
But also, have a look at the tower. I've lost count of the number of times this sort of thing has happened, I've shone a green light at the aircraft, and nobody thought to look, so it wasn't seen.
Admittedly, where I work, the tower is some distance away from the actual aerodrome.
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 10:42
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The answer you seek is in the title of your thread.

"No landing clearance on short final"
anotherthing is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 10:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tarq57.. Lucky you, still having Aldis lamps. Sadly, they were withdrawn from some major UK airports about 30 years ago.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 19:18
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wellington,NZ
Age: 66
Posts: 1,677
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
HD, I think they are still mandated by the regulatory authority.
Because not many are accustomed to using them or looking for the light, they don't get used much.
The younger controllers tend to not even think of using them. Fair enough, too, I guess. No-one ever seems to see the light, unless it's a training exercise.

Where they would be useful is this sort of case, where you have a simple clearance to pass in a hurry to an aircraft nearby and the frequency is jammed at the critical time.

In other cases of a/c comm failure, nothing to be lost by trying a cellphone.
Tarq57 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 20:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a control room with no radar...
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wonder if any of the younger pilots pumped out of these cadet schemes would even consider looking at the tower for light signals (or know they exist) ??

Edinburgh still has them .... that's a major UK airport !
Scott Diamond is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 20:54
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tarq57, we've not had one for years. Interestingly, if I remember correctly, we had a megaphone/loud hailer more recently then an aldis lamp!
Gonzo is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 21:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aldergrove has one and it has been used in anger.
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 21:44
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind You.....
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you intend to land on a runway without landing clearance, i suggest you go find an uncontrolled airport.
powerstall is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 21:57
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: brisbane
Posts: 407
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Recently had this occur in ypph and had to carry out a missed approach. The tower had shone a Steady Green however we were unable to discern that steady green from the multitude of other lights all visible at night on the perth skyline. As mentioned earlier, you are in controlled airspace so unless you are compelled to land and have declared an emergency you must go-round.
greenslopes is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2009, 22:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Used the good old aldis lamp yesterday. All ended well, although, as the acft was squawking radio fail on 5nm final, I was pretty sure he'd be looking for a light

The hardest bit was holding the green button in, light steady on the acft with one hand, whilst making calls to other acft (TWR/APP combined) and writing on strips with the other (dinosaurs, I know).

To the original OP, I concur with the suggestion to look for a green light. If TWR want to clear you, but due to frequency congestion and leaving the landing clearance a bit late etc can't, chances are they'll use the lamp (if they have one .... and are over 30!). Otherwise, you can check the "go round" box for that month
RAAFASA is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2009, 10:17
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know it's not correct that's why I raised the question. This was not a question of "DO-IT-YOURSELF" mentality. In this case the aircraft was no 2 for landing, the controller tried several times to give the clearance after the runway was vacated, the aircraft transmitted back they could not hear them.
How can you "assure yourself there is no traffic on the runway"
You can also change the question to how does the controller know for sure there is nothing on the runway. Of course you can't be 100% but every landing I try to assure myself there is "no dead whale on the runway", even if I have been cleared to land. team work.

Last edited by housecarl; 11th Dec 2009 at 10:35.
housecarl is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.