Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

IRVR and Absolute Minima (UK Only)

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

IRVR and Absolute Minima (UK Only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2009, 19:27
  #1 (permalink)  
niknak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IRVR and Absolute Minima (UK Only)

We have a Cat One ILS on one end and NDB approach on the recipricol runway therefore we have to apply Abslute Minima when the RVR dictates.

Our IRVR gives us a Touchdown and a Stop End (we dont have a mid point), MATS Pt 1 states that:

If only two values are to be passed, they are to be individually identified, e.g.
“RVR runway (designator) Touchdown 650 — Stop End 550 metres”.


But which is to be used to determine Absolute Minima?

I know that logic dictates that you should use the Touch Down reading and the pilot would use the Stop End for information purpose only, but does anyone know where this is written down in CAA Doc's?

Thanks.
niknak is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2009, 23:30
  #2 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm pretty sure that it's the TDZ - mainly because that's the only one that's required for Cat I and non-precision ops.

There was an ATSIN (no 19, I think) which I recall explained it all very clearly - but this is now withdrawn and I've never seen it incorporated in any other doc.
 
Old 18th Nov 2009, 20:54
  #3 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Have you sought clarification from your CAA ATS Ops Inspector? He or she would love to ponder such a question before referring it to the big grey building sat abeam LGW 26L

You could always send a Firefighter out to count lights in the old fashioned way or persuade the bean counters to buy a 3rd IRVR - or shut when it gets a bit murky.

'Course if the a/c on approach has EVS and HUDLS then let them get on with it.

The above is guidance not to be inserted in MATS Pt 2

Sir George Cayley
 
Old 19th Nov 2009, 19:26
  #4 (permalink)  
niknak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We await a reply from SRG.............
niknak is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2009, 22:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Mysterious East
Posts: 384
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't hold your breath!
LXGB is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2009, 11:52
  #6 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it is any help, EU OPS Table 6a in Appendix 1 (New) to OPS 1.430 (EUOPS) states that failure of mid, stop AND TD have no effect on Cat I ops, so either TD RVR or CONVERTED met vis would be acceptable. Stop end is not required.
BOAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.