UK - Approach or Radar on initial contact?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UK - Approach or Radar on initial contact?
I often talk to East Midland on 134.175. In my initial call I refer to them as 'East Midlands Approach' and they always seem to respond with 'East Midlands Radar'. Should I call them 'East Midlands Radar' with my initial call and when should I use the 'Approach' callsign and when should I use 'Radar'?
Cheers
RR.
Cheers
RR.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 24/7 Hardcore Heaven
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really think that most approach controllers are not that arsed whether you call them "Approach" or "Radar"...well, not those at TC anyway! Just so long as you call the right unit
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 20D DTY
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Technically EMA are a 'Radar Only' unit, and the controller will be sitting in front of a radar display, whatever you call him / her, but essentially, both respondents are correct - & we're not that bothered what you call us (within reason of course......
)
RC
)RC
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Technically
Aerodrome Control ------------------------ -- Tower
Ground Movement Control ---------------------- - Ground
Ground Movement Planning ---------------------- Delivery
Approach Control ----------------------------Approach
ATS Surveillance Services (in general) ---------------- Radar
However, an Air traffic control service is also set out as:-
b) Approach Control service, with or without the use of ATS surveillance systems;
But I reckon the convention is the former
Ground Movement Control ---------------------- - Ground
Ground Movement Planning ---------------------- Delivery
Approach Control ----------------------------Approach
ATS Surveillance Services (in general) ---------------- Radar
However, an Air traffic control service is also set out as:-
b) Approach Control service, with or without the use of ATS surveillance systems;
But I reckon the convention is the former
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely correct, mbcxharm, but not very helpful in this case, as both callsigns are listed for this frequency, see AD 2-EGNX-1-7
JD
JD
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Approach" or "Radar"
RR, back to your original question...
If you are IFR on handover, the preceding controller will normally give you the callsign as well as the frequency of the new unit, e.g. "G-XX, Contact East Midlands Radar 134.175", so the question you pose should not arise.
I guess, therefore, that your question relates to a freecall and probably for a service under VFR. I would suggest that, unless you know otherwise (i.e. from hearing a transmission prior to your inital call), your first contact should be addressed according to the service you require. For example, if it is a request for procedural service (such as a VFR join), then use "Approach" or if it is for a radar service (RIS/RAS or Radar Control Service), then "Radar" would be more appropriate.
As was confirmed earlier by RC and others, I'm sure controllers will not mind which callsign is used to address them on initial contact, as they are usually able to offer either service. However, your choice may just serve as a useful initial indication to them as to which service you may be seeking.
JD
If you are IFR on handover, the preceding controller will normally give you the callsign as well as the frequency of the new unit, e.g. "G-XX, Contact East Midlands Radar 134.175", so the question you pose should not arise.
I guess, therefore, that your question relates to a freecall and probably for a service under VFR. I would suggest that, unless you know otherwise (i.e. from hearing a transmission prior to your inital call), your first contact should be addressed according to the service you require. For example, if it is a request for procedural service (such as a VFR join), then use "Approach" or if it is for a radar service (RIS/RAS or Radar Control Service), then "Radar" would be more appropriate.
As was confirmed earlier by RC and others, I'm sure controllers will not mind which callsign is used to address them on initial contact, as they are usually able to offer either service. However, your choice may just serve as a useful initial indication to them as to which service you may be seeking.
JD
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the rain
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About hand-offs, when I flew into EMA London TC would invariably hand us off to "East Midlands Approach" who would invariably answer us as "East Midlands Radar". Same thing in Birmingham, though a few TC controllers called them radar.
So should we use the callsign mentioned in the hand-off or the one we know we will be answered with?
S.
So should we use the callsign mentioned in the hand-off or the one we know we will be answered with?
S.
So should we use the callsign mentioned in the hand-off or the one we know we will be answered with?
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South West
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Using the correct callsign for the ATC unit ensures that the ATCO is confident that the pilot understands the level of service that is being provided. This is really more important in the Tower, where in the most extreme cases pilots have been known to take off or land without clearance, under the impression that the unit is FISO or Air-Ground rather than ATC. ("xyz information" rather than "xyz tower"). Any unit that you're contacting will (or should) correct you on initial contact if the callsign is wrong, and that's the callsign you should subsequently use. Many Airports only operate Radar for limited amount of time in any 24hr period and their callsign will change as appropriate. (Hence the possibility of confusion with neighboring Units). The level of service that you require is not relevant to the callsign, however it should be noted that just because you're speaking to a Radar unit it doesn't mean you'll get traffic information. (Unless you require a Radar service, but that's another matter)
Long winded perhaps, but hope it helps
Long winded perhaps, but hope it helps
Last edited by zounds; 2nd Dec 2008 at 18:02.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cardiff, UK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I may be entirely wrong on this, but I believe that the approach control suffixes are as follows:
Approach - Procedural Approach Control
Radar - Approach Control with the use of ATS surveillance systems
Director - Approach Control for arrivals only with the use of ATS surveillance systems
There are several exceptions to this rule (like I believe IOM use "Approach" even though they have a ATS surveillance system but this is due to a limited service due terrain, etc) but most follow the convention above.
Approach - Procedural Approach Control
Radar - Approach Control with the use of ATS surveillance systems
Director - Approach Control for arrivals only with the use of ATS surveillance systems
There are several exceptions to this rule (like I believe IOM use "Approach" even though they have a ATS surveillance system but this is due to a limited service due terrain, etc) but most follow the convention above.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spit Dear chap
Are you saying that we are not even approaching the half way stage, and there is still no satisfactory consensus visible on the radar?
Or are you saying that there is such a consanguinity between approach and radar that in effect the two are as one and as such could be addressed by the same callsign
Are you saying that we are not even approaching the half way stage, and there is still no satisfactory consensus visible on the radar?
Or are you saying that there is such a consanguinity between approach and radar that in effect the two are as one and as such could be addressed by the same callsign
Using the correct callsign for the ATC unit ensures that the ATCO is confident that the pilot understands the level of service that is being provided. This is really more important in the Tower, where in the most extreme cases pilots have been known to take off or land without clearance, under the impression that the unit is FISO or Air-Ground rather than ATC. ("xyz information" rather than "xyz tower").
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely correct, mbcxharm, but not very helpful in this case, as both callsigns are listed for this frequency, see AD 2-EGNX-1-7
JD
JD
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But just re-read RR's original question, which was:
Should I call them 'East Midlands Radar' with my initial call and when should I use the 'Approach' callsign and when should I use 'Radar'?
JD
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madrid FIR
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Centre has just handed me an inbound B733 requesting an ILS. I am therefore providing an approach control service. So should my callsign be 'XXX Approach', to indicate to the pilot what function I am carrying out, or 'XXX Radar' to indicate I am using surveillance equipment to carry out the function? (After all, Tower and Ground use their callsigns to indicate their function, and do not change to 'Radar' when using ASMI). I also have three training Senecas in the hold. Since I can't use radar to separate them, should I talk to them using the callsign 'XXX Approach'. And I also have a low level military Puma below cover, just made a courtesy call and asked if I can get him Northolt's weather. Effectively he is getting a FIS. Should I now be 'XXX Information', and confuse myself by using three different callsigns at the same time?