Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Pensions?????????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 17:15
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 24/7 Hardcore Heaven
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed...and let's not even get started on Vision 2011...
mr.777 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 22:39
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
If NATS want to save more costs can I suggest they close down all departments involved in customer service?
Lets face it NATS biggest customers save millions through shoddy customer service, why not take a leaf out of Ryanair or BA's book?

And, back to the topic......
Del Prado is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2008, 08:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: home
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have it on good authority the union membership are pretty much on board with management now on this issue - the big challenge is to persuade us mortals to accept the change (hence the new number appearing on our payslips showing how much NATS have contributed to CAAPs - all part of a propaganda campaign to make us feel grateful). No doubt we can look forward to large bungs....

Prospect are not in bed with management on the matter by any means. So far as the number appearing on the payslip I am almost certain that was PROSPECTS/STAFF request and not management.
BwatchGRUNT is offline  
Old 5th Jul 2008, 20:48
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my garden shed
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
two companies (NERL/NSL) means two lots of managers, additionally the multitude of newly created managerial/directorship non-jobs : get rid - save cash!
hold at SATAN is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2008, 10:17
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Union Reps are not in agreement with NATS on their wish to close the scheme. They have acknowledged there is an issue that requires action to resolve... that's very different.

Generally, on the predictable comments about how the company could start by not having awards nights/conferences/initiatives etc etc... Come on... They could save more money by not paying for fully-furnished gyms, plasma screens and subsidised restaurants in Swanwick. you have any idea how much those contracts cost us each year? I don't see any suggestions of closing those...
Doing things to engage and reward staff is a good thing. It doesn't come free but if you get suitable engagement and increased performance from it then it's worthwhile. There's an attitude of resentment from some people about any money spent that doesn't go directly in their pockets... It's nothing to do with whether it's the right thing to do or not. The company is financially healthy... The threat to the pension scheme is not because cost cutting is required.
Me Me Me Me is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2008, 12:02
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my head
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by poi098
... (hence the new number appearing on our payslips showing how much NATS have contributed to CAAPs - all part of a propaganda campaign to make us feel grateful). ...
Is the number a cumulative career total (I've been in a few final salary schemes and never seen that before on a payslip) or is it just how much they've put in this month? (don't think I've seen that on a payslip either).

If it's a cumulative total not just a comparison with the deduction which is the employee's own contribution, it surely implies some line may have been crossed. Very few employers have admitted that pensions contributions are historically a contracted part of the employee remuneration package. If it is shown on a payslip it surely is tantamount to admitting it is an integral part of the employment contract?

But the quid pro quo for the employer is surely as poi098 infers ... propaganda leading up to the day when 'negotiations' begin again in earnest ... or did they never cease ?
slip and turn is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2008, 15:25
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
quite simple, if they mess with our pension and pay they can have one of my validations back.... if everyone (the majority) went back to MUR, the company would be well and truly shafted.
the company seem to forget very quickly that most of us in AC centres do more sectors than we are contracted to do.
kinglouis is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.