"Airport elevation XX" feet, cleared approach"
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Euroville
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Airport elevation XX" feet, cleared approach"
Is what I think the phrase was going into Prestwick tonight. I queried the reason the airfield elevation was passed to me and was told "It's a new proceedure we have to do".
I am sure there is a very good reason for it, but my pea sized brain hasn't been able to come up with the reason, especially when it's printed on the approach plates.
I am sure there is a very good reason for it, but my pea sized brain hasn't been able to come up with the reason, especially when it's printed on the approach plates.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the phraseology section of MATS, it says:
"Descend on the ILS, QNH (pressure) millibars, elevation (number) feet."
Most units dont give the QNH and elevation and just "descend on the ILS".
(in the college of knowledge, we had to say it all the time when we cleared someone for the ILS - it got annoying, like you said, the pilot should know it, it is there on the chart)
(in the college of knowledge, we had to say it all the time when we cleared someone for the ILS - it got annoying, like you said, the pilot should know it, it is there on the chart)
Perhaps Prestwick has been told for some reason to start doing it?
Just a guess...Correct me if I am wrong
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just a courtesy for those who land on QFE.common practice around eastern med,turkey and most subcontinent airfields, to be told airfield elevation by controllers.just a reminder that may or may not be of any info.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Box Hill or Bust
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This may have something to do with the publication of ATSIN 104 Change To UK Altimeter Setting Procedures :- Link below
http://www.caa.co.uk/application.asp...detail&id=2766
http://www.caa.co.uk/application.asp...detail&id=2766
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To get around not having to say the airfield elevation on the RT a number of Units transmit it on the ATIS. I've always thought it a nonsense here in the UK and yet another waste of valuable RT time better used elsewhere. The elevation is after all published on the approach plates and one assumes aircrew are quite capable of looking at that.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Euroville
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
‘Aircraft are to be given the appropriate QNH prior to commencing an approach. When requested by the pilot, or local procedures require, the appropriate QFE or aerodrome / threshold elevation shall be given.’
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like the boys and girls of Prestwick need to re-read the ATSIN (along with a couple of posters here 
)
.
If the pilot didn't request it, and I doubt there's a good reason for putting it in as a local instruction (we don't - and we're higher) why were they giving it?
)
Aircraft are to be given the appropriate QNH prior to commencing an approach. When requested by the pilot, or local procedures require, the appropriate QFE or aerodrome / threshold elevation shall be given.
If the pilot didn't request it, and I doubt there's a good reason for putting it in as a local instruction (we don't - and we're higher) why were they giving it?
Last edited by Chilli Monster; 6th Jun 2007 at 09:18.
StandupfortheUlstermen
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe my poor fuzzy brain has missed something here, but why did they give the 'airfield elevation' and not threshold, assuming of course, that Telstar was flying the type he has stored in his profile and not a chopper?
I were always taught to give threshold for runway landers and airfield for 'off runway' landers ie helos with skids.
I were always taught to give threshold for runway landers and airfield for 'off runway' landers ie helos with skids.
In years gone by, the majority of pilots in the UK used QFE on final approach, and ATC TX'd (or were supposed to TX!) the elevation to those relatively few pilots that elected to remain on QNH. Over the past 20 years or so, the use of QNH by public transport operators in UK airspace has gradually become almost universal, and the majority of ATCOs abbreviated their TXs accordingly. ATSIN 104 gives official acknowledgement, but MATS does not yet reflect this.
I don't understand the rationale of passing elevation with QFE (see post #5). Passing elevation with QNH is not really an error (see post #9), but ATSIN 104 suggests to me that it is no longer required, unless requested by the pilot etc.
I don't understand the rationale of passing elevation with QFE (see post #5). Passing elevation with QNH is not really an error (see post #9), but ATSIN 104 suggests to me that it is no longer required, unless requested by the pilot etc.
Last edited by spekesoftly; 6th Jun 2007 at 10:28.
There is NO rationale in passing aerodrome/threshold elevation and QFE. SRG got it wrong and when attcked by numerous people about the wording of the ATSIN, cancelled and replaced it. The worrying aspect is why did they get it wrong in the first place, it's not a difficult concept!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Box Hill or Bust
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UK AIP ENR 1-7-3 para 5.3.4 still states "The threshold elevation of each instrument runway that is 7 ft or more below the aerodrome elevation is given at AD 2.12. The barometric pressure setting to be used for landing on such a runway will be passed by ATC as QNH . . . . threshold elevation . . . . ,
or QFE . . . . threshold . . . . ."
Thefore irrespective of what the ATSIN says in these cases the threshold elevation should still be passed. However, this has always been the case and is therefore not a "new procedure".
or QFE . . . . threshold . . . . ."
Thefore irrespective of what the ATSIN says in these cases the threshold elevation should still be passed. However, this has always been the case and is therefore not a "new procedure".
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 43
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oddly enough the've ALWAYS done this at Prestwick going back to 1990 at least when NATs were running the show. I know because I was doing my O Grades at the time and got puzzled by the fact that the Runway 31 elevation was 66 ft ( it is now 65 ft I believe - is the country sinking we need to know? ) and the other end at 13 was only 38 feet. There didn't LOOK like a 28 ft disparity but I was only a school boy with an air band radio in those days.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thames Radar gives LCY traffic nothing....
Biggin Hill 21 arrivals get the threshold elevation (517'), and 03 arrivals get the aerodrome elevation (598') as it is a visual manouvre after a 21ILS.
Clear as mud then.......
Biggin Hill 21 arrivals get the threshold elevation (517'), and 03 arrivals get the aerodrome elevation (598') as it is a visual manouvre after a 21ILS.
Clear as mud then.......
