Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

CATC.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Oct 2006, 22:53
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know they have knocked down what used to be RAF West Drayton and are now building houses on it
Awww, jeez! Really? I'm going there for a course later this month. You mean to say I'll be wearing a hard hat for two days?
Gonzo is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2006, 06:12
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ops Monkey -

there used to be certain measures in place in case west drayton got knocked out when Swanwick did not exist. Certain Military units around the country were earmarked to be used to provide cover for the country

I am sure the same thing could be done again (using other assets instead of keeping West Drayton open at great expense)

Thw whole site is ear marked for housing.
anotherthing is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2006, 06:26
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anotherthing
I have heard that they want the 'prestige' of a Heathrow address - pity the students on ten grand that have to live near there!!
Would be a nasty commute for Hurn ATSAs posted up there, cos they sure as hell wont be able to afford anything more than a cardboard box in Tower Hamlets in the area...
Bev Bevan is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2006, 07:21
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to throw some more Avgas on the fire - don't forget that there's some prime real estate becoming available in the Prestwick area sometime in the near future that will include (amongst other things) a ready made Ops. room and more office space than even NATS managers would know what to do with

What you would loose in sunbathing time would be more than made up for by the excellent kite surfing weather...
Dunebug is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2006, 12:16
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kestral 909, there is a spare room where I live currently.

GBZ, near LHR is not my only home so no problem there, not my main home either really, although I have been up that way on and off since I started Uni in 1998.
747-436 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2006, 13:28
  #46 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ops_Monkey
This may be a bit OT but i overheard some mutterings that post 9/11 NATS were considering keeping west drayton alive on alert 5 (unmanned just ready to go) just incase someone decided to fly a jet into swanick and wipe out 54N and below causing choas in the air..
I know they have knocked down what used to be RAF West Drayton and are now building houses on it.. would be silly to put all ones ATC eggs in one basket without a standby once LATCC finally closes
Contingency is in place for all the ACC's and it doesn't include WD

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2006, 14:07
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kestrel_909
Got a spare room?

Something you want to tell me Chris?
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 08:32
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,831
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
So not only do NATS put LACC, LTCC and CTC on adjacent sites, but ATMDC is now to be co-located. And just one terrorist bomb threat occurs on the site; what happens? Just Imagine to coin a phrase!
NB NATS used to be ATS provider at Hurn, but I think they lost the contract in about '73, before most of you lot were born!
chevvron is online now  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 09:45
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1st April 1979 - contract taken over by IAL.
2 sheds is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 10:28
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chevvron, it would have to be a pretty big bomb to disable CTC and LACC at the same time! We're talking instant sunshine.....
Gonzo is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 10:50
  #51 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
So not only do NATS put LACC, LTCC and CTC on adjacent sites, but ATMDC is now to be co-located. And just one terrorist bomb threat occurs on the site; what happens? Just Imagine to coin a phrase!
NB NATS used to be ATS provider at Hurn, but I think they lost the contract in about '73, before most of you lot were born!
LACC and LTCC will be on one site CTC is on a different site about 3 miles (as the crow flies) away. I think you've got be pragmatic about the perceived terrorist bomb threat. What is the risk as opposed to how much more convenient it is to have all the support staff (CTC) in one area so you're not forever driving to different places for meetings?

There are also other issues which its not appropriate to discuss in an open forum (think about how exposed WD and the Ops room is!)

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 10:57
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find this news of Hurn’s demise sad and utterly bewildering! NATS has a good (be it old) facility at Hurn, in a great location, with good traffic links and accommodation and entertainment for visiting controllers, students and VIP’s. They now intend to spend an absolute fortune in moving the set-up to either the hell-hole of Whitely, or even further a field. A move to Heathrow would be madness and would be done solely for kudos.

From what I can gather, this so-called Centre of Excellence needs to look the part as well as carry out the function required. I’m sure many would agree that the building design and fantastic site location of Hurn is far more appealing than a face-less call centre style building at the CTC, or similar facility at Heathrow, Slough, Basingstoke ….

Why not re-build and invest in Hurn. It would be cheaper than moving and creating the chaos and mass-disturbance for the students, staff and customer units.

But heh, its’ just another crappy decision from the non-ATC suits in Fimble valley!

THE FREAK is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 11:02
  #53 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by THE FREAK
Why not re-build and invest in Hurn. It would be cheaper than moving and creating the chaos and mass-disturbance for the students, staff and customer units.
As I said in my previous post its much better to keep all the support staff in one area so there is less travelling and time wasted. Plus there is cost saving to be made with only one Facilities Management team required etc. etc.

If it were located at Whiteley how much more convenient that would be for AC and TC controllers participating in Real time simulations, little additional travel to the normal job.

If the Hurn site needs re-building then it could be built anywhere but may be more problematic at the existing site if there is no land to build on whilst still running the existing facility.

Hurn airport DESPERATELY need a new terminal so there may have been financial incentive, in addition to that of co-location, for NATS to move out.

Makes sound financial sense to my ATC support mind.

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 15:55
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BDiONU

Hurn already have planning permission for their new terminal and it is not on the CATC site.
mats3 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 18:26
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hurn does need demolishing due to asbestos.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2006, 19:35
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Locating CATC to CTC would enable current ATCOs to be involved in the early stages of training and I think that is important. How many times have we heard OJTIs say that they need to bring trainees out of the college world and into the real world?
I believe that in Germany college training used to be done in a similar way, i.e. trainees for Frankfurt are trained by valid Frankfurt ATCOs. (Don't know if it still is.)
.4
120.4 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2006, 07:42
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The world's biggest beach
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep this quite but i heard a rumour today that they were considering taking over the compass centre when BA move out.For what i hear you ask !! This is where NSL will do their training.
I leave this thought open for your wise comments
Errrr.... Where did you get this from ViaEGLL?

Where are BA going? Hurn
Yellow Snow is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2006, 07:49
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,831
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Compass Centre at Heathrow is built on the original site of? LATCC!!!

NB Lots of empty buildings around Farnborough, plus lots of space for purpose built complex.
chevvron is online now  
Old 8th Oct 2006, 08:57
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From BA Travelplan 05

T5 opens in Spring 2008, allowing us to consolidate our operations as opposed to operating from the three terminals we currently use. Our crew will report direct to T5, rather than to Compass Centre,
Conveniently situated for the NATS relocated staff to watch the construction of a new runway at LL and associated infrastructure, don't you think?
Suggestions for the next blindingly obvious move please?
161R is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2006, 09:07
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The World
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blindingly stupid move if you ask me. Pay the students 10k a year and then ask them to live/commute in West London. Nice!!!
Number2 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.