NDB approaches banned at LTN?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NDB approaches banned at LTN?
Luton's ILS is being calibrated so it is a case of SRA's at Luton today. The problem is that approaches are right on the limits at 2 miles visibility. Aircraft requesting a NDB approach are being told that they are now no longer allowed at LTN? Anyone know why?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This was late afternoon at around 17:00 with ATC informing aircraft that they were in error in offering a NDB approach earlier as they were no longer allowed at LTN. This message was passed on to more than one aircraft.
niknak
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't work there, but I can't see any reason why NDB approaches shouldn't be allowed unless it's more expedient to provide SRAs.
NDB approaches with DME usually have the same minima as a 2nm SRA.
NDB approaches with DME usually have the same minima as a 2nm SRA.
Could be due to the fact it's an Approach Radar only unit, with pilot interpreted procedures only for use if there's radar failure.
NB I believe all NATS airports are 'radar only'
NB I believe all NATS airports are 'radar only'
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not absolutely certain about this but I believe there may be a technical reason behind it. I had a discussion on this very subject with the Head of TC Ops a couple of months ago and I am sure he gave a technical explanation but I cannot remember what it was!
Point 4
Point 4
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
Could be due to the fact it's an Approach Radar only unit, with pilot interpreted procedures only for use if there's radar failure.
NB I believe all NATS airports are 'radar only'
NB I believe all NATS airports are 'radar only'
Perhaps someone at Luton has the same idea!
As for the practicalities;
The SRA 26 has the same RVR and MDA as the NDB. The missed approach point is at 1nm for the SRA and at the threshold (based on timng from LUT) for the NDB.
Using the constant descent profile, we will be going round between 1 and 2 miles at the same height anyway on either procedure so it makes little difference in terms of getting in.
From an ease of operation, I think having radar give ideal altitudes every mile works better for me than having to work out a timing from LUT and "suck it and see"! One will also have the NDB as a crosscheck during the SRA.
So my question is....why the fuss?
Regards,
DFC
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have asked my question on the Luton forum, the reply came back that straight in (direct) NDB approaches were ended some time ago at Luton but that procedural NDB approach for a non radar environment still exists. Wonder why they were ended?