Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Cleared for the Localiser

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Cleared for the Localiser

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jan 2006, 17:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ukatco_535, it's not as simple as that. Let's say a 737 has just joined the localiser, the glideslope is often coming in rapidly, the PF will want to configure the aircraft with flaps and possibly gear too, otherwise an unstable approach might result. An example of the PNF's workload is just to make a flap selection, he first has to check they're below the placarded maximum speed for it, physically move the flap lever to the desired setting, check that the flap position indicator needle actually moves to the correct position, additionally, if the PF is flying manually, the PNF has to calculate in his head the correct bug speed for that setting (which is a function of our landing speed, at least with our SOPs), and then set it.

As well as this the PNF has to watch that the PF is flying the desired flightpath, at the desired speed, move various controls to their correct position for landing (arm the speedbrake, engine start switches to CONT etc), take the 'cabin secure' call from the cabin crew and read the landing checklist.

We are taught from our earliest flying lessons to AVIATE-NAVIGATE-COMMUNICATE, in that order, and having to call localiser established tends to push the latter into a more prominent position that it needs to be.

Anything to reduce the PNF's workload at this critical stage of flight can only be welcomed.

Last edited by notdavegorman; 26th Jan 2006 at 17:27.
notdavegorman is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2006, 21:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is the phrase

"When established on the localiser, descend on the ILS" - a conditional descent clearance published in the UK Mats part one - which could solve this problem
TATC is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 11:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,832
Received 99 Likes on 72 Posts
Like I said before, this subject will be discussed between SRG and ATS providers very soon.
chevvron is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 12:54
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LTCC
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alleviation of r/t congestion on final approach

From 1st of February there will be a six month trial of amended phraseology for use by the approach controllers for Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and Luton airports.

During periodsof high r/t loading, especially when controllers anticipate that pilots will intercept the ILS G/P before being able to report to ATC that they are established on the localiser the following phraseology may be used;

'callsign when established on the localiser, descend on the ILS'
Slaphead is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 01:17
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's good, however one of the points I was trying to make was that it's not necessarily RT congestion that's the problem.
notdavegorman is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 10:58
  #26 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slaphead - good news! Do you have any details of the 'trial' - in particular how are airlines being notified and what (if any) will be the feedback process?
BOAC is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 12:43
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The phrase " when established on the localiser, descend on the ILS" has been in the UK MATS part 1 for a while, and has been in use on Heathrow Approach for a few years already
TATC is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 16:23
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 20D DTY
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TATC
The phrase " when established on the localiser, descend on the ILS" has been in the UK MATS part 1 for a while, and has been in use on Heathrow Approach for a few years already
And at other ATC Units too - the problem seems to be that it's such a mouthful, compared to 'Cleared ILS' as used in Europe, which is probably why it's not used more often.
Regular Cappuccino is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.