Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Reading "Approved" back

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Reading "Approved" back

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jan 2006, 16:34
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Reading "Approved" back

I think you're missing the point, TATC, that a clearance differs from permission or approval in that it is a contract between ATC and the aircraft. The ATC side of the bargain is that the relevant airspace is or will be clear, either of all traffic or of IFR traffic depending on the circumstances. The etymology of the word clearance as an everyday synonym for permission dates from the 1940s and ATC usage.

In the case of VFR in class D, the permission to enter a CTR is not logically a clearance as there is no promise of separation. That permission should be required to enter a class D CTR to create a known traffic environnment is not in dispute, nor, given the choice of UK law to require a clearance, that the RT phraseology should be "clearance".
bookworm is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2006, 19:59
  #22 (permalink)  
JEP
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Reading "Approved" back

So aften another hour of looking through ICAO-docs I find in DOC 4444 (PANS-ATM) chapter 12.3.2.1: Area control services - issuance of clearance:

Phraseologies:
a) (name of unit) CLEARS (aircraft call sign);
b) (aircraft call sign) CLEARED TO;
c) RECLEARED (amended clearance details) [REST OF
CLEARANCE UNCHANGED];
d) RECLEARED (amended route portion) TO (significant point of
original route) [REST OF CLEARANCE UNCHANGED];
e) ENTER CONTROLLED AIRSPACE (or CONTROL ZONE)
[VIA (significant point or route)] AT (level) [AT (time)];
f) LEAVE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE (or CONTROL ZONE)
[VIA (significant point or route)] AT (level) (or CLIMBING,
or DESCENDING);


so the phrase "CLEARED TO ENTER CONTROL ZONE" or "CLEARED TO LEAVE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE" (example in CAP 413) is not in accordance with DOC4444.
JEP is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2006, 22:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Reading "Approved" back

Originally Posted by JEP
so the phrase "CLEARED TO ENTER CONTROL ZONE" or "CLEARED TO LEAVE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE" (example in CAP 413) is not in accordance with DOC4444.
You're misinterpreting the structure of the table, JEP. Why would an ATC unit want to use the transmission "(name of unit) CLEARS (aircraft call sign)" in isolation? It would be meaningless. The phrases are to be concatenated, so (b) + (e) and (b) + (f) form exactly the phrases you quote.
bookworm is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2006, 10:39
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Northern Skies
Age: 43
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Reading "Approved" back

Originally Posted by bookworm
You're misinterpreting the structure of the table, JEP. Why would an ATC unit want to use the transmission "(name of unit) CLEARS (aircraft call sign)" in isolation? It would be meaningless. The phrases are to be concatenated, so (b) + (e) and (b) + (f) form exactly the phrases you quote.
It's used by AFIS-units in our country. "XYZ control clears ABC123..."
jangler909 is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2006, 19:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oxford
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Reading "Approved" back

Yes, but (a) still needs something else to be meaningful. Agree (a) is used in the UK e.g. a departure clearance at Oxford might begin 'Brize Radar clears G-ABCD standard BOTLI departure...'

Tim
tmmorris is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.