Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

False Tcas/acas Alerts

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

False Tcas/acas Alerts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2005, 23:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: wherever I lay my headset
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
False Tcas/acas Alerts

Early one morning recently, a twin turbo prop was established on final approach at a UK regional airport. At 7.5nms finals and about to descend on the GS, the pilot broke off the approach saying he had received a TCAS RA.

Although the aircraft was in unregulated airspace, all possible indications are that there were no other aircraft in the vacinity, probably nothing within 20-30nms... there was no other visible SSR, and no primary radar returns showing on two independant systems.

Although this incident is still under investigation, can anyone shed any light on spurious TCAS/ACAS indications, generally? Is this a known phenomena, does it happen often... what might be the cause?
Pierre Argh is offline  
Old 29th May 2005, 11:21
  #2 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Dallas Bump? - or reply received from aircraft on the ground? But both require other a/c. Have had it several times in the past in Upper Airspace with no other traffic around.
Lon More is offline  
Old 29th May 2005, 11:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
I am aware of recent problems with TCAS in mil aircraft giving spurious RAs. I think a 'wiring/installation problem' was causing the TCAS to give an RA against itself! Yes, I know that sounds ridiculous but that was the reason given.

Would any RAF engineering folk at the secret base in Oxfordshire like to expand/confirm/deny that?
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 29th May 2005, 11:51
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a number of occasions at West Drayton I observed the ATC SMF system giving "red" alerts on a single aeroplane. Somehow the system had decided the thing was in conflict with itself! I have also experienced similar situation to that reported by Pierre.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 30th May 2005, 01:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

We've also seen aircraft from time to time who have alerted on themselves. I've seen no explanation for why this would happen though.

regards

Scott
Scott Voigt is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 13:14
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: wherever I lay my headset
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Guys... since posting I found the following in an article on TCAS, and problems with the system in its "early stages", on the Aeronautics Learning Laboratory for Science, Technology & Research (Allstar) website

"...These were particularly disturbing because many alerts occurred when aircraft were on final approach, one of the busiest and most critical phases of flight. Version 6.00 was the original software for TCAS II. When using this software, some very interesting problems occurred. False conflict alerts were being triggered by transponders on ships and bridges. Additionally, parallel final approach courses less than 5000 feet apart were causing false alerts. It has even been reported that a pilot’s own aircraft can cause a false alarm. In this situation the pilot found himself trying to outmanoeuvere himself..."

Whether the aircraft in question was fitted with outdated equipment, or the bugs still persist I don't know?
Pierre Argh is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 15:45
  #7 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In this situation the pilot found himself trying to outmanoeuvere himself
- ahh! - but did he get away?
BOAC is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2005, 07:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pierre,

We used to get quite a few spurious TA/RAs with TCAS version 6. Since all companies here in Oz now have version 7, the problem seems to have been fixed.
DirtyPierre is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2005, 18:42
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: wherever I lay my headset
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The more I read the more it sounds like the version 6.00 software could be the problem... seeing as the subject aircraft in my incident is fairly low tech, and from a small airline operating just a handful of aircraft, it is probable they haven't forked out for the latest technology?

Are companies allowed to use different versions in the UK?
Pierre Argh is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2005, 00:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashville TN. USA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a Southwest airlines B737 that was climbing out of 60, that said he had a TCAS alert and asked if there was traffic off his right. The closest traffic off his right was up at FL350, and 7 miles off his left at 90.

TCAS still has problems, but it is better than it use to be.

Mike
NATCA BNA
NATCA BNA is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.