Military ATC on PPrune
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well there you have it.
I still think there is plenty of scope for a Mil ATC forum.
The general opinion is that Mil Conts should stay in with the Mil Aircrew. OK fine. As the ATC forum is mainly geared towards civvy controlling, how about we put this forum into one of the civvy airline pilots forums? Hmmm, somehow I don't think the civvies controllers would like that and maybe they can now see my point of view.
At the end of the day, I still believe we need a Mil forum to discuss things peculiar to the way we have to control. What we don't need is naff interjections from chimps who have never controlled in the mil environment and more importantly in the more interesting places we are operating at the moment.
Endex
I still think there is plenty of scope for a Mil ATC forum.
The general opinion is that Mil Conts should stay in with the Mil Aircrew. OK fine. As the ATC forum is mainly geared towards civvy controlling, how about we put this forum into one of the civvy airline pilots forums? Hmmm, somehow I don't think the civvies controllers would like that and maybe they can now see my point of view.
At the end of the day, I still believe we need a Mil forum to discuss things peculiar to the way we have to control. What we don't need is naff interjections from chimps who have never controlled in the mil environment and more importantly in the more interesting places we are operating at the moment.
Endex
Ohcirrej
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What we don't need is naff interjections from chimps who have never controlled in the mil environment
Tongue planted firmly in cheek
Personally, I don't think it's would be a good ida to split into seperate forums. As has been mentioned, we do have a lot to learn from each other.
Carbide puts it best:
Some of us civvies control quite a lot of mil traffic. Some of us are even interested in a military point of view. I'll continue to read any of the ATC threads be it in Civvy ATC, Mil ATC or Mil Aircrew. Can't we just keep ATC all together?
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The general opinion is that Mil Conts should stay in with the Mil Aircrew.
I read the consensus being that Mil and Civil ATC are adequately served by being in the same Forum (i.e. here) where both disciplines can interract.
Failing that, I am sure you can find a non simian Bulletin Board somewhere on the vast network called the Internet to cater for your needs
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I lay my head is home.
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Keep the forum joint
Have been keeping an eye on this thread for a while. Personally don't think that a Mil forum would benefit us in the Mil all that much really, some of us control more civvy aircraft than anything else and its always good to get as broad a section of opinion as possible. There is not that many of us Mil controllers anyway in reality – and soon to be less.
In any case we might all end up the same way someday:
Rumour or Fact?
Joint ATC recruitment for Mil / Civil
CATCS to relocate to Scampton - JATCC re-jigged => Civvy Controlling Qualification
Short Service Commissions only for Officers - end of service either PC or go civvy controller having already done some of the common training. Similar for SNCOs I guess.
Possibly due to need for common European Licensing.
Discuss
In any case we might all end up the same way someday:
Rumour or Fact?
Joint ATC recruitment for Mil / Civil
CATCS to relocate to Scampton - JATCC re-jigged => Civvy Controlling Qualification
Short Service Commissions only for Officers - end of service either PC or go civvy controller having already done some of the common training. Similar for SNCOs I guess.
Possibly due to need for common European Licensing.
Discuss
SIS EAST
I think that is wishful thinking on your part. Most of the comments that come from people like you are in the hope that it will come true and you will get an easy ride into civil ATC. If you are so keen on it...leave and go to Hurn!
I think that is wishful thinking on your part. Most of the comments that come from people like you are in the hope that it will come true and you will get an easy ride into civil ATC. If you are so keen on it...leave and go to Hurn!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I lay my head is home.
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Widger
Actually you could not be further from the truth, I am Mil through and through but I have the foresight and flexibility (plus a few rumours on the grapevine) to think outside of the box when it comes to issues concerning my professional sphere. In any case the said route is likely to be way into the future and of no affect to people like you or I anyway.
Quite frankly I get the impression that it is your inward thinking and argumentative responses that make the case for NOT having a Mil ATC forum quite apparent. There is not , and should not be an "us and them" divide as you seem to advocate.
To all other readers I hope that such responses do not tarnish all of us Mil ATCOs with the same brush!
SID (not SIS)
Actually you could not be further from the truth, I am Mil through and through but I have the foresight and flexibility (plus a few rumours on the grapevine) to think outside of the box when it comes to issues concerning my professional sphere. In any case the said route is likely to be way into the future and of no affect to people like you or I anyway.
Quite frankly I get the impression that it is your inward thinking and argumentative responses that make the case for NOT having a Mil ATC forum quite apparent. There is not , and should not be an "us and them" divide as you seem to advocate.
To all other readers I hope that such responses do not tarnish all of us Mil ATCOs with the same brush!
SID (not SIS)
SIL East,
If you are military through and through, why do you not spend your time, talking up your branch/service rather than doom-mongering and speculating. There is plenty of evidence that what you have stated will not happen.
I am very much "joined up" when it comes to military/civil co-operation but I agree with those that state there is no need for a Mil ATC forum. For one, most of the chat on the ATC forum is of a civil nature anyway.
If you are military through and through, why do you not spend your time, talking up your branch/service rather than doom-mongering and speculating. There is plenty of evidence that what you have stated will not happen.
I am very much "joined up" when it comes to military/civil co-operation but I agree with those that state there is no need for a Mil ATC forum. For one, most of the chat on the ATC forum is of a civil nature anyway.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Widger,
Actually you may be interested to know that a considerable amount of work has been completed towards accreditation of the CATCS syllabus. There are plans afoot to generate a new type of contract for youngsters coming into the branch - this is in line with the aim of ensuring everyone leaving the Service has a usable civilian qualification - it may happen sooner than you think.
Actually you may be interested to know that a considerable amount of work has been completed towards accreditation of the CATCS syllabus. There are plans afoot to generate a new type of contract for youngsters coming into the branch - this is in line with the aim of ensuring everyone leaving the Service has a usable civilian qualification - it may happen sooner than you think.
Airdrop,
Most of the accreditation that the military does is because of IIP. Most of the accreditation counts for very little in the Civil world unless you want to be an assistant or an ATC manager. If you want to work for a major employer like NATS, your CATCS time will count for nought.
The idea that you are all suddenly going to become civilian employees is farcical. Companies like NATS and SERCO can just about support the task they have at the moment.
You can't send civilian ATCOs to Basra, Baghdad or Bagram, most of them would not want to go to MPA, although they might like to go to Cyprus.
Your ATCOs have a wide portfolio of experience that is extremely valuable on deployed ops, just ask those that have served in some of the places mentioned above.
Once again I get the feeling that you also are one of those who would secretly like to "jump ship". Well regardless of an ATCOs CATCS experiences, moving to NATS will still cost you time and money.
Even NATS cannot afford to waste money on the likes of those that it is not going to get value out of. They are no longer employing many staff on permanent contracts. All it will take is another 9-11 and you could well be on the dole, knocking at the door of 3Gp asking for your job back.
If you are a military ATCO, then you should be advertising what you can do. You are a flexible beast, go anywhere, do anything, without the restrictions of a powerful union. You can be ORDERED to open up Director and also exceed the European Working Time directive in extremis. You should be pushing the boundaries of your branch to ensure that your expeditionary capability is enhanced, rather than sitting in your Vale of York/Lincolnshire/Welsh (delete as appropriate) Tower moaning about being on console for 61 and half minutes without a break.
You should be proud that when you deploy, your knowledge of airspace management is streets ahead of your American counterparts and you also have some awareness of what your WC brethren are about, because you have spent some time in 1ACC.
So stop speculating about turning civvy, in ain't gonna happen any time soon. Use your energy in spouting about how much better you and your colleagues are, than that Serco/NATS etc employee is, whose company is only concerned with making a profit for it's shareholders...at your expense.
Nuff said.
And no wise cracks about any Spillong mistakes either!
Most of the accreditation that the military does is because of IIP. Most of the accreditation counts for very little in the Civil world unless you want to be an assistant or an ATC manager. If you want to work for a major employer like NATS, your CATCS time will count for nought.
The idea that you are all suddenly going to become civilian employees is farcical. Companies like NATS and SERCO can just about support the task they have at the moment.
You can't send civilian ATCOs to Basra, Baghdad or Bagram, most of them would not want to go to MPA, although they might like to go to Cyprus.
Your ATCOs have a wide portfolio of experience that is extremely valuable on deployed ops, just ask those that have served in some of the places mentioned above.
Once again I get the feeling that you also are one of those who would secretly like to "jump ship". Well regardless of an ATCOs CATCS experiences, moving to NATS will still cost you time and money.
The CAA has today published its firm proposals for the regulatory price controls for Control Period 2. Chief executive, Paul Barron, this morning said: "We are disappointed at the stance the CAA has taken. In particular, we are concerned that the latest proposals require us to cut operating costs further in CP2, on top of the £106 million we already plan to take out of the business. With staff costs representing 70 per cent of our operating expenditure, the CAA's latest demands are going to be very tough to meet."
If you are a military ATCO, then you should be advertising what you can do. You are a flexible beast, go anywhere, do anything, without the restrictions of a powerful union. You can be ORDERED to open up Director and also exceed the European Working Time directive in extremis. You should be pushing the boundaries of your branch to ensure that your expeditionary capability is enhanced, rather than sitting in your Vale of York/Lincolnshire/Welsh (delete as appropriate) Tower moaning about being on console for 61 and half minutes without a break.
You should be proud that when you deploy, your knowledge of airspace management is streets ahead of your American counterparts and you also have some awareness of what your WC brethren are about, because you have spent some time in 1ACC.
So stop speculating about turning civvy, in ain't gonna happen any time soon. Use your energy in spouting about how much better you and your colleagues are, than that Serco/NATS etc employee is, whose company is only concerned with making a profit for it's shareholders...at your expense.
Nuff said.
And no wise cracks about any Spillong mistakes either!
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know, when I was a military ATC I too was mobile and all it really qualified me for was to prove that I could work in a really small space with old equipment in crappy conditions. The traffic was always less than what we handle on any moderate push today and normally with less hassle other than the amount of emergencies returning for sorties <G>...
regards
Scott
regards
Scott
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airdrop
What you say is very interesting.
Way, way back in about 1982 it was proposed (informally) to the then CNATS (AVM Ian Pedder) that the ATC syllabii at CATCS and CATC be aligned in the subjects of Nav. Met. and Air Law. The object being to provide all ATCOs with the foundation to Licences and do away with the special Article in the Air Navigation Order (as then was) that provided for the Certificate of Competance. Military and Civilian student controllers would then complete their own specialist syllabii prior to appropriate endorsements etc.
CNATS's view was that it was a non-starter - the reason given was that it would enable Mil ATCOs to move across to the Civilian area (having done the appropriate courses and/or exams) too readily and that the 'Unions would never wear it as it would interfere with career paths of existing ATCOs'. Have things changed at all?
BTW Let's keep the thread Joint - UK airspace is too cramped not to be aware of what is going on in the bigger picture.
What you say is very interesting.
Way, way back in about 1982 it was proposed (informally) to the then CNATS (AVM Ian Pedder) that the ATC syllabii at CATCS and CATC be aligned in the subjects of Nav. Met. and Air Law. The object being to provide all ATCOs with the foundation to Licences and do away with the special Article in the Air Navigation Order (as then was) that provided for the Certificate of Competance. Military and Civilian student controllers would then complete their own specialist syllabii prior to appropriate endorsements etc.
CNATS's view was that it was a non-starter - the reason given was that it would enable Mil ATCOs to move across to the Civilian area (having done the appropriate courses and/or exams) too readily and that the 'Unions would never wear it as it would interfere with career paths of existing ATCOs'. Have things changed at all?
BTW Let's keep the thread Joint - UK airspace is too cramped not to be aware of what is going on in the bigger picture.
niknak
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many moons ago, I did my aerodrome training at the origina Dundrige College in Devon, alongside a fast track course of some 10 ex - mil atcos, all of whom had been recruited by NATS to do aerodrome/approach procedural and approach radar in about 12 weeks.
As I recall, 9 out of the 10 passed with flying colours, and I have the utmost respect for those guys, had they failed, they would have been sacked by NATS and had nothing.
The difference between them and the vast majority of the current Mil ATCOs who desire to work in the civilian world, is that they had the balls to leave the "comfort zone", and risk everything.
If you're prepared to do that, good for you, you'll have the respect and support of nearly everyone in the Civillian world, if not, by all means pursue your military career, but don't blather on about what might have been until you have the courage to venture into the real world.
As I recall, 9 out of the 10 passed with flying colours, and I have the utmost respect for those guys, had they failed, they would have been sacked by NATS and had nothing.
The difference between them and the vast majority of the current Mil ATCOs who desire to work in the civilian world, is that they had the balls to leave the "comfort zone", and risk everything.
If you're prepared to do that, good for you, you'll have the respect and support of nearly everyone in the Civillian world, if not, by all means pursue your military career, but don't blather on about what might have been until you have the courage to venture into the real world.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was under the impression that anyone could sit the ATC exams, whether or not they had completed an ATC course - a risky/expensive thing to do but still permissable. There would be no need to leave the 'comfort zone' to obtain the appropriate Licences; this path has been trodden by several to my certain knowledge. Mind you getting the appropriate Endorsements is a different matter!
I understand that Permanent Commissions are rarely awarded in the current unstable climate in MoD recruitment so the option of leaving the 'comfort zone' is no longer a matter of choice.
BTW I agree with your comments, niknak, re. the guys that went the Dundridge route.
I understand that Permanent Commissions are rarely awarded in the current unstable climate in MoD recruitment so the option of leaving the 'comfort zone' is no longer a matter of choice.
BTW I agree with your comments, niknak, re. the guys that went the Dundridge route.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South West Wales
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many moons ago, I took the ATC exams privately while waiting to go on a NATS course - the short one, 4 months I think. Passed all but one exam before going on the course and passed the last one half way through the NATS course. Got me yellow peril and waved it at the instructor when asked questions Mind you I had to retake all the exams again at the end of the course:yuk. I then claimed three ATC licences, my original, a UK non state one and a UK state one. 
As far as mil controllers are concerned - worked closely with them over many years at LATCC, good bunch in the MAS.
Must try to push correct button before posting.
Mind you I had to retake all the exams again at the end of the course:yuk. I then claimed three ATC licences, my original, a UK non state one and a UK state one. As far as mil controllers are concerned - worked closely with them over many years at LATCC, good bunch in the MAS.
Must try to push correct button before posting.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Widger,
I'm not talking about IIP, I'm talking about professional recognition, and by the way, having done some of the interesting and exciting overseas work you mention we mil are so good at, if the last job on earth was civvy ATCO I'd rather stick rusty nails in my eyes. You're totally wrong about me wishing to jump ship (at least to civvy aviation)! My point is that I know that work is on-going to reallign the military terms of employment to enable mil ATCOs to leave after a defined contract period with a usable licence. This will not happen in my time, but look ahead a few years and wait and see.
EXATCO,
As I say, 85% of our trg is already aligned, work is progressing slowly to achieving full recognition. The concept is that the mil controller will have to fulfill their contract in order to leave with the qualification - thus avoiding the train and drain syndrome previously feared.
I'm not talking about IIP, I'm talking about professional recognition, and by the way, having done some of the interesting and exciting overseas work you mention we mil are so good at, if the last job on earth was civvy ATCO I'd rather stick rusty nails in my eyes. You're totally wrong about me wishing to jump ship (at least to civvy aviation)! My point is that I know that work is on-going to reallign the military terms of employment to enable mil ATCOs to leave after a defined contract period with a usable licence. This will not happen in my time, but look ahead a few years and wait and see.
EXATCO,
As I say, 85% of our trg is already aligned, work is progressing slowly to achieving full recognition. The concept is that the mil controller will have to fulfill their contract in order to leave with the qualification - thus avoiding the train and drain syndrome previously feared.
