Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

recording devices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Nov 2004, 11:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MRats
Age: 54
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
recording devices

Quote: "........that air traffic control units be equipped with devices that record background communications and noise at ATC work stations......."

This is a recommendation. Any comments would be appreciated
Voel is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2004, 14:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 43° 40' 47" , -80° 25' 28"
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it from a report on Occupational Health and Safety??
Llamapoo is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2004, 16:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds Ueberlingen related ..... ?

RT
Roger That is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2004, 17:28
  #4 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was mooted at Maastricht many years ago. It was seen as an invasion of privacy then; probably still on management agenda, but I understand they have enough other problems at the moment
Lon More is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2004, 22:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: On a Ship Near You
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Oz we are protected from these 'background' recordings in the same way that applies to pilot cockpit recordings.

It's not done here yet; but if it is done the legislation that protects pilots from punitive or discipline as a result of what gets recorded applies. That is anyone who uses it is breaking the law, I know that doesn't mean people who get access don't have long memories...

But I'm not sure that only operationally specific information would end up in a published transcript; as is supposed to happen with black box recordings.
SM4 Pirate is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2004, 05:49
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MRats
Age: 54
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It comes out the recommendation of the Ueberlingen accident report
Voel is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2004, 09:25
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: EGTT/FAB/LGW/BOH/FAB/LGW
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know of one NATS unit that used to have a recorded 'live' microphone in the tower at all times, made for some interesting listening after incident that made the papers!!

p.s. It was removed soon after it became known to the staff that it was there.
SilentHandover is online now  
Old 20th Nov 2004, 09:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SH...

Surely no-one would be that unprofessional.....would they..?

As an aside..... don't forget that when you press most direct lines the recording starts even though the other end have not answered.... and most mics can pick up neighbouring conversations!!! Comments such as "answer the f***ing phone" make interesting transcripts!
AlanM is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2004, 21:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were going to trial open mike recording at TC a couple of years ago but I think the union got it thrown out. Would have made great blackmail material though.....................
Vlad the Impaler is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2004, 21:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California USA
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not coming out as an advocate of general recording, but I have to say that there have been times over the last 25 years when I've thought it would be a good idea. Coordination is not always done over a recorded line, and when within earshot, controllers sometimes (often? always?) approve things "in person" which obviously SHOULD be done over a recorded line (am I dancing around the edge of this deftly enough?). So, for instance, I point out a guy to the controller next to me (by literally pointing at the target on his display and talking to him without benefit of electronics) and he approves it. When it goes to hell, the other controller denies ever having approved the point-out. This is but one example. I think it's safe to say that we ALL know that lots of stuff gets done without leaving a trail. Trying to reconstruct what actually happened in any given situation can only benefit from a better trail.

Now, before you kick me in the head over this, know that I'm equally sensitive about recording everything all the time. I'm just expressing what I believe is a reasonable argument from the "pro" side. How to balance these needs is the question.
av8boy is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2004, 05:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moscow
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moscow ATCC has been 'monitored' and recorded for many years. 24h- video cameras are being installed at some centres.
cancel_mayday is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2004, 17:02
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: wherever I lay my hat...
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Systems like these have been in use in at least one Middle Eastern unit for some time and are particularly useful in incident investigations.

They do require a great deal of responsible management in their use, but from my experience they have more often baled out an ATCO as described by AV8 than any other outcome.

I have to confess to once repeating something on the recordings outside a professional forum..... however it was a particularly good joke involving a petshop, a bunny rabbit and a python!!
Father Jack is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2004, 17:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Stinkin' Harbor
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the centre in Hong Kong, where the union doesn't have the power or the will to pull the skin off a rice pudding, all the mikes are live all the time.
Conversation between controllers is carried out in furtive whispers with ones hand over the mike.
More than one (expat) controller has faced "rubber hosing" as a result of a careless comment (about management) made during a quiet period without the appropriate safeguards.
Lap? Kok? - Chek! is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.