Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

RVSM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Aug 2001, 22:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: england
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post RVSM

Hi tech question:

There is disagreement on the requirements of rate of descent and rate of climb in RVSM airspace.

There are two interpretations of the rule and I would be grateful if someone could give the correct answer.

1. Any climb or descent within RVSM airspace , from climbing into or descending out of , or changing level should be limited to 1000 fpm

2. climbing into or out of RVSM airspace is free rate of climb / descent but changing level within RVSM is limited to 1000 fpm.

I have read our company paperwork and the Racal extracts and it seems you could argue that both are correct..


Help please

freddyfokker is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2001, 12:43
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: england
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Someone must know, any North sea sector ATC'rs out there?
freddyfokker is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2001, 14:09
  #3 (permalink)  

Mostly Harmless
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oz (cold & wet bit)
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

As you can see I am not from those parts.... I have read a bit about you procedures though, (we are introducing RVSM here shortly).

As I understand it there is no rule, it is just a technique for you aeroplane people to absorb. If you do the last 1000' of your level change at 1000 fpm or less you will not set off a vertical domino effect of TCAS RA in your crowded skies.

We have to really try to get a TCAS to beep here, so have not even suggested the technique.

Apparantly won't even be neccessary with later versions of TCAS more friendly to RVSM.
karrank is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2001, 14:59
  #4 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Why not check out the official documentation, available online ??

UK AIC 80/00 (Yellow 24)

It's in Paragraph 3.2

When approaching the first cleared level and/or when changing flight level in RVSM airspace, aim to keep the vertical speed within 500 to 1000 fpm, do not exceed 1500fpm and ensure that the aeroplane neither undershoots nor overshoots the cleared flight level by more than 150 feet, manually overriding if necessary.
10W is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2001, 21:55
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: england
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

10w

Thank you for your reply,

The real area of concern is regarding descents, climbing into RVSM airspace, we are unlikely to exceed the ROC of 1000 fpm , and when changing level a small adjustment is all that is required.

If I am flying in RVSM airspace say FL 340 and cleared to descend say to FL90 what rate of descent can I use and what would you expect.

The aircraft FMS obviously knows nothing about RVSM and will plan a descent based on the best profile, often around 2-3000 fpm.

If we need to descend at 1000 fpm we will have to ignore the FMS and descend earlier, also our flightplans will need ammending for the slight increase in fuel burn.

At the moment it seems we are all using FMS procedures and existing descent profiles is this correct?
freddyfokker is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2001, 01:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sunny Scotland
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

freddy

I'm not sure about other people, but your rate of descent would not be restricted by us, but if you were descending towards traffic 1000ft below your cleared level, then approaching at higher rates may cause TCAS problems. (and I stand ready to be corrected on that coz i'm not a pilot).
Other than that I can think of no reason to restrict your rate of descent
hope that helps
ayrprox is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2001, 01:02
  #7 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

freddyfocker

Well my interpretation would be as follows:

Cleared to climb into RVSM airspace, e.g FL90 to FL320. Any rate of climb you wish till approaching FL320, then not exceeding 1500fpm.

Cleared to climb from one RVSM level to another, e.g. FL320 to FL360. Rate of climb not to exceed 1500fpm.

Cleared to descend into RVSM airspace, e.g FL430 to FL320. Any rate of descent you wish till approaching FL320, then not exceeding 1500fpm.

Cleared to descend from one RVSM level to another, e.g. FL360 to FL320. Rate of descent not to exceed 1500fpm.

Cleared to descend out of RVSM airspace, e.g FL320 to FL90. Any rate of descent you wish.


That's what I would expect pilots to comply with. Hope this helps.
10W is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2001, 01:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: solent-on-sea
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Just as an aside, why do pilots keep telling me they're non RVSM compliant when they've only filed FL180?
Or is RVSM airspace too heavy with all the extra traffic and is now sinking?
Not Long Now is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.