Height Issue
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nottingham
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheers everyone, a name plate hay, I might need that after a night out to remember who I am!!!!!!!!!
Seriously, cheers all, and if you want to forward it on it would be greatly recieved!
Cheers.
Ben
Seriously, cheers all, and if you want to forward it on it would be greatly recieved!
Cheers.
Ben
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just found out the height requirements from the NATS application form on the internet:
Are you between 151.4 cm (59.6 in) and 186.9 cm (73.6 in)? in height
Are you between 151.4 cm (59.6 in) and 186.9 cm (73.6 in)? in height
Last edited by pumuckl; 1st Jul 2005 at 14:22.
Mostly Harmless
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oz (cold & wet bit)
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...186.9 cm...
It is the stupidest form of discrimination I've ever heard of, does your union have a position on this farcical ruling?
I understand an existing tall NATS controller is taking NATS to court for damages caused to him/her by the ergonomics of the furniture over the years.
One way to stop this happening again is to impose a height limit I suppose.
Meanwhile, the vast majority of tall folks work on as normal ..... always one bad apple to spoil it for the rest I guess
One way to stop this happening again is to impose a height limit I suppose.
Meanwhile, the vast majority of tall folks work on as normal ..... always one bad apple to spoil it for the rest I guess
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...29/ntall29.xml
A 6ft 10in graduate was refused a job as an air traffic controller because he was considered too tall to sit at his desk, an employment tribunal heard yesterday.
Ben Sargeaunt-Thomson, 23, had been accepted for the post but at his medical the doctor's height chart stopped short of the top of his head and he was failed on health and safety grounds.
Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson suggested ways in which his "work station" could be adapted, but when the National Air Traffic Services (Nats) control centre at Swanwick, Hants, insisted on withdrawing its offer he took it to an employment tribunal.
The Nottingham Trent physics graduate, who has size 14 feet and a 38 in leg, alleges indirect sexual discrimination, arguing that only a man could reach 6ft 10ins.
The tribunal, in Southampton, heard that Nats decided he would be unable to sit comfortably and that this posed a "danger". There was no practical solution and the job he had been offered in 2003 while still at university was no longer open to him.
Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson, who is still growing, told the tribunal: "I have wanted to be an air traffic controller since I was 13 or 14. It was my dream job.
"During the assessments it became apparent my legs were too long to fit under the control centre's work stations. I tried to position the chair differently but there was not enough legroom for me to sit comfortably."
He said that anyone taller than 6ft 2in would struggle to use the work stations. "Bearing in mind that men are generally taller than women, this is indirectly discriminating against men."
Andrew Hutchinson, the head of recruitment at Nats, said Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson would have had difficulty using the equipment. But the decision to withdraw the offer was taken reluctantly, "particularly as Ben was incredibly keen".
Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson, from Northampton, has since been offered an air traffic control trainee job in Luxembourg at a centre with adjustable desks.
Nats is making work stations adaptable for taller people and hopes to have the changes in place by 2012.
Judgment was reserved.
A 6ft 10in graduate was refused a job as an air traffic controller because he was considered too tall to sit at his desk, an employment tribunal heard yesterday.
Ben Sargeaunt-Thomson, 23, had been accepted for the post but at his medical the doctor's height chart stopped short of the top of his head and he was failed on health and safety grounds.
Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson suggested ways in which his "work station" could be adapted, but when the National Air Traffic Services (Nats) control centre at Swanwick, Hants, insisted on withdrawing its offer he took it to an employment tribunal.
The Nottingham Trent physics graduate, who has size 14 feet and a 38 in leg, alleges indirect sexual discrimination, arguing that only a man could reach 6ft 10ins.
The tribunal, in Southampton, heard that Nats decided he would be unable to sit comfortably and that this posed a "danger". There was no practical solution and the job he had been offered in 2003 while still at university was no longer open to him.
Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson, who is still growing, told the tribunal: "I have wanted to be an air traffic controller since I was 13 or 14. It was my dream job.
"During the assessments it became apparent my legs were too long to fit under the control centre's work stations. I tried to position the chair differently but there was not enough legroom for me to sit comfortably."
He said that anyone taller than 6ft 2in would struggle to use the work stations. "Bearing in mind that men are generally taller than women, this is indirectly discriminating against men."
Andrew Hutchinson, the head of recruitment at Nats, said Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson would have had difficulty using the equipment. But the decision to withdraw the offer was taken reluctantly, "particularly as Ben was incredibly keen".
Mr Sargeaunt-Thomson, from Northampton, has since been offered an air traffic control trainee job in Luxembourg at a centre with adjustable desks.
Nats is making work stations adaptable for taller people and hopes to have the changes in place by 2012.
Judgment was reserved.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: around about
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ben's a bit busy at the mo jetting about posing for photos etc.. He's says thanks for all the support and he'll make a post on Monday when he gets back to Luxembourg. Go get them mate
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course its NATS fault. They presumably knew about his height when he came for interview/assessments. To let him pass all of that and then turn him down on medical grounds is quite criminal in my opinion. Hopefully NATS will get exactly what they deserve.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perplexed? You obviousely don't undertstand internet users. We love to have a bit of a rant. In any event this is about the plucky little (little?) man winning against the odds. It is the English way. Alf Tupper against the toffs.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ISZ - not the end of the world, but you can see it from here.
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could have been worse, they could have kept quiet until the last summative at the college, then chopped him...
I'm erm, taller than the 'maximum' height as mentioned before. Should I jump before I'm pushed?
I'm erm, taller than the 'maximum' height as mentioned before. Should I jump before I'm pushed?