EASA survey

[Armchairflyer]

Might not amount to much after all, but at least an opportunity to express one's concerns wrt Kafkaesque regulations. And I was actually astonished (almost positively surprised) to see that there is apparently a certain awareness of the contrast between purely prescriptive, compliance-based vs. risk-based and goal-oriented safety regulations (lower part of the survey). Maybe enough voices in favour of the second approach can indeed point them in a better direction than the actual "box-ticking bureaucracy" red tape.

Consultations - Transport (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/consultations/2014-aviation-safety_en.htm)

[Sir George Cayley]

Bump up ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Might fill in an hour on a very wet Sunday afternoon.

FL

[Gertrude the Wombat]

I've filled it in but I doubt I've added anything they didn't already know.

[flybymike]

Bit of a chore but I've done it.

[Andy H]

I have filled it in as well - but it does seem (to me at least) that EASA are setting their own agenda and looking for (some) answers they want to see
A

[Maoraigh1]

I filled it in on 21 June. Is there another thread with this link? If not, I wonder where I got the link from. (I opted for getting a copy of my response back - the questions seemed familiar, and I checked and found it.)

[flybymike]

I have filled it in as well - but it does seem (to me at least) that EASA are setting their own agenda and looking for (some) answers they want to see
A

I agree. The questions are somewhat carefully phrased and biased, although to be fair there are plenty of opportunities given for free speech.
Whether such free speech can be statistically recorded and properly reflected (like tick box questions can) is another matter.