PDA

View Full Version : Channel/frequency


Winston
20th Sep 2005, 17:44
What is the present JAR/European rules about phraseology (spellcheck) about saying the word channel or frequency before a channel (or frequency) on RT. Exzmple contact london CHANNEL 135 decimal 350 or contact brest FREQUENCY 118 decimal 95

BEXIL160
20th Sep 2005, 18:13
Currently:

Frequencies: 25khz spaced, such as 118.1, 124.75 etc etc

Channels 8.33khz spacings e.g. 132.205, 132.510, 118.885

So "contact London on frequency135.05" (wun tree fife day- see -mall zero fife)

and "contact Brest on channel118.885" (wun wun ait day- see -mal ait ait fife)

However, oh dear... it's all about to change see:http://www.eurocontrol.int/vhf833/public/standard_page/Phraseology.html

Lots of good stuff on that site

Rgds BEX

Chilli Monster
20th Sep 2005, 18:17
My understanding is that "Frequency" doesn't need to be said but "Channel" does.

So:

Any 25KHz spaced frequency e.g 127.975 would be "127 decimal 97"

Any 8.33 KHz spaced frequency e.g. 127.980 would be spoken as "Channel 127 decimal 980".

BEXIL160
20th Sep 2005, 18:37
Chilli is quite right, you don't need to say "frequency" at the moment (some people do, but there's no need), but you do need to say Channel.

rgds BEX

Right Way Up
20th Sep 2005, 19:23
Nice to see that sense prevails with the withdrawal of the term "channel". Maybe soon they will look at providing a more user friendly demarcation of frequencies.

Winston
21st Sep 2005, 07:27
Fantastic! That answers my question perfectly, Thank-you very much.
Whilst I've got you, in the UK (or europe in fact) should I say the word "degrees" after a heading eg "radar heading 320" or "radar heading 320 DEGREES"

incubus
21st Sep 2005, 08:06
Doesn't that argument normally end up saying that you should say "degrees" but you should not say "radar"? ;)

spekesoftly
21st Sep 2005, 08:59
CAP 493 (The UK Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1) states that the word 'degrees' should be appended to heading figures where the heading ends in zero, or in cases where confusion or ambiguity may result.

So, "Heading 320 degrees" is correct for an ATC instruction, but I'm not aware of any specific requirement that mandates the word 'degrees' in the read-back, but I guess the same principle applies.

Spuds McKenzie
21st Sep 2005, 09:21
"Heading 320 degrees" is UK stuff.
Anywhere else in Europe (to my knowledge) it's "Heading 320".

Widger
21st Sep 2005, 11:51
I understand in France that if it is 8.33 you must say "La Manche"!

Flobadob
21st Sep 2005, 19:10
"Heading 320 degrees" is UK stuff.

Not by UK Mil controllers it's not.

We don't have time to fanny around with flowery phraseology!

Standby......................incoming! :ooh:

Spuds McKenzie
21st Sep 2005, 20:16
We don't have time to fanny around with flowery phraseology!
Fair enough, same here. :ok: