Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Channel/frequency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Sep 2005, 17:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Channel/frequency

What is the present JAR/European rules about phraseology (spellcheck) about saying the word channel or frequency before a channel (or frequency) on RT. Exzmple contact london CHANNEL 135 decimal 350 or contact brest FREQUENCY 118 decimal 95
Winston is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2005, 18:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: I sell sea shells by the sea shore
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Currently:

Frequencies: 25khz spaced, such as 118.1, 124.75 etc etc

Channels 8.33khz spacings e.g. 132.205, 132.510, 118.885

So "contact London on frequency135.05" (wun tree fife day- see -mall zero fife)

and "contact Brest on channel118.885" (wun wun ait day- see -mal ait ait fife)

However, oh dear... it's all about to change see:http://www.eurocontrol.int/vhf833/pu...raseology.html

Lots of good stuff on that site

Rgds BEX
BEXIL160 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2005, 18:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My understanding is that "Frequency" doesn't need to be said but "Channel" does.

So:

Any 25KHz spaced frequency e.g 127.975 would be "127 decimal 97"

Any 8.33 KHz spaced frequency e.g. 127.980 would be spoken as "Channel 127 decimal 980".
Chilli Monster is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2005, 18:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: I sell sea shells by the sea shore
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chilli is quite right, you don't need to say "frequency" at the moment (some people do, but there's no need), but you do need to say Channel.

rgds BEX
BEXIL160 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2005, 19:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: home
Posts: 1,569
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
Nice to see that sense prevails with the withdrawal of the term "channel". Maybe soon they will look at providing a more user friendly demarcation of frequencies.
Right Way Up is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2005, 07:27
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fantastic! That answers my question perfectly, Thank-you very much.
Whilst I've got you, in the UK (or europe in fact) should I say the word "degrees" after a heading eg "radar heading 320" or "radar heading 320 DEGREES"
Winston is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2005, 08:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't that argument normally end up saying that you should say "degrees" but you should not say "radar"?
incubus is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2005, 08:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,916
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
CAP 493 (The UK Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1) states that the word 'degrees' should be appended to heading figures where the heading ends in zero, or in cases where confusion or ambiguity may result.

So, "Heading 320 degrees" is correct for an ATC instruction, but I'm not aware of any specific requirement that mandates the word 'degrees' in the read-back, but I guess the same principle applies.
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2005, 09:21
  #9 (permalink)  

The Original Party Animal
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Around the corner
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Heading 320 degrees" is UK stuff.
Anywhere else in Europe (to my knowledge) it's "Heading 320".
Spuds McKenzie is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2005, 11:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MARS
Posts: 1,102
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
I understand in France that if it is 8.33 you must say "La Manche"!
Widger is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2005, 19:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Heading 320 degrees" is UK stuff.
Not by UK Mil controllers it's not.

We don't have time to fanny around with flowery phraseology!

Standby......................incoming!
Flobadob is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2005, 20:16
  #12 (permalink)  

The Original Party Animal
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Around the corner
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We don't have time to fanny around with flowery phraseology!
Fair enough, same here.
Spuds McKenzie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.