Airline Employment

[Tosh McCaber]

What’s your opinion on the seniority system within the airlines? In just about any other industry, a job will be advertised according to a person’s skills. People are thereafter let go, or kept with the firm, according to their value to the firm.

In the airline industry, it’s usually a case of last person in becomes junior to those with more service with the airline, no matter what the discrepancy may be in their individual skills. Is this system fair?

[christian_MD80]

Yes

[Hold at Saffa]

NO!. .It's union entrenched garbage that ensures snouts that would be unemployable elsewhere remain burried in their respective troughs.

I hold the view that its high time seniority was abolished completely from the airline industry. Whats wrong with using performance as the prerequisite for advancement?

[ 25 January 2002: Message edited by: Hold at Saffa ]</p>

[hvassk]

How would propose to measure performance of airline pilot? The majority of pilots do their job and keep their noses clean. Most have never spoken to the Chief Pilot and are just "another number." Seniority is the only way to justify layoffs. What's next, would you base compensation on performance also?

[Hold at Saffa]

The same way every other business on earth does it, by using things that are objectively measureable. Safety, economy, punctuality, appearance, bearing, demeanour, affability toward fellow employees, the list is long and dull, but equitable.. . [quote]What's next, would you base compensation on performance also? <hr></blockquote>. .Yes, I would!

[ 25 January 2002: Message edited by: Hold at Saffa ]</p>

[maxalt]

[quote]appearance, bearing, demeanour<hr></blockquote>

Appearance...a nice white boy with clean shoes.

Bearing......Knows how to bend over, and does so without needing to be asked.

Demeanour....Suitably grovelling to me and the rest of management.

Yawwnnn...we've had this out already and it was binned as unworkable.

Next please.