Log in

View Full Version : Charlie charlie?


Gin Slinger
18th Aug 2004, 21:53
I know what it means, but where does the expression come from? Certainly not from my copy of CAP413.

1261
18th Aug 2004, 22:17
Under ITU rules (which apply in a general way to all forms of radio communication) the code letter "C" (charlie) means "yes/affirmative/the siginificance of the previous group should be ready in the positive".

Although it doesn't figure in UK legislation, the term "charlie charlie" is widely used internationally in the same way as the UK term "affirm".

See also the separate discussion of the use of "securite", another ITU expression used widely internationally but not really seen in the UK aeronautical world.

niknak
18th Aug 2004, 22:58
It's a slap dash R/T expression used by slap dash pilots (and occassionally atcos) who can't be arsed to use proper R/T procedures.

Use it on my frequency and I'll send the boys round.....:E

Golf Charlie Charlie
19th Aug 2004, 01:41
Quite right too, I say, G-CC.

Avman
19th Aug 2004, 09:34
What a petty and pompous attitude niknak. Personally I find it perfectly clear and unambigious. Oh sorry, if it's not British it can't be any good!:p

Van Der Hum
19th Aug 2004, 10:56
It's a slap dash R/T expression used by slap dash pilots (and occassionally atcos) who can't be arsed to use proper R/T procedures.

But not as slapdash as saying "fox" because they can't be arsed to manage the extra syllable in "foxtrot"!!

Human Factor
19th Aug 2004, 10:59
It's a slap dash R/T expression used by slap dash pilots (and occassionally atcos) who can't be arsed to use proper R/T procedures.

I guess you don't use HF then.... ;)

1261
19th Aug 2004, 13:36
He meant UK aeronautical VHF R/T; didn't you, niknak?!

Arkady
19th Aug 2004, 16:42
Charlie Charlie

C C

Si Si

Yes Yes

And just for niknak,

Affirm I say again Affirm

Radarero
19th Aug 2004, 18:17
I thought it came from the nautical alphabet, the flag for the letter C meaning "yes".
One should know what CC means, being a controller.
An Aeroflot pilot has been asked recently whether his destination was Uniform Uniform Echo Echo.
His answer was: Charlie Charlie

Then his flightplan was changed by the controller to UUCC.

He might still be wondering!

vintage ATCO
19th Aug 2004, 22:02
I thought it meant a pair of breasts . . . . or have I missed the point :confused:

cresslime
20th Aug 2004, 04:45
what about TX ended by "over" ? It's sounds too old fashioned to me. Only used by few atcos & crews.

TrafficTraffic
20th Aug 2004, 07:20
...Its interesting to see where the priorties lie in Uk ATC.
Niknak is worried about the slap-dash-whoops-hows-your-father use of Charlie Charlie but the minor issues of separation of traffic, and coordination, passing estimates etc... well we wont worry about those will we .....


TT :sad:

LostThePicture
20th Aug 2004, 08:56
.... a Maastricht controller trying to take the moral high ground on "the minor issues of separation of traffic".

:D :D :D :D :D :D

If I only had a pound (that fine British currency) for every time Maastricht gave me traffic that wasn't separated, I'd be able to comfortably retire from ATC on the ensuing windfall.

LTP

Arran's view
20th Aug 2004, 11:05
If I only had a pound (that fine British currency) for every time Maastricht gave me traffic that wasn't separated, I'd be able to comfortably retire from ATC on the ensuing windfall.


We could comfortably afford to double that stake LTP and be quite sure of being wealthy. They do exactly the same to us in that nasty wee corner of sector 10/11 where they chuck us the traffic in your airspace without co-ordinating with either you or us ... and we have the minor matter of not having half of the traffic identified because it is on a squawk which converts to something already in NAS. :ugh: :ugh:

PPRuNe Radar
20th Aug 2004, 11:12
And TrafficTraffic doesn't even drink beer ...... big girls blouse :):p ;)

TrafficTraffic
20th Aug 2004, 12:27
LMAO

lets see...

Kettle .... Black..... Calling .....Pot not in that order...

Or something to do with glass houses but cant remeber exactly what...



Arrans view - I agree with you 100% that is a nasty corner and handled poorly.

millerman
20th Aug 2004, 17:15
Is that traffic not seperated on your (new electronic) strips or on radar? (it sometimes helps to look at the radar)

APP Radar
22nd Aug 2004, 15:57
This thread started with the discussion about the meaning of "CC", if I recall ... why are we (?) discussing poor atc practices ?

I often get CC as an affirmative answer and sometimes only C and knowing what it means, accept it ...

But I do try not to use it.

Ausatco
24th Aug 2004, 10:56
In 34 years of Aussie ATC I cannot recall hearing CC for "yes", though I've never worked HF. Must be a European thing.

Here we are strict users of "Affirmative", the aviation abbreviation for "yes", itself abbreviated in AIP to "Affirm", and "Negative", the aviation abbreviation for "no". For some reason AIP has not reduced that to "neg":E

AA

AirNoServicesAustralia
24th Aug 2004, 15:11
Hey Ausatco, When I worked an extremely large non radar sector in Oz, a few years back, I heard a couple of the asian pilots use CC. Now over in the Middle East, I hear it alot. It isn't any quicker than "affirm", but it is clear what is intended by the response so I have no problem with it being used. Generally Australia is, from what I have seen in a very multicultural ATC Centre here, the most regimented and strict RT wise, and sticks to the book more than anyone else I have seen. Initially coming here the relaxed RT freaked me out, and I fought against it, but you hit your head against a brick wall long enough, you just give yourself a sore head. Once you get over that, the relaxed RT generally works just as well, and I think Oz could learn a bit from the rest of the world and take a chill pill.

I still remember the look I got when I "concurred" to a level change. The other controller was sure I was a horses hoof!!!

av8boy
24th Aug 2004, 16:09
Ah the slippery-slope...

So long as phraseology doesn’t degenerate to the point where approach clearances go something like,

“five from it, three thousand till it, cleared for it, call the tower at it….”

You know who you are, and you know damned well it's wrong.

:rolleyes:

Bol Zup
24th Aug 2004, 18:45
Who came up with affirm and negative anyway?
What's wrong with "Yes" and "No"?
Short, concise, easily distinguishable and the two most understood words in the world.

tmmorris
24th Aug 2004, 22:40
The police get along quite happily in the UK with 'Yes, yes' and 'No, no' to make themselves clearer.

Tim

divingduck
25th Aug 2004, 19:58
"Charlie Charlie" has been used since the dark ages...and it's like a cockroach, not even a nuclear winter will kill the expression.:}

But really, who cares?

Ausatco, I worked in Oz for over 15 years...used to hear it all the time.

The one that really annoys me is...."mumble mumble mumble...interogative?"

Cheers