BACX for sale.

[Rider of the Purple Sage]

So now we're being briefed that unless we can cut many millions off our operation, mainline BA will 'do a Deutsche BA' on us. This at a formal employee meeting the other night.

What next - please discuss.




:{

[cumulo-granite]

Yet again BA inflicts the kiss of death on what used to be several well run and profitable organisations.... The best of luck to all in BACX

:mad:

[GWYN]

What formal employee meeting?

[alterego]

Can you really be surprised?

Eddington has got rid of everything Ayling worked for. In the process he's ruined a good regional setup lost many BA staff jobs and lost market share.

He gave Go to Babs (who cashed in at Easy) just as it was turning a profit and now killed Brymon and Bral. Then given Eastern the Aircraft and routes that it wanted.

He's singularly responsible for destroying part of Britains heritage, in grounding Concorde. After all he is the boss and it is with him that the buck stops. Then he gives 2 frames to the yanks after what they did to stop the whole thing from being a success.

BACX was always going to be a dead duck from the day they wanted an all jet fleet. There are some routes that will not support jets but can make money with turboprops.

[Uncle Silas]

Hadn't heard anything about this one, what, where when, more details please !!:ugh:

Can't believe I'm hearing this, :mad: :mad: What in the name of God do BA define as Airline Management?????????:confused:

[stop, stop, stop]

Are you serious?

News like that isn't good for any of us.

Not a BACX employee, but a.n.other rival company. We all need rivals to keep the market afloat and the profession bouyant.

If true, best of luck to all in BACX!:ok:

[Unwell_Raptor]

If this is true (and I know nothing) it is typical of all big company management. If your predecessor diversified, cut back to the 'core business' and blame the year one losses on him. The inverse will also apply. If he decentralised, centralise, or vice versa. Blame as above.

It will take about four more years for your plan not to work. You will then collect your five million quid and leave, and your successor will start all over again.

A classic example was Ford, a fairly well run company, that bought Kwik-Fit for UKP1 billion and sold it a few years later for about UKP 300 million. They must have been wrong, either to have bought it in the first place or to have sold it. It's the kind of short term thinking than bugs business in the UK and America.

[In trim]

I used to work for one of the BA Franchise airlines.....in the good old days before BA started ruining all of them by a process of merger / amalgamation / integration / shafting. Glad I had the opportunity to get out when I did!

Best of luck to all in BACX. There is no way it can survive in its current form, saddled with the BA costs and inefficiencies, but here's hoping something positive will come of it.

This will all add to BA shinking back to a LHR-centric airline.

In trim.

[maninblack]

Then let us pray that the trolls in waterside get on with it swiftly so we can get back to earning a living. The entire UK industry cannot live on Daily Expres briefings.

[marlowe]

What staff meeting was this?? Even David Evans favourite base MAN are in the dark on this one!!!!!

[Cornflake]

I wasn't there personally, but heard from a colleague who was.
It was a meeting at SOU, chaired by TdlF, AM and SC.
Granted therefore this is secondhand, but seemingly AM admitted to a forthcoming 777 course, while TdlF confirmed he was unlikely to be with us much longer due his ambition to return to BA.

Reference to Deutsche BA was if proposed cuts in overheads were not achieved very soon. :yuk: :yuk: :yuk:

[judge11]

Well, there's one cost-cutting measure to start with!

[Dewdrop]

They may call it a sale, but I heard they were handing it over lock stock and barrel to Eastern, or whatever company they chose to create for the exercise.

[marlowe]

So if only we could get rid of Evans and the rest of his little gang we could save a bundle of cash in salary

[Quidnunc]

So, despite all this belly-aching no-one has any solid evidence that BA intends to sell BACX.
A threat to sell up if cost can't be bought down is the oldest one in the book. Can't believe you suckers have fallen for it.
If BA do want to sell BACX, they'll have to tell the stockmarket first. So unless you see this rumour in reputable print / media give it the credence you would a gypsy selling heather.

[faq]

Was AM the managment pilot who left an EMB145 engine running on stand in Germany on a layover and received a call from the handling agent at check in at the hotel to return and shut it down?

[alosaurus]

Well said Quid..That old favourite phrase of UK management again

"There are two motivators of men interest and fear"

Its always more difficult to get people interested.


FAQ - Regarding AM and the engines.....slight distortion there.

The engines didn't shutdown (thrust levers need to be all the way back on a 145 or the stop selector doesn't) ...but it was the baggage handlers positioning beneath the no. 1 engine who found it a bit noisier than normal.

[Xebec]

"So now we're being briefed that unless we can cut many millions off our operation, mainline BA will 'do a Deutsche BA' on us."

"Granted therefore this is secondhand, but seemingly AM admitted to a forthcoming 777 course, while TdlF confirmed he was unlikely to be with us much longer due his ambition to return to BA."

Huh! Obviously a thinly disguised ploy to raise morale..........

I've a hunch it might just work.

X'bec

[Amazon man]

Rider of the Purple Sage,

I know this is a rumour site but sometimes I do wonder whether Pprune is being used to fulfil some individuals personal agenda.

If you had been at the management briefing on Thursday last you would have heard some facts not rumour.

AM is not imminently off to BA if in fact you bothered to ask him he will tell you that he expects to be in BACX for approximately another 18 months. TDLF also has no plans for an immediate departure, having overseen the merger of BRAL and Brymon he has stated that he wants to be around to see the airline returned to profitability and requipped with an all jet fleet of preferably EMB 170/190's, neither AM or TDLF are to my knowledge booked on imminent B777 courses.

BACX has still some way to go before returning to profitability although TDLF stated that he and the management team have been able to present to BA mainline cost savings which amount to a large proportion of what BA mainline management have asked to see over the next 12 months, I will not include actual figures on a public forum but they are available just ask TDLF or AM.

BACX is not in danger of being closed down or sold in the very near future however at some point not too distant BA will want to see a turnaround into profit, what company wouldn't having spent £70 million + on purchasing BRAL in the first place.

What every employee needs to do now is to stop the them and us situation and yes I have been as guilty as anyone of blaming management for all our woes and problems, and start working to turn the company around. TDL has stated that this is possible but it is going to be a long road with maybe more changes ahead.

Maybe its time to admit that management are taking us in the right direction albeit slowly, at the end of this particular phase we may find ourselves better placed than a lot of other UK and European airlines. Whatever happens I am sure that along with many other BACX employees I recognise the management have a tough job one that I wouldn't want for all the tea in China.

If this site is going to be used for company rumours then the least you can assure is that they are well researched and not based on what a friend of a friend heard whilst standing at a bar on the other side of the world. If you want to know the facts then phone and speak to the gentlemen concerned you might find yourself a little more enlightened

[145qrh]

Amazon man , this is not the place to slag off fellow pilots, however, your post is well intentioned but if you believe what PH, TDLF etc say to us then you must be either one of them or are a sucker for a good story.


Trust is a 2 way thing ,and very few people trust BACX management (loose term I know) and with damn good reason, just ask any turbo prop pilot in the company or now with Eastern.

Now you expect us to turn round and say OK boys lets cut more costs as per your dream sheet. They spend a fortune trying to save a few pence here or there, a very British disease, and it will lead to the closure of most of BACX sooner than most realise.

[GOBWX]

quote
"what company wouldn't having spent £70 million + on purchasing BRAL in the first place."
unquote


£70 million isnt alot really especially when you can get 3 slots in and out of heathrow for it at the prime times.... and the chance to try and make some money on the side with your own regional airline....

what ever the out come ( i know whats happening to me) the management at LHR must be happy to of secured all those 319's 737's and got rid of those RJ100's



:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

as an after thought, id buy it/ into it i woulnt muck about either and yes i do think i could do a better job.

wx

[The Little Prince]

Amazon Man - I also think I could do better than our current crop of so-called managers.
If you want to believe what they say, then so be it, but I suggest you consider the latest 180 u turn over mainline access carefully. It shows at the very least that what they say one day is incorrect the next.

Ref AM, it may be he has a course in 1 or 18 months, but it does show where both he and TDLF consider their imminent future to be.

With ref the sell off rumour, well, I guess keeping us out of mainline is as good an indication as MOST of need.

I don't suppose you're one of these dodgy deals done over 'promised' training positions on the RJ are you? More dodgy handshaking going on between the select few methinks!

If not, again, you may wish to consider the trust you want to put in ANYTHING coming from our management. :mad:

[hostie]

(Quidnunc)
I would like to remind you and everyone that the first 'information' about the closure of PLH and NQY was here on PPRuNe, this was STRONGLY denied by BACX management, they even went as far to tell people that if they were to hear a rumour about them pulling out of NQY it was just a strategy to secure reduced charges similar to RyanAir.

The as if by magic the press drop the bombshell on a Friday and management finally get round to telling those affected on the Monday.

The actual closures on Oct 25th were handled as apallingly as everything else, did we really expect to have coverage in case of sickness and a management presence, not on a Saturday surely!

So my heart really does go out to those who are still hanging on to their jobs by the skin of their teeth, it may be time to jump before you're pushed!

Good Luck

:ok:

[HZ123]

Whatever the outcome or the reliability of the info there is little doubt amongst BA staff that cutbacks will be painfull once again this year ending and next year. We all await further announcements to that effect and there is no reason to doubt that the regions within the UK and thus BACX will have to make there contributions.

As has happened before LHR will be last on the list to make cuts and will suffer far less. One scheme already strongly points to outsourcing the staffing of all offline stations within the UK and mainland Europe, many of the stations having no directly employed BA reps. This will reflect far closely what the rest of the airlines are doing.

[Pontiuspilot]

I fear HZ is absolutely right. BACX will be closed down / given away rather than sold. Pity in many respects - including my job - because we are intrinsically cheaper to operate and hence more profitable than mainline as such.
(excluding Club and First long haul, but not much of that around over the pond these days!)
Trouble is, we are far weaker in union terms, pathetically weak in home grown management terms (all squabbling over their own futures as 'BA' managers) and unfortunately under the cosh of 'baby' mainline managers all trying to prove their virility by competeing to see who can swing the axe hardest.

Maybe, and its a big maybe, there may be something left at MAN/BHX to sell or give away, but don't hold your breath. If the thread about Mytravel is true, there could be the biggest surplus of qualified pilots around in living memory in the near future.

Xmas approaches, so doubtless so does an announcement again.:yuk:

[Bigpants]

"Cheaper and more profitable than mainline?"

Well ok what happened to yesterday evenings BRU MAN service then? From what I could see the glorious 4 engined regional jet was tech and the passengers had to be flown on an Airbus to LHR

In order to make a profit you have to provide a reliable service. How much has BA had to pay Titan this year in sub charter fees?

Safety is also something of an issue. How many RJ's have suffered from heavy landings this year? What are the costs of cancellations repairs and what damage does that do to the regional business?

If BACX is as good as some of you think... then this is just a rumour and you have nothing to fear... so don't bother replying to the above.
Regards BP

[Tandemrotor]

Hi Bigpants

I think I see where you are coming from. But I was in BHX when the Scarebus arrived, and I don't remember it's reliability being too fantastic at the time!

As far as heavy landings are concerned, I guess you are referring to 'tail scrapes' which I believe involve mostly LCY.

Can't remember the last time I saw an airbus on the ramp there!

As I said, I think I see where you are coming from, just try to rise above it!

Incidentally Pontiuspilot, if BACX doesn't make money, how can it be cheaper OR more profitable than Mainline??!

[Bigpants]

Tailscrapes! Just what do you chaps define as a tailscrape? I heard the last event at LCY required the tail to be scraped off the runway and stuck back on the jet.

But just for the record how many "tailscrapes" this year? What was the Bill and most importantly why?

Clearly there are some very experienced operators of the RJ about.....but are you employing them sensibly? From what I have heard you have a number of very inexperienced RJ pilots being sent to the City on little more than a wing and a prayer.

My other concern would be the quality of management and dare I say it leadership. Has TDLF qualified on the RJ yet? How many command hours does he have on any fixed wing commercial jets?

A management pilot does not have to be the "best" pilot but in order to maintain credibility he or she has to be competent and current.

If you have suffered a number of tailscrapes this year then you have a safety problem. That needs to be recognised and dealt with by management that at least fly the jet now and again.
Regards BP

[145qrh]

I think most of the RJ skippers are ex-mainline, in one form or another , and for quite a few it's there first command.

Now what does that tell us............


Answers on a postcard please.Blue Peter badge to the most absurd answer ..

[Ace Rimmer]

IF BA were smart they would flog off BACX and let it be a franchise operation with it's own competant management (it works elsewhere and worked before). There is a chance that the company may indeed do that - European mainlines tend to follow what US mainlines do with their regionals and across the pond they are flogging as fast as they can (although this has been slowed by the lack of popularity of airline IPOs on Wall St in the last two years).

Of course, it's BA we're talking about here, so the chances are rather than do the smart thing and flog it they'll probably just let it wither on the vine and then close it (already starting to happen if you think about it to the great joy of Richard and Brian).

[Bigpants]

Have to agree with you Ace. It is a pity, because although BACX was made up of small companies that appeared to be well run and at least reasonably happy. When BA combined them under their own management it has failed to produce the goods.

I would continue to question the quality of the original business plan and the ability of the management team to implement it.

As per the tail scrapes I have yet to find any organisation that has a monolpoly on the best pilots! Mainline standards are high and the training is very good but I think even an above the average pilot would find it hard to convert to the RJ and then be sent to the City. The question is are BACX using their resources sensibly? Why not give new crew a chance to gain experience before sending them into LCY?

It is a basic tenet of Health and Safety Law that Expediency should never take precedence over safety. Recent events suggest otherwise at BACX.
Regards BP

[Amazon man]

With all due respect what a bunch of whingers and moaners not to mention old women.

Stop writing off the company and start doing your best to turn it around, spreading doom and gloom and its all over scenario's isn't going to change things.

If you hadn't noticed the whole airline industry is in a pile of the messy stuff at the moment, stop the whining and lets all pull together in the same direction. And please don't lets go down the road of who has the better airline pilots this is all rather old hat and childish.

If you have serious concerns about tail scrape incidents approach the training department with them and ask.

Thank god it was my fathers generation that took the beaches at Normandy and not some of you guys, your approach its seems would have been 'looks at bit dangerous out there on the beach lets turn around and get back on the boat'.

If you don't have anything positive to say then keep it to yourself, some of us have many years invested in this airline and very much want to see it succeed.

[Ace Rimmer]

Amazon man: Hmm landing craft...let's see...yep remember those...bouncy thing you get wet in...

What I was saying was that in common with other regionals that have been bought my majors BACX is in a bit of a pickle and probably the best thing for the company and the JOBS would be if it were sold and got it's own (and good management). Sounds like sorting the company out don't you think?

I suspect that sadly that will not be the case with CitiExpress thanks to neglect by Big BA management - Who don't really appear to have a regional strategy apart from give up routes.

Ask yourself this question "What's happened to those routes?

Answer A well managed cost controlled and flexible airline has taken them over and is making a lot of money on them - see the difference?

[HZ123]

Prior to BACX the likes of CityFlyer, BRAL etc were run very well and all to my knowledge made a profit. I concede that at times the staff were not so happy.

As some of you have said trying to amalgamate four airlines with differing work practise and custom is dificult particularly when some are not pulling in the same direction whether intended or not.

I beleive the particular problems have also arisen from the LCs that have taken off over the last 5 years and have caused BACX particular problems on UK and European routes with vast numbers of seats for sale, not to mention the considerable number of problems it has caused BA mainline Surely this has been a problem made far worst when trying to compete and make major changes to the BACX profile.

I particularly agree with Mr Rimmers last paragraph.

[Bigpants]

Amazon Man in keeping with the season and your love of the Military a little poetry

The General

"Good-morning; good morning!" the General said

When we met him last week on our way to the line.

Now the soldiers he smiled at are most of 'em dead,

And we're cursing his staff for incompetent swine.

"He's a cheery old card" grunted Harry to Jack

As they slogged up to Arras with rifle and pack

* * * * *

But he did for them both by his plan of attack.


Siegried Sassoon

[Skylion]

BA has not handled its shorthaul and provincial opportunities well.
CFE and BRAL were profitable and at no cost to BA provided them with incremental revenue and a presence in a wide variety of places that someone with the cost structure and general lack of flexibility BA mainline could never successfully reach.
BA mainline at Gatwick should have been rolled into CFE and left as an independent franchise run by its own management. At the very least that would have given BA an extensive LGW network at no cost to itself and with some revenue and franchise fee benefits.
Go was probably the future of shorthaul but ditched to give focus to mainline shorthaul which, with its costs, is probably long term a lost cause. EZY, Ryan, FlyBE, Eastern are all on the advance with new routes, new bases, and mostly big fleet orders. Where is BAs future expansion plan? General retreat can hardly be motivating . Revenue usually comes out faster than costs so whats left gets into deeper trouble unless theres a fundamental and total restructure and refocus.
Do we see BOAC in the crystal ball?

[Dewdrop]

How about BACX competing on price ! This seem to be a big no no. I have been on empty planes time and time again and am always asked to pay high fares. Take the LC carriers on or admit defeat, but for Gods sake do something !

[Tandemrotor]

Bigpants

What exactly is your problem mate?

Like it or not, big BA sold the regional scarebus operation down the river. Inspite of the fact that it was profitable!

Balpa either couldn't, or couldn't be bothered, to stop the loss of 100 or so mainline jobs.

You had the chance to stay on, but presumably are now 'enjoying' shorthaul out of CC!

Some of us decided to 'opt in', and now 'enjoy' working alongside the likes of 145qrh, and his sort, who love giving us stick from the bacx side!

Yes, for some of us this is indeed our first command, (with 10,000hrs, does that make us inexperienced?) I don't remember the scarebus arrival at brum being too different!!

We are indeed operating into LCY incredibly soon after our final check. I struggle to think of a more challenging airfield to operate into, or out of (perhaps a little more time on 'carriers would have helped!)

I have to tell you (assuming you have no relevant experience) your comments about RJ ops into LCY by BACX, have the vaguest whiff of sour grapes about them!

We would have been, indeed some ARE the very same pilots, who operated the BAR 319s!

I already said to you, I think I understand where you are coming from. It is very easy to rise to the disinformation spread, deliberately, or otherwise, comparing the BAR operation with BACX! Best to ignore it mate!

Dewdrop - I think one of the reasons prices (and advertising) policy seems a little strange, is that - from LCY at least - we are also competing with BA routes out of LHR, and LGW! Are you getting the picture!

And although I know I too should rise above it....

145qrh -

Why don't you award YOURSELF a Blue Peter badge by telling US what you are on about! If you meant to connect tailscrapes at LCY with mainline secondees, you may wish to check your stats!

So c'mon, don't just go silent on us!!

[hostie]

So was anyone actually at the BCG meeting in MAN today?

Does anyone have a copy of the announcement that's just been given to staff?

It seems that management have started to filter the information through at last

Be prepared - if PLH and NQY are anything to go by, there will be some very serious consequences.

The axe is going to fall somewhere and it may not only be ATPs

Good luck to all in BACX
and could those people that are in a fortunate position to not be affected, please show some consideration for those who are!
:(

[In trim]

BACX never was, or is, going to work. CFE, Brymon, etc. made money and were successful, but the margins were still relatively thin.......and as soon as BA costs started being loaded on, these margins were always going to be totally eroded.

.....and that's before you take into account the impact of the lo-cost brigade in the past few years.

BA will continue their retreat to become increasingly LHR-centric, and then in a year or so they'll decide they need to increase their presence in 'marginal' areas via the only cost-effective way of doing it....franchising!

:confused:

[Jet A1]

BA mainline at Gatwick should have been rolled into CFE and left as an independent franchise run by its own management. At the very least that would have given BA an extensive LGW network at no cost to itself and with some revenue and franchise fee benefits.

Seems Big Rod now sees LGW as the sinking ship it is and fancies doing as you said skylion. Instead of CFE though its GB that are gonna get dumped on to try and make LGW a success even if it means turning GB from a profit making airline to a loss maker !

Done it before so why change a habit of shafting small independent PROFIT making airlines ???

[Cruise Alt]

BIGPANTS

If you are going to make who has the higher standard pilot comments let's look at some evidence. I assume form your comments you are one of those mainline BA types who can't find your way to the aircraft without being in a bus.

1. If you ask the lady who was taken off a BA mainline 767 flight to Budapest yesterday, unconscious and with a bleeding head due to a heavy landing ( in calm conditions ) causing multiple overhead lockers to shed their contents, she would not share your opinion of BA pilot infallibility. And that was on a long runway with a 3 degree glide slope.

2. If you check the history of LCY it was the Brymon DHC 7s that paved the way by landing on the dockside to demonstrate the feasibility of building an airport there. So, what became of the pilots who pioneered this. They ended up in BACX. So, with all this experience already in the company who is chosen to fly the RJ into LCY. It is the seconded BA mainline pilots we are lumbered with who have spent the whole 5 years of their career flying the Airbus electric jet from one 2 mile runway to another. Could this have anything to do with the tailscrapes?

(Meanwhile what has happened to the Brymon pilots with over 15000 hours of regional experience. Well BA in it's wisdom has stated that they are not good enough for their jets and the majority have opted to join Air Southwest. Those who have stayed are being treated well. The pilot who is number 1 on the BACX seniority list has been offered the Right hand seat of an Emb 145)

Now, about BA selling BACX. Good. Without their interference we might all be able to get back to making a profit like BRAL and Brymon did before.

[Capt.Slog]

Well that's the first blow done.

End of the line for the ATP's. Wish you luck guys (and girls).

Which fleet next?
Or will it be the company?

[Mark Lewis]

BACX have already announced that they will be all jet by 2005 so it will be the Dash 8s next.

[Lefthander]

Cruise Alt

Check your facts, or shut up

1. as a BA secondee, I have flown the RJ longer than most....was on it before it came to BACX
2. I have flown for BA for approaching 14 years, 11 in the regions
3. of that 11 years many years on BA turboprops into LSI/ORK etc
4. NO BA pilot has scraped a tail in BACX...........FACT
5. I can find an aeroplane without going on a bus..........I have for 11 years


I am no alone, there many secondees who have had the same experience as above.

Cruise Alt you are an arse and give the very good BACX pilots who are keen, enthuisiastic, and competant a bad name

toodle pip

Big Pants

You gotta problem with BACX trying to make a success out of London city flying? perhaps you could do better if you were in charge.

FACT only two tail strikes have been attributed to LCY

FACT no "tail" has been re-attached to the fuselage.........thats some point you made on a public forum..........got the facts to hand ??

You seem very bitter about life...........got your bid wrong??

toodlepip

[Ace Rimmer]

All jet you say...by 2005 you say...See that's a classic example of dumb-@r$e 'big airline' thinking that has caused the mess in the first place.
The "we want to be all-jet, jets are cool' philosophy just dosent stand up to a cold business assesment as history teaches us...

But I reckon In trim has it right, the withering will continue until some bright waterside spark looks deep into his or her skinny latte and thinks "I've got it FRANCHISING!!!"

Still I suppose it's just the latest chapter in the what is rapidly becoming a very long book "the BA book of management cock-ups"

[Essell]

I normally stay out of these kind of debates due to the utter b*ll*cks that comes from some peoples keyboards. However I want to make few points

A few years ago 10 Airbus, a type already operated by BA were introduced into BAR over 14 months with a year and a half planning. Certainly the best way to do it if you have a choice however BACX didn't have the luxury and introduced a brand new fleet of 16 RJ in six months with six months planning before-hand. At the same time it was commercially imperative to go into LCY. That too was accomplished. A fantastic achievement.

BACX have had 4 RJ tailscrapes during introduction. Only two at LCY. Pilots from each group were involved. Some were nothing more than paint abrasions and appear to have happened during take-off rather than landing. The most severe external damage involved part of the sacrificial protection strip being removed. ie it did its job. CFE had 4 tailscrapes during introduction of the type into CFE. Other airlines have similarly suffered in the past with the type.

Brymon made all its profit from 2 areas. The GLA/EDI routes from BRS and the wet-leased Embraer operation for BAR in BHX. The GLA/EDIs were hugely affected by GO competing on the routes from 2000 (just before BACX was formed) and the wet-lease work meant Brymon got paid for the work whether there were passengers on the aircraft or not. Take those crutches away and Brymon would have been bankrupt. Arguably would be now if it hadn't been absorbed by BACX.

BRAL made a huge part of any profit it had from the wet-lease operation it conducted for BAR in MAN. It had other profitable routes but it also flew a load of really crappy routes because it had committed itself to a collection of turbo-prop aircraft at quite staggeringly high lease rates. Move on a few years, with the extra competition around and those routes with those aircraft are unprofitable. Should BACX fly routes when they lose money ? - No. Nothing to do with poor revenue management just high lease costs vs. too much capacity and low fares in the market place. If BAR had taken the wet-lease flying away from BRAL and not merged it into BACX my guess is that it would have found it difficult to stay in business.

BACX is in a market where nobody is making money in the 50 - 100 seat section. The ex-employees of BRAL/Manx/Brymon should thank their lucky stars that their ex-Companies are now supported by the bank balance of BA. I'm sure it won't go on forever. BA need to see BACX make a profit. I'm sure that the closures that have been announced so far are intended to stem the losses. I hope it works. BACX is a lot better placed to survive than many of its competitors.

[Dewdrop]

No surprise I know but this appeared on the Manx radio web site this morning:


BA CitiExpress are to drop four of their routes to the Isle of Man in the Spring.

Those are currently operated by ATP aircraft, which are being dropped from the fleet.

The routes being axed are to Birmingham, Dublin, Glasgow and Liverpool, going in April 2004.

BA CitiExpress will be left with what they term their key business routes, Gatwick, Luton and Manchester.

But they say they are actively talking with carriers who are interested in taking up the routes they are dropping.

Transport Minister, John Shimmin, is putting a positive slant on things, saying that the announcement opens up the routes for carriers who see this as an opportunity and not, though he does'nt say so, as something of a financial millstone.

One airline obviously enthusiastic to be involved in the Liverpool route is Emerald, which is currently a freight carrier only.

Their CEO, Mick O' Brien, says the right arrangement needs to be made, particulary regarding passenger tax, to make to route viable.

The possiblity of job losses is still to be discussed.

Transport and General Workers Union District Secretary, Bernard Moffat, was at a meeting with the Airline yesterday in Manchester, but no word has come out of that meeting as yet.

On the positive side, David Evans, Managing Director, BA CitiExpress, says they will continue to invest in " our highly successful engineering base in the Isle of Man and we expect to announce some specific plans in the near future.

[wayward]

Apparently BACX management were not going to make the announcement about the ATPs today,despite the deal being done and dusted and the union reps informed today at a BCCG.The mangement wanted to keep it secret from the workforce for at least another 2 weeks and only made the announcement when the guys there insisted very strongly that they should announce it today rather than prolong the agony of those it will affect.
Don`t you just love secrets?:mad:

[Mark Lewis]

I assume then that the MAN route will run from MAN using initally Dash 8s, and then after their retirement 145/146 equipment?
Also does anyone know what is happening with G-MIMA about her supposed return to the lessor?

[faq]

Is Essell AKA Tim de la Fosse? The writing style is the same