Originally Posted by VickersVicount
(Post 11478620)
quite a lot of capacity to UK now on Ethiopian. Wonder if LGW route would impact on MAN service numbers which is also due for increase. Im guessing some overlap. Direct maybe preferable to double drop in Switzerland.
|
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11479875)
Surely the LHR service would have more of an impact on MAN than LGW? Not sure where the overlap would be?
|
I never think about the Midlands! :O
And the MAN flights don't seem any cheaper than LHR |
Originally Posted by JW95
(Post 11479873)
I wouldn't be surprised to see them increase frequency on some of the existing routes that are currently only one daily or less. JFK, LAX and MIA come to mind.
|
Delta Airlines
Delta is to suspend LGW-JFK for the winter.
Source: |
…expect more of this to come
|
Originally Posted by VickersVicount
(Post 11484015)
…expect more of this to come
|
Check out the difference between London Gatwick and London Stansted departures this afternoon, on Flightradar24, following the UK ATC failure.
Gatwick EZY and BA short haul almost all cancelled whilst nearly all Stansted scheduled flights (particularly Jet2 and Ryanair) operating (albeit with delays) and just the occasional RYR cancellation. |
Originally Posted by Cuillin Hills
(Post 11493016)
Check out the difference between London Gatwick and London Stansted departures this afternoon, on Flightradar24, following the UK ATC failure.
Gatwick EZY and BA short haul almost all cancelled whilst nearly all Stansted scheduled flights (particularly Jet2 and Ryanair) operating (albeit with delays) and just the occasional RYR cancellation. |
Originally Posted by AVGEEK7812
(Post 11493062)
STN departures get out on time usually aswell for the most part. LGW is a disgrace. LGW-SNN for example is always delayed and has a knock on affect in SNN threw out the day.
an ATC equipment failure not an airport failure. |
Originally Posted by vectisman
(Post 11493150)
For goodness sake get some perspective! The operations at Gatwick are greater and more sophisticated than those at Stansted. There were many more aircraft and crews out of position plus lots of aircraft stuck at gates. It was also
an ATC equipment failure not an airport failure. Pity you cant take someone elses opinion. Typcial cheeky pprune reply |
Originally Posted by vectisman
(Post 11493150)
For goodness sake get some perspective! The operations at Gatwick are greater and more sophisticated than those at Stansted. There were many more aircraft and crews out of position plus lots of aircraft stuck at gates. It was also
an ATC equipment failure not an airport failure. |
Don't know how up to date this is, a quick Google says RYR STN 43, EZY LGW 84 units.
|
Originally Posted by pabely
(Post 11493324)
Don't know how up to date this is, a quick Google says RYR STN 43, EZY LGW 84 units.
|
Originally Posted by AirLCY
(Post 11493388)
RYR sounds low, but don’t forget the away based aircraft make up a huge proportion of the flying compared to EZY at LGW
|
First EZY domestic arrivals at LGW will often then do a European mainline leg(s) and might not return to it's overnight base until much later in the day.
Thus more complicated than RYR which would just be back to it's base and then another sector from it's base. |
Originally Posted by pabely
(Post 11493510)
First EZY domestic arrivals at LGW will often then do a European mainline leg(s) and might not return to it's overnight base until much later in the day.
Thus more complicated than RYR which would just be back to it's base and then another sector from it's base. |
Originally Posted by AirportPlanner1
(Post 11493601)
If an aircraft is based elsewhere so has less exposure to LGW that actually gives less excuse for delay, not more.
|
Originally Posted by pabely
(Post 11493618)
Like the RUK BFS & EDI first arrivals into STN today which were canx?
|
slightly surprised LGW still down 15% pax numbers vs pre covid. Sounded like they were otherwise going gangbusters.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:34. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.