Totally hypothetical and would never happen but do you think a new airport i between Cardiff and Newport or on the old Llanwern Steel works (which has been discussed in the past as Severnside) would be more successful than where the airport currently is?
As much as the WAG will not let the airport fail I just don’t see much of a way back for CWL unfortunately. |
Originally Posted by shlamps
(Post 11371497)
Totally hypothetical and would never happen but do you think a new airport i between Cardiff and Newport or on the old Llanwern Steel works (which has been discussed in the past as Severnside) would be more successful than where the airport currently is?
As much as the WAG will not let the airport fail I just don’t see much of a way back for CWL unfortunately. Also, that location is even nearer Bristol, which would mean Lulsgate closing. Who would pay the compensation? |
Isn't the way to fix CWL a good road link to the M4?
|
https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/ne...stol-airports/
That was the plan. But it, ahem, never got off the ground. It would mean the closure of Bristol and Cardiff. Logically it makes sense as BRS itself is outgrowing it's own land and Cardiff is struggling. One Airport serving the whole South West and Wales, right alongside the M4 and the South Wales mainline would best serve everyone. But it needed to be done 20 years ago. |
Originally Posted by LGS6753
(Post 11371626)
No. For one thing, I can't see a brand new airport anywhere until the climate nonsense is discredited.
Also, that location is even nearer Bristol, which would mean Lulsgate closing. Who would pay the compensation? |
And if you look through the local newspaper archives, Burtonwood could have replaced Speke and Ringway, Usworth could have replaced Woolsington and Middleton St George, a central lowlands airport could have replaced Turnhouse and Abbotsinch, etc, etc
|
No doubt us taxpayers will come to the rescue again and when the cash injection brings Cardiff to profitability again some years down the line it will be quickly sold to private companies at a loss, thats how it works..socialism for big business..poor supporting the rich
Im sick of it |
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11371911)
And if you look through the local newspaper archives, Burtonwood could have replaced Speke and Ringway, Usworth could have replaced Woolsington and Middleton St George, a central lowlands airport could have replaced Turnhouse and Abbotsinch, etc, etc
|
everyone is against everything in the UK
|
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 11372180)
everyone is against everything in the UK
|
Originally Posted by LGS6753
(Post 11371626)
No. For one thing, I can't see a brand new airport anywhere until the climate nonsense is discredited.
Also, that location is even nearer Bristol, which would mean Lulsgate closing. Who would pay the compensation? |
The problems with building new airports in the UK started years before the "climate nonsense"
Once a) you gave everyone a vote & b) made owning a house the be all and end all of accumulating wealth ANY change to an area has met visceral opposition - no matter what it is. Just go back over "London's Third Airport" in the '60's. No-one, but no-one wants a new airport (or anything else) built near their house. And politicians listen as they need the votes |
Looks like a cold wind blowing....
The Welsh government said all future roads must pass strict criteria which means they must not increase carbon emissions, they must not increase the number of cars on the road, they must not lead to higher speeds and higher emissions, and they must not negatively impact the environment. |
Volotea
Volotea are doing some flights from CWL to LYS & NTE in September & October this year…..all for the Rugby World Cup held in France.
|
Looking at flight radar 24 makes sad reading. Only 2 Amsterdam flights per day plus one, two or three other scheduled flights. it must be desperately quiet in the terminal at times when the 0600 flight goes and the next scheduled departure is 1710. Should the CAA do another airspace review and remove or reclassify much of the airspace ? Class "A" ( reserved for busy or complex areas) is probably over the top for the current traffic levels given that on some days there is absolutely no traffic from the north or west at all and only Thursday this week sees one from north and one from the west ( ish).
|
Try looking at Teesside…nothing at all..flight wise..and certainly nothing maintenance wise..but the local mayor is subsiding everything!
Do you guys Not have a mayor who could waste taxpayers /government money on your airport..a Capital city? I really wonder? |
"Do you guys Not have a mayor who could waste taxpayers /government money "
Unfortunately they have a partly devolved Govt - you'd think that would lead to more money for Cardiff but it actually means that Welsh politicians can all play their favourite game of damming Sin City by the Bay and squabbling amongst themselves over the pork barrel - hence the lunatic support for a service to Anglesey etc etc |
Sad to see the lack of demand from CWL. I have friends living in Cardiff and they wouldn't even consider CWL airport for their travel needs. They go to Bristol. They said it is easier to get to BRS. Hard to see who will invest in the place if Wizz cannot make a small base work.
|
Originally Posted by EI-BUD
(Post 11387010)
Sad to see the lack of demand from CWL. I have friends living in Cardiff and they wouldn't even consider CWL airport for their travel needs. They go to Bristol. They said it is easier to get to BRS. Hard to see who will invest in the place if Wizz cannot make a small base work.
|
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 11372180)
everyone is against everything in the UK
I don't think recent high end resignations including at the world Bank have much to do with the published reasons, those people know whats coming |
Originally Posted by EI-BUD
(Post 11387010)
Sad to see the lack of demand from CWL. I have friends living in Cardiff and they wouldn't even consider CWL airport for their travel needs. They go to Bristol. They said it is easier to get to BRS. Hard to see who will invest in the place if Wizz cannot make a small base work.
|
Bit baffled as to why Loganair have not gone double daily between CWL & EDI considering the promising loads pre-Covid. At one time there were x3 B737-300 flights a day with BMI baby and now there is just x1 EM4 / AT4 a day.
All other regional airports seem to be recovering slowly except for CWL. Loganair are due to start double daily flights between EDI & EXT so surely they can be targeted for CWL too ?? Loganair said following their fall out with NQY that they would focus on SOU, EXT & CWL and we seem the only one not to have increased frequencies…. |
Originally Posted by Letsflycwl
(Post 11393632)
Bit baffled as to why Loganair have not gone double daily between CWL & EDI considering the promising loads pre-Covid. At one time there were x3 B737-300 flights a day with BMI baby and now there is just x1 EM4 / AT4 a day.
All other regional airports seem to be recovering slowly except for CWL. Loganair are due to start double daily flights between EDI & EXT so surely they can be targeted for CWL too ?? Loganair said following their fall out with NQY that they would focus on SOU, EXT & CWL and we seem the only one not to have increased frequencies…. |
Originally Posted by Letsflycwl
(Post 11393632)
Bit baffled as to why Loganair have not gone double daily between CWL & EDI considering the promising loads pre-Covid.
Whilst you may plead the case that CWL-EDI is profitable (I don't know whether it is or not), that is not enough. In order to be selected for expansion, it has to be MORE lucrative than ANY alternative use of the available scarce ATR or Embraer. My guess is that it isn't even close to top pick. Take a look at the number of commuter aircraft operated by British Isles carriers in mid-2019 and contrast that with the equivalent fleet strength today. That's the real problem. The UK doesn't have a really big regional airline any longer. The remaining commuter types are spread thinly. |
Reported elsewhere that Qatar Airways are due to make an announcement on 07/03/2023 with new routes……
Could we see a resumption of services for CWL after all the service was only “suspended” as a result of Covid and not “terminated”….CWL really needs to get them back !! |
Originally Posted by Letsflycwl
(Post 11394166)
Reported elsewhere that Qatar Airways are due to make an announcement on 07/03/2023 with new routes……
Could we see a resumption of services for CWL after all the service was only “suspended” as a result of Covid and not “terminated”….CWL really needs to get them back !! |
Originally Posted by Letsflycwl
(Post 11394166)
Reported elsewhere that Qatar Airways are due to make an announcement on 07/03/2023 with new routes……
Could we see a resumption of services for CWL after all the service was only “suspended” as a result of Covid and not “terminated”….CWL really needs to get them back !! |
Originally Posted by ATNotts
(Post 11397036)
Sadly not listed in Qatar's press release for S23.
Maybe S24 if at all… |
Qatar
Just curious as to why Qatar chose Cardiff over Bristol in the first place? Not wanting to ignite a Cardiff vs Bristol storyline, just with BRS handing considerably more passengers, having a bigger catchment area, and being able to handle 787s, it always seemed an odd choice. Bristol must be in TK’s or EK’s sights? Kind regards BristolexFlyer |
Originally Posted by BristolexFlyer
(Post 11397123)
Qatar
Just curious as to why Qatar chose Cardiff over Bristol in the first place? Not wanting to ignite a Cardiff vs Bristol storyline, just with BRS handing considerably more passengers, having a bigger catchment area, and being able to handle 787s, it always seemed an odd choice. Bristol must be in TK’s or EK’s sights? Kind regards BristolexFlyer |
Originally Posted by BristolexFlyer
(Post 11397123)
Qatar
Just curious as to why Qatar chose Cardiff over Bristol in the first place? Not wanting to ignite a Cardiff vs Bristol storyline, just with BRS handing considerably more passengers, having a bigger catchment area, and being able to handle 787s, it always seemed an odd choice. Bristol must be in TK’s or EK’s sights? Kind regards BristolexFlyer |
Originally Posted by BristolexFlyer
(Post 11397123)
Qatar
Just curious as to why Qatar chose Cardiff over Bristol in the first place? Not wanting to ignite a Cardiff vs Bristol storyline, just with BRS handing considerably more passengers, having a bigger catchment area, and being able to handle 787s, it always seemed an odd choice. Bristol must be in TK’s or EK’s sights? Kind regards BristolexFlyer |
Bristol must be in TK’s or EK’s sights? Would be nice to see CWL get Qatar back but we shall see. |
Originally Posted by BristolexFlyer
(Post 11397123)
Qatar
Just curious as to why Qatar chose Cardiff over Bristol in the first place? Not wanting to ignite a Cardiff vs Bristol storyline, just with BRS handing considerably more passengers, having a bigger catchment area, and being able to handle 787s, it always seemed an odd choice. Bristol must be in TK’s or EK’s sights? Kind regards BristolexFlyer |
Originally Posted by FRatSTN
(Post 11397173)
I imagine once EK get their 787-9's then BRS could be a contender for them? Right now they don't have suitable aircraft.
Would be nice to see CWL get Qatar back but we shall see. |
Originally Posted by chinapattern
(Post 11397185)
The CWL-DOH flights were subsidised by the Welsh Government IIRC.
|
QR back to CWL..
https://www.businesstraveller.com/bu...rn-to-cardiff/ |
Originally Posted by VickersVicount
(Post 11397221)
QR back to CWL..
https://www.businesstraveller.com/bu...rn-to-cardiff/ |
Originally Posted by shlamps
(Post 11397445)
brilliant news! Nothing is confirmed until confirmed but as CWL had very similar prices and loads to BHX there’s no reason why it shouldn’t do well again.
Just need a Paris route next !! Far prefer CDG over AMS…. |
Originally Posted by Letsflycwl
(Post 11397904)
Sounds promising indeed with a special reference to CWL which was good - let’s hope it happens.
Just need a Paris route next !! Far prefer CDG over AMS…. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:58. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.