Originally Posted by pug
(Post 11628921)
Why are HUY, NME and let’s not forget SOU (which you now neglect to mention) poor comparisons? SEN too?
How is the number of airlines not relevant? It is directly relevant and is why all examples I’ve just provided have lost market share to other airports. Why? Because most airlines have chosen to consolidate at fewer, larger departure points. That is why, even though more passengers are travelling now than 20 years ago, they’re flying with a smaller number of airlines and those airlines have chosen not to fly from CWL but BRS and cannot justify flying from both. You can of course choose to disagree if you wish, but I’m offering empirical evidence and you appear stuck in a mindset not fitting of today’s operating environment. I suggest to you therefore that what CWL needs in order to grow in the way you appear to be championing, is new airlines entering the U.K. market, not a better management team at the airport. So, if I follow your train of thought through - the large airlines have chosen BRS and won’t operate at CWL and I don’t see new entrants into the UK market, then the aviation related business of CWL looks pretty bleak. I don’t see how non aviation businesses can make the airport a viable going concern. i am going to bow out of the discussion as it would seem a lot of people feel management and leadership are entirely passive to the aviation part of this business. I take a different view as a customer of the airport and a taxpayer would like to see change and more transparent communication about a recovery business plan - whether that be aviation or non aviation growth. At the moment I see nothing and would like to see more than the maintenance of the status quo. |
Originally Posted by TOM100
(Post 11629021)
I don’t see HUY or MME as being so relevant as they have never really been of a size (pax wise) comparable to CWL. I made some points about SOU and SEN in earlier posts.
So, if I follow your train of thought through - the large airlines have chosen BRS and won’t operate at CWL and I don’t see new entrants into the UK market, then the aviation related business of CWL looks pretty bleak. I don’t see how non aviation businesses can make the airport a viable going concern. . I absolutely get that Wales wants its capital to have a thriving airport but it isn't always possible. Take Bratislava as an example, overshadowed by Vienna, or Ljubljana neither of which enjoy enormously successful airports. Best hope is for Cardiff to develop a niche for itself over and above passenger traffic. There is already the BA maintenance facility. Perhaps cargo could also be attracted, the freight sector isn't served by BRS to any degree. |
Originally Posted by TOM100
(Post 11629021)
I don’t see HUY or MME as being so relevant as they have never really been of a size (pax wise) comparable to CWL. I made some points about SOU and SEN in earlier posts.
So, if I follow your train of thought through - the large airlines have chosen BRS and won’t operate at CWL and I don’t see new entrants into the UK market, then the aviation related business of CWL looks pretty bleak. I don’t see how non aviation businesses can make the airport a viable going concern. i am going to bow out of the discussion as it would seem a lot of people feel management and leadership are entirely passive to the aviation part of this business. I take a different view as a customer of the airport and a taxpayer would like to see change and more transparent communication about a recovery business plan - whether that be aviation or non aviation growth. At the moment I see nothing and would like to see more than the maintenance of the status quo. That is why I can’t see how you conclude that the management are passive. You can’t attract business that doesn’t exist! I agree though, you have every right to question them as a tax payer, but they may find that other aviation revenue is needed and they can double down on the routes that are currently successful like the KLM. |
Surely the economy and supply & demand play a bigger part in CWLs fortunes rather than the management or WG? Do we honestly think the management and WG want to run it into the ground to do themselves out of jobs and lose millions in investment on purpose?
As much as I want to see CWL thrive, we have the be realistic. Airlines are businesses and will invest where they can make money. At the moment there is obviously no confidence in the South Wales economy so they won’t take the risk. if you owned a thriving shop in one location, would you open another where you may or may not make money just for the convenience of a small minority who will travel to your thriving shop anyway? I wouldn’t until I had the confidence and research that both would thrive. |
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11628808)
Absolutely - the easy option.
But look at TOM - expanding elsewhere but not at CWL, RYR - expanding elsewhere but not at CWL. What does that tell you? Maybe there is somenthing more fundamentally wrong than the social media strategy etc. Local economy, small/restricted catchement area, etc All airlines use social media really well, maybe CWL just isn't offering the same deals as other airports. |
Originally Posted by shlamps
(Post 11629312)
Surely the economy and supply & demand play a bigger part in CWLs fortunes rather than the management or WG? Do we honestly think the management and WG want to run it into the ground to do themselves out of jobs and lose millions in investment on purpose?
As much as I want to see CWL thrive, we have the be realistic. Airlines are businesses and will invest where they can make money. At the moment there is obviously no confidence in the South Wales economy so they won’t take the risk. if you owned a thriving shop in one location, would you open another where you may or may not make money just for the convenience of a small minority who will travel to your thriving shop? I wouldn’t until I had the confidence and research that both would thrive. I would love to see CWL as a major airport with a regular connection to NQY I could then fly to YVR as I do often without the trek to London. The area just can't sustain that. |
Originally Posted by SealinkBF
(Post 11629316)
I don't think it's all down to the airports social media.
All airlines use social media really well, maybe CWL just isn't offering the same deals as other airports. As for Vueling, Ryanair etc. Who knows? Posts on various forums about load factors are showing positive signs though. |
Is TUI maintaining 3 aircraft in CWL in 2025? I am wondering where they are getting the 2nd EXT aircraft from?
|
Originally Posted by shamrock7seal
(Post 11629814)
Is TUI maintaining 3 aircraft in CWL in 2025? I am wondering where they are getting the 2nd EXT aircraft from?
|
More Ryanair expansion at Bristol...
The fault is the Welsh Government. I doubt they even want a successful airport. Doing so would hurt the environment.... |
Originally Posted by Sean North
(Post 11633030)
More Ryanair expansion at Bristol...
The fault is the Welsh Government. I doubt they even want a successful airport. Doing so would hurt the environment.... Ryanair have expanded at CWL. On a much smaller scale but it's still growth. This constant comparison of CWL and BRS is tiring. You don't read similar articles comparing BRS and LHR or LGW. |
Originally Posted by Sean North
(Post 11633030)
More Ryanair expansion at Bristol...
The fault is the Welsh Government. I doubt they even want a successful airport. Doing so would hurt the environment.... |
Originally Posted by runway30
(Post 11634058)
What you fail to take into account is the market at CWL. As one low cost airline CEO said to me, I can fill 6 aircraft in the Summer but nothing in the Winter. Serving CWL from other bases is the sensible way to match capacity with demand.
|
Originally Posted by Sean North
(Post 11636894)
Airlines are not even doing that on any significant scale
|
Just posted by the ever brilliant @SeanM1997 on X so credit as always to him for the information
PLAY Reykjavík Keflavík to Cardiff. Flights start 10 October 2024 OG380 KEF 0645-0940 CWL (Mon & Fri) OG831 CWL 1040-1340 KEF (Mon & Fri) Should hopefully please a few of the Cardiff faithful after a thread of negativity. |
Fly Play
New route announced:
Fly Play - Cardiff - Iceland with connections to the US. Random dates available in October and November only, but hopefully will be made permanent in the future. |
Nice to see and read some good news for once about CWL, be it a small programme it is still a positive !!
Be great if CWL has the same success securing SunExpress as that would be even better and most probably a longer programme of flights too. I can see Play has been added to Wikipedia already - though Freebird are also operating for TUI this year to AYT (under their own flight numbers not TUI)…..can someone not add this onto Wikipedia too as they seem to be missed off the list. |
Originally Posted by caaardiff
(Post 11637925)
Random dates available in October and November only, but hopefully will be made permanent in the future. Play chief executive Einar Orn Olafsson said: “Our new route from Cardiff to Iceland is the first direct flight between the two destinations. Not only does this mark a milestone for Play, but also opens up exciting possibilities for customers wanting to travel to the US and Canada at affordable prices. Our new Cardiff route is ideal for families seeking to explore all that Iceland has to offer during the school half-term, as well as enthusiastic football fans eager to watch Iceland versus Wales in the upcoming Nations League later this year.” |
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11637969)
|
Excellent to see Play at CWL, but I find the dates and duration very odd, and if anything they restrict many potential PAX. A summer season with a proper schedule is needed if they are to gauge demand imo.
I hope I'm wrong, but I fear we'll have them for these few weeks then never see them again. |
Originally Posted by Letsflycwl
(Post 11637932)
Freebird are also operating for TUI this year to AYT (under their own flight numbers not TUI)…..can someone not add this onto Wikipedia too as they seem to be missed off the list.
Good to see Play trying out Cardiff, however limited. |
See Loganair are pulling the SOU-GLA route as a result of direct competition from EZY on the same route. Also pulling the ABZ-NCL & MME flights too.
Be great if Loganair started CWL-GLA or a second daily CWL-EDI instead !! |
Originally Posted by Letsflycwl
(Post 11641980)
Be great if Loganair started CWL-GLA or a second daily CWL-EDI instead !! |
Originally Posted by L1011effoh
(Post 11642198)
I admire your optimism. Short answer, not a chance. Long answer, read the press release and the reasons for cutting services.
Are CWL-EDI flights still booked to be the ERJ? |
Originally Posted by Letsflycwl
(Post 11641980)
See Loganair are pulling the SOU-GLA route as a result of direct competition from EZY on the same route. Also pulling the ABZ-NCL & MME flights too.
Be great if Loganair started CWL-GLA or a second daily CWL-EDI instead !! |
There's a nice sense of irony here. On one hand people defend Cardiff Airport by blaming it having an economically poor catchment area, whilst on the other hand celebrate a new service to one of Europe's most expensive tourist destinations.
Either these same people need to accept this new service will be a short-term disaster due to Iceland (and even the US if you're talking about connections) being too expensive for the poor people in the South Wales valleys, or accept the catchment area reason is simply an excuse and people will happily travel to an airport out of their way if the price is right and it's easy to use. |
Originally Posted by Sean North
(Post 11644946)
or accept the catchment area reason is simply an excuse and people will happily travel to an airport out of their way if the price is right and it's easy to use.
Based on BRS masterplan that said 20% of its passengers come from South Wales, which if still accurate in 2024 is about 2m passengers. What is unique about Play is although EZY compete to Iceland, there's no competition from BRS on flights to the US, so they may attract people from the Southwest. This route could go either way, will be interesting to see what happens with it. |
Originally Posted by caaardiff
(Post 11645113)
This is the most sensible reason.
Based on BRS masterplan that said 20% of its passengers come from South Wales, which if still accurate in 2024 is about 2m passengers. What is unique about Play is although EZY compete to Iceland, there's no competition from BRS on flights to the US, so they may attract people from the Southwest. This route could go either way, will be interesting to see what happens with it. Its a bit of a stretch at this stage to start getting exited about USA connections which would only become a serious opportunity should the service be extended to year round. |
Originally Posted by ATNotts
(Post 11645125)
I would suggest that, given the short season that Play are offering, the market they believe they have identified is the short break / Northern Lights one, not the North America hub over KEF.
Its a bit of a stretch at this stage to start getting exited about USA connections which would only become a serious opportunity should the service be extended to year round. Agreed the short break market will be the primary demand for the route but it does open up new opportunities. Although when WOW operated from BRS the connections weren't all that popular. |
With all these new routes to/from Turkey I’m surprised CWL has missed out. SunExpress, Pegasus, Corendon etc,
Turkey is a popular destination from CWL and has been for many years. I wonder if CWL have actively tried to secure a new airline like one of these? |
Glad to see that the year on year passenger numbers (terminal/transit) were up 30% for March. From a low base granted but one of the highest figures UK wide. A few more destinations/increased frequency and I think the habit of travelling from Cardiff will return to many.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:16. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.