Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 10716478)
When it comes to rescue packages which government pays for what at Easyjet? There is Easyjet Europe with its headquarters in Austria for inter EU traffic, Easyjet Switzerland and Easyjet UK which are all owned by Easyjet PLC which is actually EU owned and controlled but considered to be a British company.
Not sure it should be down to British tax payers to keep the whole group going. |
Not talking about getting passengers home I am talking about rescuing the airline.
|
Originally Posted by Chidken Sangwich
(Post 10716639)
No Government payments. There’s no cover for seat only Sched carriers. EZY would have to fund from their own pockets under duty of care to get their booked pax home.
Ryanair's Michael O'Leary was the person who negotiated with Spanish Govt to get Irish people on holidays in Spain back to Ireland, Ryanair and Aer Lingus have put on loads of flights with sole aim of getting people home. Let the airlines go bust and then watch none restart because there is no cash around. |
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 10716674)
Not talking about getting passengers home I am talking about rescuing the airline.
|
Just received an email from EZY, which has put its Winter schedule (to Feb 21) on sale early. It says "Until midnight on Tuesday 24/3/20, fares for our flights from 25th October 2020 - 28th February 2021 will be available at or below £29.99 one way per person."
|
Originally Posted by LGS6753
(Post 10718481)
Just received an email from EZY, which has put its Winter schedule (to Feb 21) on sale early. It says "Until midnight on Tuesday 24/3/20, fares for our flights from 25th October 2020 - 28th February 2021 will be available at or below £29.99 one way per person."
|
Originally Posted by LGS6753
(Post 10718481)
Just received an email from EZY, which has put its Winter schedule (to Feb 21) on sale early. It says "Until midnight on Tuesday 24/3/20, fares for our flights from 25th October 2020 - 28th February 2021 will be available at or below £29.99 one way per person."
Looking ahead, flights to canaries for £57 per person return from all over the UK. |
Originally Posted by JSCL
(Post 10718499)
Yep, looks like a cash grab to me.
Looking ahead, flights to canaries for £57 per person return from all over the UK. |
Was looking to book flights to either of SZG or INN from LON and, though the dates are loaded, when you pick a date it just comes up as NO FLIGHTS.
No flights loaded to MUC yet either |
Maybe not the right forum for my comment but air travel was one of the biggest contributors to global warming and it was growing fast. Most people don't care as long as they can get a cheap flight. Maybe this will give the world a chance to catch its breath.
|
air travel contributes 2%. it is a wonderfully easy target.
|
Maybe not the right forum for my comment but air travel was one of the biggest contributors to global warming and it was growing fast. air travel contributes 2%. it is a wonderfully easy target. |
Originally Posted by stewyb
(Post 10718508)
Yep and you can't blame them one bit for that. Survival of the fittest at the moment!
Yes, there are loads to the Canaries, Spain, Cyprus etc, for under £29 each way. However, domestic fares, which can only be viewed on the App, not the website, are through the roof, for example, the cheapest one-way fares in Jan/Feb 2021 on a random selection of routes are as follows:- IOM-LPL £91 LGW-JER £148 LPL-BFS £102 LGW-EDI £138 No-one is going to book at those prices, so if this is a cash flow thing, it's an odd way to go about it. |
Originally Posted by Tonyq
(Post 10719526)
Something very odd going on with EZY fares for 2021.
Yes, there are loads to the Canaries, Spain, Cyprus etc, for under £29 each way. However, domestic fares, which can only be viewed on the App, not the website, are through the roof, for example, the cheapest one-way fares in Jan/Feb 2021 on a random selection of routes are as follows:- IOM-LPL £91 LGW-JER £148 LPL-BFS £102 LGW-EDI £138 No-one is going to book at those prices, so if this is a cash flow thing, it's an odd way to go about it. |
Originally Posted by lfc84
(Post 10719857)
Some of those have little, if any, competition since the demise of flybe
|
Originally Posted by lfc84
(Post 10719857)
Some of those have little, if any, competition since the demise of flybe
FlyBe didn't fly to/from LTN, and LTN domestic routes (I looked at EDI, INV, ABZ) show the same patttern. Finally, I quote from their e-mail to customers, sent yesterday:- "Until midnight on Tuesday 24/3/20, fares for our flights from 25th October 2020 - 28th February 2021 will be available at or below £29.99 one way per person. These fares are available on our website to book now. The £29.99 or below fares apply to one way per person and are subject to availability. These fares are available on all winter flights launched for the dates 25.10.20 – 28.02.21 with the following exclusions: winter flights to and from Germany, Morocco, Egypt, Tunisia, Israel and Jordan will be available at a later date." |
Easy at BHX
W20/21 on sale and BHX-BFS increases to 23pw and BHX-GVA to 15pw as it stands BHX-GLA/EDI remaining the same as S20
|
Wouldn't get too excited about W20/21 schedules as there is a lot more water to go under the bridge before then.
|
Originally Posted by Spanish eyes
(Post 10718626)
Maybe not the right forum for my comment but air travel was one of the biggest contributors to global warming and it was growing fast. Most people don't care as long as they can get a cheap flight. Maybe this will give the world a chance to catch its breath.
Just for a bit of context - the Greta generation loves its social media. Nothing sums them up better than turning up at some protest and posting a picture to Insta (or whatever) with some pouting snowflakes under '#saving the planet' or some such crap. Or simply posting a meaningless photo of a plate of food to the cloud. So where is 'the cloud'? The cloud is a massive network of physical data warehouses that use VAST amounts of energy. Already some estimates put the global CO2 contribution from the cloud at more than 4% and growing exponentially. Aviation's 2% seems modest by comparision....and why does no-one mention the contribution from the world's shipping fleets that not only emit CO2 but also filthy black soot and other noxious fumes as well? This doesn't even include dumping vitually all their crap overboard or washing out empty tanks whilst out of sight on the high seas. Frankly aviation's 'sins' are relatively light weight compared to some of man's other activities. |
Originally Posted by FFMAN
(Post 10719972)
Wrong.
Just for a bit of context - the Greta generation loves its social media. Nothing sums them up better than turning up at some protest and posting a picture to Insta (or whatever) with some pouting snowflakes under '#saving the planet' or some such crap. Or simply posting a meaningless photo of a plate of food to the cloud. So where is 'the cloud'? The cloud is a massive network of physical data warehouses that use VAST amounts of energy. Already some estimates put the global CO2 contribution from the cloud at more than 4% and growing exponentially. Aviation's 2% seems modest by comparision....and why does no-one mention the contribution from the world's shipping fleets that not only emit CO2 but also filthy black soot and other noxious fumes as well? This doesn't even include dumping vitually all their crap overboard or washing out empty tanks whilst out of sight on the high seas. Frankly aviation's 'sins' are relatively light weight compared to some of man's other activities. Perhaps Covid 19 may shock the world into realising there's more to life than consumption and economic growth. Doubt it though. I am, by the way, well outside of the "Greta generation" and certainly don't use Instagram or any of the other social media platforms. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:45. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.