Originally Posted by mik3bravo
(Post 10235514)
I read that too on the Cityjet and the Aer Lingus and the City Airport thread. Good news if you ask me. Stobart Air receive 10/10 scorecard for ability to cock-up services. Those E195's are 10 or 11 years old and clearly have reliability problems.
|
Originally Posted by BA318
(Post 10235520)
Cityjet's RJ's have an average age of 19 years old and Cityjet aluso have issues occasionally with cancellations.
I have flown BEE about 12 times since they announced using those E195s and I can honestly say I've experienced 5 tech issues, 3 resulted in fairly significant delays, the other two they pulled both flights after stringing all the pax along for 3 to 4 hour tech delays. Me and pax left high and dry to try get back home to Essex. Ended up buying Are Lingus ticket to Gatwick and the other was Cityjet into City. Those Cityjet avro's are dated but plenty of them and they do an excellent job ensuring tech events are limited or rare. Whereas at Stobart Air, it's been a complete and utter disaster running those three E195s. |
Cityjet have more crewing issues than anything else, plenty of Avro's sitting around. They've had to contract Jota across the summer extensively to cover the staffing void. In my experience Cityjet provide an excellent and reliable service.
|
Originally Posted by mik3bravo
(Post 10235595)
Whereas at Stobart Air, it's been a complete and utter disaster running those three E195s. |
Stobart must be thanking their lucky stars that the Cityjet deal fell through. The E195 serviceability may have given Stobart grief, but that was as nothing to the problems Cityjet faced with the SSJ100 on the Brussels Airlines contract. Plus two years on Cityjet have effectively pulled out of own b rand schedule flying.. What will Cityjet do with those SSJs when they come off the Brussels contract at the end of March ?
|
ive heard a lot of stobart first officers make the leap to aer lingus, is this true and does it happen often?
|
As posted on the Southend thread & from the Irish Independent...
Stobart Air pulling 2 EMB 190`s from SEN...services to Malpensa,Venice,Budapest & Prague to cease. 3rd `190 to continue SEN/DUB. |
|
Originally Posted by southside bobby
(Post 10235986)
As posted on the Southend thread & from the Irish Independent...
Stobart Air pulling 2 EMB 190`s from SEN...services to Malpensa,Venice,Budapest & Prague to cease. 3rd `190 to continue SEN/DUB. |
Originally Posted by mik3bravo
(Post 10236005)
Ah yes, but which of the three will remain to service the SEN - DUB goldmine route? One of the two G reg'd or the one EI reg'd aircraft. They need to select the aircraft with the best maintenance performance. Judging Stobart Air's fleet management performance to date, I remain doubtful they have the potential to deliver a reliable, punctual and consistent service on that route. I could be wrong, but experience to date speaks volumes.
|
There won't be any UK registered 195s with Stobart by that time. G-FBEF & 'H will return to Flybe once EI-GGA & 'B have been delivered over the next couple of months.
|
I am assuming SEN-DUB will continue until the end of the Winter season only. Surely continuing alongside Ryanair would amount to commercial suicide?
|
So just to to clear this up. Stobart will remain the ''proud' owners / custodians of three 195's, but only one of these is currently in operation with them?
|
Originally Posted by DC3 Dave
(Post 10236064)
So just to to clear this up. Stobart will remain the ''proud' owners / custodians of three 195's, but only one of these is currently in operation with them?
|
Originally Posted by DC3 Dave
(Post 10236064)
So just to to clear this up. Stobart will remain the ''proud' owners / custodians of three 195's, but only one of these is currently in operation with them?
With no extension on the Flybe / Stobart Air franchise partnership looking likely, it's going to be interesting to see how that fleet gets used. Short term ACMI and Ad-Hoc charter work may well better suit these E195s better than a "heavy" scheduled timetable. |
I would suggest the DUB route will cease and the single retained E195 would then be enough to cover the remaining routes to Cologne, Lyon and Rennes. Zadar would still be possible as well. Its the future of the ATRs I’m interested in. |
Originally Posted by AirportPlanner1
(Post 10236106)
Its the future of the ATRs I’m interested in. I would suggest there are three possibilities: 1) The Flybe/Stobart Air franchise is extended and the SEN ATR routes will continue to be operated as now. 2) The SEN ATR routes could operate under a different franchise banner. Possibly Aer Lingus Regional (maybe not very likely) or another UK carrier. 3) The SEN ATR routes may not operate at all after next Spring. |
Originally Posted by Expressflight
(Post 10236115)
I would suggest there are three possibilities:
1) The Flybe/Stobart Air franchise is extended and the SEN ATR routes will continue to be operated as now. 2) The SEN ATR routes could operate under a different franchise banner. Possibly Aer Lingus Regional (maybe not very likely) or another UK carrier. 3) The SEN ATR routes may not operate at all after next Spring. Im surprised that Stobart have decided to continue on the DUB-SEN route with the E195. Its going to be tough to compete with Ryanair on that one. It seems like Stobart find themselves in a similar position to CityJet - decent routes but the wrong brand/infrastructure to operate them with. |
I think the statement that one 195 will be retained at SEN to operate the DUB service relates only until the end of March 2019 when Ryanair commence operations at SEN. Part of the deal may be that Stobart will continue SEN-DUB until Ryanair take over, simply to maintain continuity of the route. I cannot see Stobart continuing to operate SEN-DUB after that time.
|
SEN-DUB is one route that might make sense as an Aer Lingus Regional route - plenty of UK regional routes to Dublin where RYR and EI/EIR compete
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:40. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.