|
Prestwick-2
Is the main cause of the loss due to the running costs of the terminal, or is it more deeply rooted than that.
Could PIK with assistance from the Scottish Govt look at a new terminal akin to what Inverness or even Southend have. Would be more fit for purpose and running costs should be reduced some what from the aging existing building. |
Originally Posted by goldeneye
(Post 9861570)
Is the main cause of the loss due to the running costs of the terminal, or is it more deeply rooted than that.
Could PIK with assistance from the Scottish Govt look at a new terminal akin to what Inverness or even Southend have. Would be more fit for purpose and running costs should be reduced some what from the aging existing building. All that just to build another loss making public funded airport with a few FR flights to med destinations would be ridiculous, IMO. |
Originally Posted by mwm991
(Post 9861604)
Southend's new terminal cost £10m, nevermind the additional demolition costs for the current PIK terminal.
All that just to build another loss making public funded airport with a few FR flights to med destinations would be ridiculous, IMO. |
Originally Posted by TRN1K
(Post 9861454)
So you would take maybe 3 Ryanair's a day, a freighter if lucky, no regular USAF?
What about the days around 2006/7, when PIK was supporting several daily 747s, North American 767s, high levels of USAF (granted, during 2 full scale wars in the Middle East), booming Ryanair, a brilliant charter programme? I hope to god there is life in the old dog yet, but as the days, weeks and years go on, I am sadly becoming less and less convinced. |
The airport just needs one big announcement at the terminal to get the place buzzing again and I imagine they will be working hard to achieve that goal and then some. Matthew Hudson was a commercially aware businessman who I believe sunk some of his own money into PIK / ACAP. He was realistic and pretty ruthless to save the airport from closure. This allowed the business to be sold to Stagecoach and later Infratil who between them, completely lost control of costs. Main deck cargo is going away, Air France are not replacing their last two B777Fs, Singapore are folding Cargo back into mainline as it shrinks, Polar and Atlas have gone. I wasn't suggesting replacing the terminal, I was suggesting building a slightly more fit for purpose GA facility on Apron G. Close the terminal and sell off the land. I hope to god there is life in the old dog yet, but as the days, weeks and years go on, I am sadly becoming less and less convinced. |
Originally Posted by beyond the boundary
(Post 9861691)
All the traffic under Hudson team was self generated. Yes the era you speak of was exceptional, but the majority of that fell in Prestwicks lap as you say due to the conflicts in the Middle East.
I hope to god there is life in the old dog yet, but as the days, weeks and years go on, I am sadly becoming less and less convinced. |
Originally Posted by Skipness One Echo
(Post 9861697)
Agreed, I was a passionate supporter for years then moved away and saw the big old world. Kinda heart breaking to see what's happenend but this can't go on.
However I do wonder if the taxpayers cash could be better spent on creating new jobs elsewhere. There is an inevitability here which means that every month they keep in operational as it is, that's less money available for investing in jobs elsewhere. |
Originally Posted by beyond the boundary
(Post 9858915)
As an avid supporter and former employee of Prestwick Airport(not Greer or Landmark I may add) it breaks my heart to see the state the airport finds itself in.
Forgetting the passenger side of things, Prestwick Handling was meant to be the saviour of the airport. Unfortunately Belfast, Glasgow and Edinburgh are all having other ideas. I cannot remember Glasgow or Edinburgh having so much military traffic as they do now. Traffic that once upon a time was Prestwick regulars. Belfast (Global Trek) are on a whole new level however. In the last 2 months they have scored upwards of 50 USAF C-130`s. This is not to mention US Navy C40`s and USAF C-40`s regularly going through the Irish airport. The majority of this traffic previously used Prestwick. Incredibly Prestwick have an exclusive military fuel contract that should have the US military flocking to the airport in there droves. However quite the opposite is happening. Cargo is also down and indeed the W/B CLX772 has been lost on the Monday night. There also seems to be no urgency to chase other types of traffic - ferry flights etc. Now spotters on here will try and say how busy the place is with C-17`s etc, but these are few and far between. The majority of days the ramps are empty. Handling are very poor and I've no doubt this is why a lot of traffic is leaving for other airports. Something is seriously wrong, new management seem to be worse than the last Infratil team, with the main gripe being that the current management are surrounding themselves with people who are ex-colleagues, and have very little knowledge of how things work. I`m sorry, but the airport I have supported and loved all my life is on it`s knees, and barring a miracle is finished. |
Originally Posted by Aftershock
(Post 9880926)
Just wondered if BTB would care to give us an update on the BFS v PIK military traffic since his last post? Seeing as BFS are "on a whole new level". Be good to see what PIK has to aspire to.
|
BTB probably wouldn't care to recognise the score, if keeping score, for the past week, is PIK about 20, BFS about 2.
|
What's the difference in profit and loss between PIK and BFS since we're keeping score?
2016 passenger volumes : PIK 600K BFS 4.3M The number of weekly C130s is perhaps not the smartest KPI..... |
Best maybe you changed your handle S1E, you are in the running for the most anti PIK person on PPRuNe, without a doubt, I reckon you are pretty out of touch as to why PIK is still in existence.
|
Enlighten me why PIK still exists in terms of what cannot be done sensibly elsewhere without raiding the schools and NHS budget to subsidise Michael O'Leary.
Do we really need a seperate airport for Cargolux and Air France Cargo? |
Originally Posted by Skipness One Echo
(Post 9881712)
Enlighten me why PIK still exists in terms of what cannot be done sensibly elsewhere without raiding the schools and NHS budget to subsidise Michael O'Leary.
Do we really need a seperate airport for Cargolux and Air France Cargo? They would probably also be unable to send a freighter direct to destinations like Los Angeles from Scotland. Exports that are trucked to England get claimed as UK exports and the resultant figures are used in political propaganda against the Scottish people. I'm sure that MOL is smart enough to use this situation to his advantage. |
might i remind you and everyone that belfast is not irish, there are plenty of atlases and maps out there if people want to look and see! |
Originally Posted by Groundloop
(Post 9881923)
Well, I have just looked at one and Belfast appears to me to be in Northern IRELAND!!! If you are saying Belfast is not "irish" then, by the same token, Prestwick is not "scottish".:ugh:
But back to airport talk. Honestly I think that Prestwick should be closed and redeveloped. Ryanair are on their way out of PIK anyway and will most likely move all services to GLA in the near future. |
Originally Posted by Rob Royston
(Post 9881917)
We shouldn't need a separate airport for heavy freighters, but it is a fact that the privatised city airports in Scotland cannot land these aircraft especially in the wet and are showing no sign of extending their runways.
|
Originally Posted by billyg
(Post 9882004)
GLA representatives have already been talking to Cargolux earlier this year with a view to moving their services once the work is complete in 2019 !
Prestwick has 8300ft on runway 30 and 7500ft on runway 12, which is itself a bit tight in some conditions. |
Landing distance is measured from the threshold not the aiming point and assumes aircraft crosses the threshold at 50 feet
|
Landing Distances Available from the AIP:
Glasgow 05: 2661m Glasgow 23: 2356m Prestwick 12: 2743m Prestwick 30: 2986m |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:01. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.