Since when is Luton full, I thought there were a number of slots available in mid morning early afternoon plus TUI are operating fewer flights next summer. Sorry to be pedantic but it is three weekly to Pula (early morning) and Verona twice weekly.
|
Since it hit 18 million passengers the airport would be in breach of its planning permission to go above it. In fact it needs to reduce flights as the trend is still increasing although the airport has its own criteria for ignoring some passenger types that are included in CAA figures.
|
Originally Posted by compton3bravo
(Post 10637343)
Since when is Luton full, I thought there were a number of slots available in mid morning early afternoon plus TUI are operating fewer flights next summer. Sorry to be pedantic but it is three weekly to Pula (early morning) and Verona twice weekly.
|
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 10637371)
Since it hit 18 million passengers the airport would be in breach of its planning permission to go above it. In fact it needs to reduce flights as the trend is still increasing although the airport has its own criteria for ignoring some passenger types that are included in CAA figures.
|
Subject to results tomorrow!?
|
Originally Posted by Buster the Bear
(Post 10637492)
All this development, were they in ignorance of the planning permission? Seems a lot of cash has been invested already into a sizable increase beyond the 18m! I assume that Poacher and Gamekeeper will strike a deal to grant permission, or is Central Govt now on the case?
When 19 million is reached the airport operator will put in another planning application for 20 million. This will carry on until 22.5 million is reached when the existing airport footprint can't take any more passengers which was meant to be the case with 18 million passengers. From the councils point of view the airport operator put in the application late which will have an impact on 2020 operations. This might have been down to who pays for what as the airport operator cuts back on funding new projects with the end of the franchise due in 2031. This all becomes irrelevant if the DCO to government is approved for 32 million but then it might not get approved. With the council spending £460 million funding pre expansion projects the council might be left in deep sh!t |
Never mind the towns Council tax payers can foot that bill should it occur.
|
Originally Posted by LTNman
(Post 10637597)
In the short term the airport operator, who does the councils dirt work, has put in 2 planning applications. The first one is to breach the agreed noise limits while a second planning application is to add a further million passengers. The council planning committee that will consider the applications will ignore all complaints as the council has its fingers in the airports tills and will approve the applications without considering any objections.
When 19 million is reached the airport operator will put in another planning application for 20 million. This will carry on until 22.5 million is reached when the existing airport footprint can't take any more passengers which was meant to be the case with 18 million passengers. From the councils point of view the airport operator put in the application late which will have an impact on 2020 operations. This might have been down to who pays for what as the airport operator cuts back on funding new projects with the end of the franchise due in 2031. This all becomes irrelevant if the DCO to government is approved for 32 million but then it might not get approved. With the council spending £460 million funding pre expansion projects the council might be left in deep sh!t |
As the 1960s title of a British comedy film 'Don't Panic Chaps' ways will be found to circumnavigate the 18 million cap. For instance we won't include all the private charter passengers anymore in the monthly passengers - only a small amount in the context of the passenger numbers - but it all helps. For instance Arsenal flying to/from Liege for a European cup tie and premier league teams flying to/from Manchester, Liverpool, Newcastle et Al. Where there is a well there is a way.
|
Originally Posted by Lee Baker Street
(Post 10637970)
LTNman Not everyone has objections to the growth of the airport! The airports most loyal customers are those from the St Albans area and the rest of Hertfordshire. |
Luton to Abu Dhabi next year?
|
As I went under the new Dart bridge today (twice) I realised why it seems incongrous to me. The'swoop' rises to meet the end of the runway but, as it appears to be designed to mimic the aircraft - it is wrong. If it were 180 degrees around, then the swoop would follow the trajectory of aircraft.
The overall height would be the same for avoidance but it would seem more correct. But then, it is only there to look 'pretty' and for PR images. |
It's the right way round as it symbolises a late missed approach due to the crowded airspace above Luton if the runway is blocked by a waiting departure.
Think Future Luton, think 32 million Luton. |
Planning application in.
Buildings 94/95 on Percival Way to be demolished (at last). Going to be re surfaced and used as staff parking. |
Construction update
Parkway interchange continues to receive its upper steelwork. In the background the Gateway Bridge can be seen. In the foreground two mysterious steel structures have appeared in recent weeks.
https://i.imgur.com/fsyQteY.jpg The embankment by taxiway Bravo has been removed. https://i.imgur.com/4E4ajgY.jpg The ring road is getting close to being rerouted away from taxiway Delta and will hug the second multi story. The right hand curve will link the service road. The former drop off zone is being used as a parking area for staff to park meet and greet cars https://i.imgur.com/QTObGxG.jpg Comparing the artists impression with what has been built so far it looks like the higher roof support will have concrete slabbing around it. Note the lip on the concrete retaining wall for some sort of roof just outside the station area. https://i.imgur.com/q1hwv2C.jpg https://i.imgur.com/cFI54SQ.jpg |
Thanks LTNman, Good update as usual. Wizz have not launched the Armenia flights yet, however it might not be too long as TUI have just sold/traded some slots with Wizz. https://en.armlink.am/wizz-air-to-ca...s-flights.html https://www.acl-uk.org/wp-content/up...TO-W9-SWAP.pdf |
Originally Posted by Boeing737-8
(Post 10641973)
Wizz have not launched the Armenia flights yet, however it might not be too long as TUI have just sold/traded some slots with Wizz. 17 slot pairs by all accounts. That sounds to me like a whole based unit? I’m not good with those charts, but I’ll assume that ‘was’ the second based unit and not the sole based unit planned? |
AS I said before but with no evidence apart from an insider at TUI HQ, he has told me they are planning to pull their LTN base. Seeing the base has been in decline for years it seems a likely outcome which will be painful for those staff members based at LTN.
|
My best guess for what it's worth is that Wizz have taken the slots of one of the two based TUI aircraft of summer 2019, which leaves just one based for summer 2020 plus a few flights on W pattern which gives Wizz to base another aircraft at the airport making 10.
|
The bulk of the TUI slots traded with Wizz are for peak school holiday period flights as operated last Summer with a based 737. The basic plan for Summer 2020 has been for a second aircraft to be based Mon-Thurs during most of the Summer season (Fri-Sun based elsewhere) No doubt TUI are still fine-tuning the program so it remains to be seen what actually happens and the MAX grounding may well be a factor here....
Do these slots actually have monetary value? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.