Southend-2
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes - but to all intents, the SEN operation seemed to be a largely independent operation running under the flyBe name so I would have thought it would be relatively simple to bolt on a Stobart front-end and carry on. I too was wondering if they had seen the forward bookings and thought "Naaah..."
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 43
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The same could have been done for IOM pax who have very limited options otherwise.
Edit: This seems exactly what Blue Islands are doing today.
Last edited by Expressflight; 5th Mar 2020 at 09:21. Reason: new info
Edit: This seems exactly what Blue Islands are doing today.
This is until they have their own booking engine up and running, which they say they hope to do by Monday, if not sooner.
They are also operating replacement flights from the islands to EXT and BHX today - not normal routes for them.
Good for them.
Also don't understand why the Stobart-operated former Flybe franchise flights could not carry on in a similar way?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am really puzzled by this. Stobart has a fully operational "back office" for the EI-branded flights, so unless the BE-branded lfights were operated in some sort of joint company and not just, as it appeared all the time, under a common brand, stopping operations at a time when almost the whole domestic market is up for grabs and others are quickly moving in to benefit from this, is a somewhat strange business move. Particularly as most routes had little to do with BE's core network and should easily survive on a stand-alone basis.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am really puzzled by this. Stobart has a fully operational "back office" for the EI-branded flights, so unless the BE-branded lfights were operated in some sort of joint company and not just, as it appeared all the time, under a common brand, stopping operations at a time when almost the whole domestic market is up for grabs and others are quickly moving in to benefit from this, is a somewhat strange business move. Particularly as most routes had little to do with BE's core network and should easily survive on a stand-alone basis.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: thelandofnod
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
asdf1234...you are only 90% incorrect. The Embraer's and IOM operation was ACMI. All other flying was/is franchise at Stobart Air commercial risk. Stobart would have received forward sales revenue from Flybe for SEN operation.
Regarding the reasons for Stobart not trying to put together an ongoing operation on the lines of the Blue Islands model, I could be cynical and say 'well it is Stobart we're talking about', but I think it likely they can't now see any great financial benefit in doing so with the Covid-19 situation being what it is.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, that's just not true. For the Stobart SEN routes for example, Stobart took the commercial risk from the start with Flybe providing the back office and reservations system for a fee. Marketing was split between the two companies' teams but I don't know how the costs were allocated for that. I doubt you were involved in the setting up of that operation but I was.
Regarding the reasons for Stobart not trying to put together an ongoing operation on the lines of the Blue Islands model, I could be cynical and say 'well it is Stobart we're talking about', but I think it likely they can't now see any great financial benefit in doing so with the Covid-19 situation being what it is.
Regarding the reasons for Stobart not trying to put together an ongoing operation on the lines of the Blue Islands model, I could be cynical and say 'well it is Stobart we're talking about', but I think it likely they can't now see any great financial benefit in doing so with the Covid-19 situation being what it is.
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed, BI are offering to fly people with a Flybe reservation for free today, or if no reservation for a £50 all-in walk-up fare at the airport.
This is until they have their own booking engine up and running, which they say they hope to do by Monday, if not sooner.
They are also operating replacement flights from the islands to EXT and BHX today - not normal routes for them.
Good for them.
Also don't understand why the Stobart-operated former Flybe franchise flights could not carry on in a similar way?
This is until they have their own booking engine up and running, which they say they hope to do by Monday, if not sooner.
They are also operating replacement flights from the islands to EXT and BHX today - not normal routes for them.
Good for them.
Also don't understand why the Stobart-operated former Flybe franchise flights could not carry on in a similar way?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not at all. It hasn't stopped me flying but I understand why others might not want to. However I see this as an easy excuse being used by the owners as to why they won't save their airline. Look back to SARS, swine fever, bird flu etc..., all come and go and the airlines keep flying.
I think the truth about Stobart Air and the FlyBe routes was that whilst the airport owned the airline, they used it to inflate the airport pax numbers and route network. Now the airline is owned by a consortium, they are happy to dump the SEN routes as they are deeply unprofitable.
I think the truth about Stobart Air and the FlyBe routes was that whilst the airport owned the airline, they used it to inflate the airport pax numbers and route network. Now the airline is owned by a consortium, they are happy to dump the SEN routes as they are deeply unprofitable.
Originally Posted by Wycombe View Post
Indeed, BI are offering to fly people with a Flybe reservation for free today, or if no reservation for a £50 all-in walk-up fare at the airport.
This is until they have their own booking engine up and running, which they say they hope to do by Monday, if not sooner.
They are also operating replacement flights from the islands to EXT and BHX today - not normal routes for them.
Good for them.
Also don't understand why the Stobart-operated former Flybe franchise flights could not carry on in a similar way?
If you were a customer not knowing nor caring about franchise arrangements, how would you feel about paying again to board a Flybe branded aircraft?
Indeed, BI are offering to fly people with a Flybe reservation for free today, or if no reservation for a £50 all-in walk-up fare at the airport.
This is until they have their own booking engine up and running, which they say they hope to do by Monday, if not sooner.
They are also operating replacement flights from the islands to EXT and BHX today - not normal routes for them.
Good for them.
Also don't understand why the Stobart-operated former Flybe franchise flights could not carry on in a similar way?
If you were a customer not knowing nor caring about franchise arrangements, how would you feel about paying again to board a Flybe branded aircraft?
At this time of year, in my recent experience, it's mainly island residents, their visitors, or people travelling for business that are using these flights, so I would say most are well aware of the situation.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Under insolvency law, airlines continuing to operate that use the Flybe brand will quickly remove anything "Flybe" from the aircraft etc. That's what Condor did when Thomas Cook went under.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Planet no. 3
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of all the major UK & Irish airlines surely Flybe would have one of the least affected.
A couple of weeks ago a friend (with no great interest in aviation) who travels to Glasgow half a dozen times a year was having a moan about the loss of the Loganair SEN-GLA route. I pointed out that he could book with Flybe from May.
He said he wasn’t prepared to because of the uncertainty and all the associated hassle getting his money back if the flights did not happen. I did point out it was possible to book the flights through Virgin Atlantic, but he said he felt more confident flying from STN even if getting there was a lot less convenient.
A couple of weeks ago a friend (with no great interest in aviation) who travels to Glasgow half a dozen times a year was having a moan about the loss of the Loganair SEN-GLA route. I pointed out that he could book with Flybe from May.
He said he wasn’t prepared to because of the uncertainty and all the associated hassle getting his money back if the flights did not happen. I did point out it was possible to book the flights through Virgin Atlantic, but he said he felt more confident flying from STN even if getting there was a lot less convenient.
Of all the major UK & Irish airlines surely Flybe would have one of the least affected.
Felt sad that in my small way I was contributing to yesterdays outcome.
I think the truth about Stobart Air and the FlyBe routes was that whilst the airport owned the airline, they used it to inflate the airport pax numbers and route network. Now the airline is owned by a consortium, they are happy to dump the SEN routes as they are deeply unprofitable.