Stansted closed by protesters.
Yes, but they shouldn't be disrupted unnecessarily by people acting illegally. I'm surprised you don't seem to understand that. Neither have you answered the point made by several posters as to why the protest couldn't have been made without breaking the law
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STANSTED & MANCHESTER
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is getting shot with in or outside the law of a potential terrorist incident
According to your thoughts it wouldn't matter because sometimes it's necessary to break the law to to get results
Hence break into a restricted area be prepared to be shot simple
I can assure you I AM NOT an anarchist, far from it. I believe in up holding the law and have managed to do over 71 years apart from some traffic infringements. However there are circumstances when breaking the law can be justifiable, I have for instanced the suffragette movement and the civil rights movement in the US.
daz211. I am not very keen on shooting people in any circumstances. "Hence break into a restricted area be prepared to be shot simple" Oh yes, suppose someone ends up in that area by mistake, without breaking in. An innocent person could end up dead in your scenario. Can't say it has happened at an airport but it has certainly happened elsewhere and in other similar circumstances.
Why mention terrorism? It has nothing to do with what I was talking about.........
daz211. I am not very keen on shooting people in any circumstances. "Hence break into a restricted area be prepared to be shot simple" Oh yes, suppose someone ends up in that area by mistake, without breaking in. An innocent person could end up dead in your scenario. Can't say it has happened at an airport but it has certainly happened elsewhere and in other similar circumstances.
Why mention terrorism? It has nothing to do with what I was talking about.........
Last edited by Planemike; 29th Mar 2017 at 18:38.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STANSTED & MANCHESTER
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
daz211. I am not very keen on shooting people in any circumstances. "Hence break into a restricted area be prepared to be shot simple" Oh yes, suppose someone ends up in that area by mistake, without breaking in. An innocent person could end up dead in your scenario. Can't say it has happened at an airport but it has certainly happened elsewhere and in other similar circumstances.
Why mention terrorism? It has nothing to do with what I was talking about.........[/QUOTE]
What do you mean it had nothing to do with terrorism it could easily have been we only know after the even it was protesters.
Protesters need to know they have the right to peaceful protest with in the law they also need to know that the first thoughts and response to unlawful access to a major airport will be considered as terror related and I am happy for that to be the case.
Who in the right mind wound think lets break into an airport and not at the same time think no hold on we might cause a major terror alert
I'm sticking to my opinion shoot em all.
Why mention terrorism? It has nothing to do with what I was talking about.........[/QUOTE]
What do you mean it had nothing to do with terrorism it could easily have been we only know after the even it was protesters.
Protesters need to know they have the right to peaceful protest with in the law they also need to know that the first thoughts and response to unlawful access to a major airport will be considered as terror related and I am happy for that to be the case.
Who in the right mind wound think lets break into an airport and not at the same time think no hold on we might cause a major terror alert
I'm sticking to my opinion shoot em all.
I'm sticking to my opinion shoot em all.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STANSTED & MANCHESTER
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You brought up the subject of terrorists, I was talking about protesters. I take you back the fact the folk at Stansted were protesters.
What a truly ridiculous suggestion. If it is said in jest, it is in poor taste. One can only hope that you or one of yours are not the innocent person shot if such a callous policy were adopted. Think about what you have said before you press the 'send' button
Last edited by Planemike; 30th Mar 2017 at 13:18.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STANSTED & MANCHESTER
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let's just agree to disagree I live in the modern world perhaps you know a different world to the one we are now in.
daz211............
The ridiculous suggestion did not come from you but from mikkie4. Just wanted him to think about what he had written.
Back to your point about "a different world", not so, there is only one world and we both inhabit it: together with about 7 billion others.
The ridiculous suggestion did not come from you but from mikkie4. Just wanted him to think about what he had written.
Back to your point about "a different world", not so, there is only one world and we both inhabit it: together with about 7 billion others.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cheshire
Age: 45
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought airport police were armed? if so then why were these complete and utter morons not shot on sight????
As has been said they should all be made to pay back all costs. If you cant afford to pay for your actions then don't commit the crime.
As has been said they should all be made to pay back all costs. If you cant afford to pay for your actions then don't commit the crime.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cheshire
Age: 45
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shooting innocent people is not acceptable, you are correct but the people concerned are not innocent in anyway, they have clearly broken the law and show nothing but contempt for the legal system. Please think about what you are writing before you click post.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Between the flower pots
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It wasn't even a good cause that the law was broken. Here we have a bunch of weird people that didn't like the idea of failed asylum seekers from Nigeria and Ghana being deported.
Their view seems to be that everyone that makes it here for a touch of the good life should be allowed to stay.
Their view seems to be that everyone that makes it here for a touch of the good life should be allowed to stay.
Yes, they broke the law, that was their decision. Anyone who protests takes that into account. A protest of this type does not justify being shot, as some writers seem to think is acceptable. A fine, probation or other similar sanction would seem much more reasonable. Yes, did think before pressing the "send" button!!