Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Kuwait Airlines pulls New York-London

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Kuwait Airlines pulls New York-London

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Dec 2015, 12:33
  #1 (permalink)  
doo
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kuwait Airlines pulls New York-London

Kuwait Airways scraps New York-London flights rather than allow Israelis - Israel News, Ynetnews
doo is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2015, 12:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With all the options available between JFK and LHR, it would seem that this gentleman had a political reason to try to book with Kuwait rather than a desire to fly with them and the Americans have fallen for it.
philbky is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2015, 13:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is a no brainer, obvious who America will support


Ian
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2015, 14:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dublin
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
AFAIK, Kuwait doesn't recognise the State of Israel. As the airline is owned by the Kuwaiti State, it would be unlikely their booking engine would accept the passport details.

JAS
Just a spotter is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2015, 16:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kot Addu
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This route wil continue operating but not pick passengers, it had been on since 1970s, no one bothered about it all this time, till this guy took it to court. All started post 9/11 the first incident was in 2002, second one in 2013.
newscaster is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2015, 19:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by newscaster
This route wil continue operating but not pick passengers
What would be the point of that?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2015, 20:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NI
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The route via Heathrow operates on days that the direct route to New York doesn't, thereby giving them both a Heathrow connection and a New York tag-on.

To replace it they'd need to roster two separate flights for Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays which would presumably be quite disruptive at short notice. Easier just to take a ( slight ) revenue hit by dropping the fifth-freedom bookings.

Perhaps for Summer 2016 they'll rejig the flights accordingly.
El Bunto is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2015, 03:05
  #8 (permalink)  
SRM
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to love doing this sequence in the 747-200.
SRM is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2015, 03:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given the way the US attempts to override the laws of other countries, this bit amused me:

"We do not find the interest of Kuwait in the enforcement of its laws in this case to be greater than the interest of the United States in the enforcement of its laws," the letter said. "It is our view that the US interest in providing nondiscriminatory access to air transportation to an individual traveling from the US to a third country that allows that individual's entry is greater than Kuwait's interest in applying its economic boycott of Israel."
At least they're enforcing their own law in their own country this time.
llondel is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2015, 06:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,088
Received 293 Likes on 164 Posts
Originally Posted by llondel
Given the way the US attempts to override the laws of other countries, this bit amused me:



At least they're enforcing their own law in their own country this time.
Well, the US government wouldn't want to annoy a particularly vocal monority of their population, that votes would they?
ATNotts is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2015, 16:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here's how the story plays to the fans in New York:

Jew-hating airline cancels flight rather than allow Israeli passengers

By Danielle Furfaro

December 17, 2015 | 1:14pm

Kuwait hates Jews so much that its national airline has ditched a popular and lucrative New York-to-London flight rather than allow Israelis on its planes, authorities said Thursday.

Kuwait Airways killed the flight to spite American officials, who threatened to pull the airline’s permit to fly to the United States if they continued discriminating against Israeli passengers.
Jew-hating airline cancels flight rather than allow Israeli passengers | New York Post
Airbubba is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2015, 19:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good riddance to bad rubbish. Not sure why we bothered liberating a country like that, though.
01475 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2015, 01:10
  #13 (permalink)  

SkyGod
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Palm Coast, Florida, USA
Age: 67
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 1 Post
Yup, I use to love that sequence on the 747-200.
2 days night stop in London, 3 days in New York, 2 days
In London on the way back, then return to the sandbox.
Per-diem paid in cash at the hotel, nice joints downtown.
TowerDog is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2015, 19:11
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kuwait Airlines pulls New York-London

AI pulled this route a few years back. It also had full 5th freedom rights and the route was once/day. Could it be that both carriers are no longer able to compute against BA-AA and VS-DL on LHR-JFK?

AI had an excellent reputation back in the day whenthe route was started as an extension of its BOM-LHR route. It has seen a shocking decline in reputation and standards in recent years, certainly enough to delay its admission to the Star Alliance. KU has always been "dry", so fares would have to be dirt cheap. Both carriers also now operate direct services.

Could the recent incidents have hastened a decision that was imminent anyway?
Fairdealfrank is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2015, 21:26
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The law in Kuwait makes it illegal for citizens (and businesses) to trade with Israel.

Based on that, it seems that the airline would have had no choice in the matter – they couldn't legally comply with the US demand, and therefore had no choice to pull the flight.
Noxegon is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2015, 15:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Much better article here:


It's Easy To Blame Kuwait Airways For Discrimination Against Israelis -- But It's Wrong

Forbes Welcome
Noxegon is offline  
Old 25th Dec 2015, 23:40
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brighton
Posts: 86
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't see this mentioned on the thread but this person has dual American Israeli nationality. I doubt he is stupid and knew very well that Kuwait does not recognise Israel. Why did he insist on using his Israeli passport and not his American one??? There is more to this than what the biased mainstream media is telling us. Seems like he had an ulterior motive from the start.... Whatever that motive would be...
787Heaven is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2015, 08:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't have any issue with his motive, honestly. If I was part of a group that was being discriminated at I would challenge it too.

However, I do take issue with the people blaming the airline for what has happened; it's not the airline's fault.
Noxegon is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2015, 09:23
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NI
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The passenger had originally booked with Air India but later discovered that the New York to Heathrow segment was code-shared and actually operated by Kuwait Airways ( this had been in place since 2009, AIC6336 operated by KAC102 ), which wasn't caught at the time of booking. Hence he was ineligible to board.

Kuwait Airways can still operate New York to Kuwait direct because the entry conditions in the destination country over-ride ticketing regs. However that was not the case between NY and London, since an Israeli passport is acceptable in both those countries.
El Bunto is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.