Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

DURHAM TEES VALLEY AIRPORT - 6

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

DURHAM TEES VALLEY AIRPORT - 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jan 2015, 15:52
  #461 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,550
Received 87 Likes on 59 Posts
I've obviously not made myself clear, so I’ll explain again.

My problem is not with increasing activity at DTVA and have said a number of times that the airport needs to diversify and attract other, preferably aviation related business - think Kemble, Staverton, Hurn, Norwich.

I also agree that anybody who buys a house near an airport deserves everything they get.

However that isn’t the case here – we’re not talking about existing householders, but about selling houses that haven’t yet been built.

Here’s how it might pan out

House Buyer: “what’s that noise?”

Estate Agent: “that’s just the parachute dropping/microlight training aircraft”

House Buyer: “Oh, and how often do they fly?”

Estate Agent: “Only on nice day’s at the weekend and the odd summer evening”

House Buyer: “So just when I want to be outside in my nice new garden?”

Now, will their response be option 1, “Oh good, where’s my Binoculars?” or Option 2 – “Thank you, but where’s next on my list?”


Again, and keeping it simple, a large part of the Peel Masterplan rests on selling land near the terminal for housing, and using the profit from that to fund the other areas of the plan.

Another part of the plan is diversifying the aviation activities at the airport and this they’ve done with the Parachuting and now the microlights – as others have said, that these can hardly be major money makers, can't have cost a lot to bring in and might well have an impact on the sale of the land which then impacts on the rest of the plan. Just looks a bit odd.

You can be sure developers will be using it to knock down the price Peel get, as they'll be saying it might put off future house buyers
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2015, 00:32
  #462 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nowhere I'll be found
Age: 41
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Tee
Let me try and explain. I haven,t quite reached the 74 years living next to the airport which you deem necessary to be able to be form an opinion regarding what I and many others find to be an annoying intrusion to our quality of life. I "have" lived next to the airport for well over fifty years and in all that time the only other reason we have had cause to complain was when the Police operated the "Islander" with it's very noisy piston engines. Lots of us where regularly woken in the dead of night by that aircraft droning around at low level, flaps deployed and high power settings. Thankfully that is a thing of the past. The "normal" airport movements of departures, arrivals and circuit training of all types from club light aircraft to passenger jet transports are not a problem as their noise "footprint" and duration is generally quite short.
I'm sorry an airport is there to serve aircraft of all shapes and sizes, noisy or quiet it doesn't matter, like I said, unless people have lived there for over 74 years the airport was there first and therefore has 'right of way', surely when you bought the house you did so knowing that noise would be a factor? I'm sorry but as far as I can see local residents of any airport do not and should not have a leg to stand on.

The Para Drop aircraft operation can in no way be described as normal for an operational "Airport" and is more suited to a rural flying club. The aircraft used is noted as being particularly noisy and the practice of climbing to "drop height" in the overhead before a rapid descent, re-load and repeat the process is intrusive and annoying.
Wrong, there's nothing that states an International or Regional airport cannot branch out into all forms of aviation, I even recall there's a Heathrow-sized airport somewhere in the world that has such traffic, albeit with a separate mini-runway in a very remote corner.

Originally Posted by Highwideandugly
It seems to me that Peel are trying very hard to give the impression that they actually care about the airport...without actually doing much at all and certainly not putting their hand in their pocket!

New Ga policy
Para school
Microlight training
A master plan


Not much input Methinks and certainly not much income.
The new GA policy is working, if they didn't care about the airport why release a master plan at all? And don't say to make it look like they care because a company like Peel do not give a monkeys about appearances, others have said it before if they wanted the place shut they would have years ago.

If you're going to criticise, take a leaf out of SWBKCBs book - he tries to see both sides instead of attacking the airport at every opportunity.

This is a harsh attitude to take, but by the time any house hunter looks at buying a new house near the terminal, the money from the housing land will already be in the airports coffers, therefore the airport do not need to care and can focus on the rest of the master plan.

The likes of Skydiving and Microlights may not bring in very much money, but the more companies that start-up/move in it will soon build up, and if they keep attracting companies at the rate they have been, it won't be long before they've got a good bit of rent pouring in.

Originally Posted by Beafer
As its been said before
Yeah - mostly by you
Originally Posted by Beafer
The 250 acres which Peel got for nothing
One acre for every time you've mentioned it, your repetitiveness certainly gives several on here a head-acre
No-More-Bullschit is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2015, 10:34
  #463 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 35
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said No-More-Bullschit!

Someone mentioned Gloucester, they're where they are today largely thanks to building a housing estate!
Cautious Optimist is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2015, 10:56
  #464 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,550
Received 87 Likes on 59 Posts
Housing estate at Staverton? Do you mean industrial estate?
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2015, 10:37
  #465 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Age: 73
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The CAA list of UK airports who charge fee's for passing through.

Only Peel could charge for a 3 year old to pass through the airport.

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/2200/Airport_Charges.pdf
Beafer is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2015, 11:08
  #466 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beafer, on the bright side, 2 bags for £1 at MME, 1 bag for £1 at NCL
GrahamK is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2015, 21:53
  #467 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
There is the same comment on the Eastern thread, is there such a thing as a forum bug?

Last edited by N707ZS; 10th Feb 2015 at 19:15.
N707ZS is online now  
Old 10th Feb 2015, 19:04
  #468 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,550
Received 87 Likes on 59 Posts
The link between Beefer's posts and DTVA become ever more tenuous...
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 10th Feb 2015, 19:16
  #469 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Think he needs to get out with the dogs a bit more!
N707ZS is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2015, 13:26
  #470 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Note to managment

If the people of Coventry don't want this it should fit nicely on our Southside.

Plan for 10,000 new jobs in Coventry BLOCKED by government - Coventry Telegraph
N707ZS is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2015, 14:35
  #471 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: England, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see the road down by Skydive St George and DTFT has been resurfaced, I wonder if this is related to the new south-side road as doesn't this section form part of it?
Robert-Ryan is online now  
Old 16th Feb 2015, 14:07
  #472 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down Latest figures

I know we have "agreed". Not to put too much emphasis on passenger figures as the new Master Plan comes to fruition(sic)...however January's figures are truly appalling....down another 10% on already rock bottom statistics.

Ok guys waiting for the chink of light.
highwideandugly is online now  
Old 16th Feb 2015, 14:13
  #473 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation another fact

I am nearly speechless but ..that equates to 159. Yes. 159 departing passengers per day using the airport.

We all live in hope but dear me !!!!!!
highwideandugly is online now  
Old 16th Feb 2015, 15:46
  #474 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Aberdeen down 14%
Amsterdam down 5%
NorthSouth is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 18:29
  #475 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Teesside
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Figures

Whilst I am sure the weather had an impact in January v last year, more worryingly we shouldn't underestimate the effect the collapse in oil price will have on these routes. Aberdeen is all about O and G and is suffering quite badly now with contractors losing their jobs and companies reducing their spend. KLM is a little more diverse but still relies on oil workers travelling out to projects around the world. Be interesting to see how these figures play out over the coming months........
P330 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2015, 19:42
  #476 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newcastle was also down 14% on the Aberdeen route but Amsterdam was up 2% - MME did suffer with at least one non weather cancellation by KLM (which I was booked on) plus I am not sure if the weather was a casualty.

Flew from this airport on Friday and what a good experience it is turning up at 5:15 in the morning with plenty of time to catch a 6am flight. Sure the facilities are not at the standard of larger airports but a short check in time is more important for me than a duty free shop or bar. The airport should make much more of this advantage in their marketing as LCY do.
tigertanaka is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2015, 16:06
  #477 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Middlesbrough U.K.
Age: 86
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can you believe anything that any M.P says, especially Labour?

Last edited by Lancelot37; 19th Feb 2015 at 16:06. Reason: Spelling
Lancelot37 is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2015, 16:33
  #478 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Doncaster
Age: 63
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do you want him to do? Say 'We'll let Newcastle represent us on the Transport for the North board, and I don't give a toss about the airport.'
johnnychips is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2015, 16:34
  #479 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Newcastle
Age: 48
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More Bad News

It just gets worse for DTV
Tees Valley Helicopter base to close | Tyne Tees - ITV News
Grahamy is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2015, 17:05
  #480 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: La Napoule
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best outcome for DTV would be sustainable development for the future:

Aeropark...tick...flying training... tick... limited housing (associated with aeropark perhaps)...tick...new technology and associated employment...tick....specialist industries...tick. Housing estates...cross....storage depot....cross.....retail park....cross...car manufacturing plant....probably cross (got one of those at former very nice a/f up the road)


Tees side flying club started my flying career over 35 years ago.

But the fact is that even then the local authorities were squabbling over who owned and was responsible for what. It was 'dead in the water' then and with ICI, BMA history, electrification of East Coast rail...it still is now. The region cannot support two international airports.


Time to stop dreaming,accept it and move forward.

Tin hat on...

Binder
Binder is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.