Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Airlines told: 'cut their loads by half'

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Airlines told: 'cut their loads by half'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Nov 2011, 03:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 52
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really like these kind of actions .
When in dire economic times, best thing to do is to bite the hand that feeds you
by striking thereby making the problem even worse.

Aking to railroad workers over here (all government workers btw) that go on strike whenever they want often unannounced and always at the busiest times.
I once asked them "why not work instead and not charge any fees for the travelling passengers, that'll really cost money for the employer, create sympathy from the public and doesn't inconveniance non affected parties ?, the logic of that question just was to hard to understand for those jokels.

Same could be done by the immigration officers @LHR, why not do your work
as usual, pick out those with immigration paper issues, process them as normal, for those that get cleared after being checked out or only have minor issues like lost passports that can be replaced etc... let them continue their journey.

For the ones that have real immigration issues, stop processing them, don't send them back to their countries ,don't fine the airlines as usual ,stop further processing and after a shortwhile police will have to intervene and find alternate housing for them
putting extra pressure on the government to solve the problem without inconveniancing the public and airlines too much.
kbrockman is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 06:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kbrockman: 'I really like these kind of actions .
When in dire economic times, best thing to do is to bite the hand that feeds you
by striking thereby making the problem even worse.'


You could look at it the other way: the UK government is biting the hands that keep the country running, thats why those hands are going on strike.

Having said that, I believe the unions should wait until negotiations have run their course, and then , if necessary, call a strike. But I can understand the anger of public sector workers. Anyway, enough politics for one day...

jensdad is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 10:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Airlines told: 'cut their loads by half'

BBC News - Public sector strike could see Heathrow 'grind to halt'
Passengers at Heathrow airport could face 12-hour delays next week when immigration officers go on strike over pensions, airlines have been warned.
The airport's chief operating officer Norman Boivin wrote to them to say there was a real danger of "gridlock".
To relieve the pressure, he has asked carriers to cut their "load factors" by half on international flights arriving into Heathrow.
Can we presume that Mr Boivin will meet the airlines losses?
Basil is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 11:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,503
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Can we presume that Mr Boivin will meet the airlines losses?
At least the passengers will be more comfortable - until they arrive at Heathrow.

Make Unions cough up
brakedwell is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 13:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dubai
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basil am I missing something. why would the BAA reimburse the airlines ??? It was a mere suggestion to help the situation next week.

This is a UKBA strike and therefore it is the Govt that should pay up if anyone does.

Thats like saying an aircaft manufacturer and not the airline should pay compensation to the passenger because an aircraft goes tech for a considerable time ?
southern duel is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 14:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Too far from the equator
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For gods sake , just declare heavy snowfall and shut London airports down for a day . Works every time. I just love giving advice to 3rd world countries , especially as I live in one near the equator !
kotakota is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 14:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Age: 66
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe someone should sue the unions if they are delayed or inconvienced.
xtypeman is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 16:00
  #8 (permalink)  
c52
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,262
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC says the strike threatens Heathrow chaos.

Anything that threatens the state of chaos at Heathrow must be a good thing, surely?
c52 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 16:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Can they bring back the Borders Agency guy as he let the Pax in without any checks.
racedo is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 21:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thankfully we live in a democracy and those Civil Servants feel that they have a genuine argument and have no course of action but to go on strike. Peaceful protest is perfectly acceptable if your not happy living in a free democratic country then I suggest a move to China or Iran may be appropriate.

Yes it will cause people problems and indeed I will be inconvenienced myself as my childrens school will be closed and even if I was to go to work all the citys Metro drivers are on strike also. So I will have to take a days unpaid holiday but that I believe is a small price to pay in order to live in a democracy.
ncleflights is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2011, 21:31
  #11 (permalink)  
FR-
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: MIA-IBZ
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And will LHR be expecting full landing fees? Plus will the airline even break even with a plane only half full?

fr-
FR- is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2011, 04:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst it may be only a month since I emigrated from UK this thread just serves to remind me of what a good decision I made.

As an expat Aussie jested with me only last week ... about the only worry we have on this island is ... "Are you sure your beer is cold enough mate".
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2011, 08:48
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, those public sector workers should be aware that we can't pay their agreed pensions AND pay for this:
BBC News - Asylum seeking benefits cheat received nearly £400,000
His mum and dad need their pensions, you know!
Basil is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2011, 09:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nirvana
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UI'm sure most carriers will continue to land with their booked pax load - up BAA to sort it out - after all, they're due one back from the airlines, me thinks!
Cyber Bob is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2011, 10:04
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,080
Received 286 Likes on 160 Posts
With a lot of nationalities less good / patient at queuing as we Brits I can imagine, if things get as bad as BAA are hyping them to be, then it's more than likely that tempers will fray, and eventually impatient travellers will "gate crash" the border agency desks; added to which there will be disorder on flights where passengers are held on board. Will the police and security staff be able to cope with such disorder? I doubt it.

Frankly I wouldn't blame passengers is they did gate crash their way in.

Surely to prevent this happening the Border Agency should allow free flow of EU arriving passengers through the border (a la Schengen) for the day, and use what resources they have to offer a decent level of checks to non EU flights.

Simples! But I doubt that Theresa May nor her friends at the Torygraph, Mail and Sun would countenence such a sensible move.

As for the strikers, I suggest they join the rest of us in the real world, pensionswise!
ATNotts is online now  
Old 26th Nov 2011, 10:27
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it not a wholly conceivable idea that the major capitals with UK embassies and High Commissions can not use staff to pre screen pax!!! where is the BCP?
gazcork is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2011, 10:32
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As for the strikers, I suggest they join the rest of us in the real world, pensionswise! - why should there be this race to the bottom in this country.

I have worked in the airline industry since 1986 and my wife has been in the public sector since 1988. My pension is no where near as good as hers will be when I retire but that needs to be balanced against a pay that has continually been behind that of the public sector. Now only a few years to retirement she is told she will loose thousands of pounds and have to contribute more to receive less (a pay cut in real terms). I do not know of many people in the public or private sector that would stand by and allow such a radical change to their terms and conditions. Remember this crises was not caused by your public sector refuse collectors, town hall cleaners, grave diggers, home helps etc, some of the poorest paid in society but by a greedy and unregulated banking sector and yet we expect them to pay by radically cutting their pay. Please lets stick to the facts and not behave the media hype about how well paid the public sector is.
ncleflights is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2011, 11:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cut the loads by half

So what do we do ...... every flight we send into LHR we are expected to deny boarding to half the booked passengers i.e. cut the loads by half ?? Hilarious.
sealink is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2011, 10:42
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,656
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by ncleflights
Remember this crises was .... caused by ... a greedy and unregulated banking sector
I know the banks have been blamed for all sorts of bizarre things in recent times, but to stick them for the fact that people are progressively living longer and thus taking significantly larger pensions from the pot, really takes the biscuit.

The state of public pensions had become grossly unaffordable in this area, and politicians were progressively living in "Emperor has no clothes" land about it, long before there was any mention of any issues in some (only) of the banking sector.
WHBM is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2011, 11:52
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cut your loads by half, or risk having aircraft grounded with pax still on board who are unable to disembark from a previous arrival?

It's gonna kick off big time.

Presuming they'll be a lot of dubious types aiming to enter the UK on Wednesday now.

What a kerfuffle.
AircraftOperations is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.