Aer Lingus - 6
Is the second UA EWR definitely staying next year anyway?
So with EI in bed with both UA and AA now, ET and DL are the only airlines serving the US outside it, 17 flights a week....not a lot!
Just curious about something. BA are replacing 767s with 787s at the moment aren't they? I wonder if a couple of them could fly for EI until the A350s start to arrive? The 767 is the same type rating as the 757 isn't it? I know the 757 crews are Air Contractors, but many of them are on secondment from EI anyway
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Antrim
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wasn't the day flight for a period of 12 weeks over summer while an omni air 767 went into SNN? The day JFK was a 757, EWR will be A330. BDL will be 757 however, wondering if that means YYZ will be taken off for winter 16?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: BDL
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Happy about BDL route over here
Bradley To Dublin Aer Lingus Flights Expected To Start September 2016 - Hartford Courant
This is great for those of us who fly out of southern New England. We haven't had a direct to Europe since 2009 or so.
This is great for those of us who fly out of southern New England. We haven't had a direct to Europe since 2009 or so.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Believe no cuts are been made for LAX so another leased Airbus is arriving. Best chance is one Airbus will arrive on time for EWR launch and the second arrival will enter service in 2017 as whatever way you look at it they need to lease another Airbus for 2017 so leasing it for LAX saves the same expense in 2017.
17% capacity increase cannot be achieved by waiting for Airbus to arrive.
17% capacity increase cannot be achieved by waiting for Airbus to arrive.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fourth 752 will be used on IAD to operate a daily service (4 weekly now) between May-September before moving to Heartford. IAD A332 will move to LAX, while a weekly MCO will not operate and also move to LAX.
Would appear extra JFK will not run next year nor the increased capacity at SNN.
Would appear extra JFK will not run next year nor the increased capacity at SNN.
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: dublin
Age: 64
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EI why did IAG buy it
So EI have a unique offering,
EI/KL so close they are nearly married
EI B6 very profitable both parties dead happy
EI /BA getting even closer
EI UA as above
Add in AC AA
First casualty , EY will go for sure IAG don't need them?
Interesting times ahead but EI are quite unique in their reach for such a small carrier
EI/KL so close they are nearly married
EI B6 very profitable both parties dead happy
EI /BA getting even closer
EI UA as above
Add in AC AA
First casualty , EY will go for sure IAG don't need them?
Interesting times ahead but EI are quite unique in their reach for such a small carrier
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First casualty , EY will go for sure IAG don't need them?
The UA scenario is an interesting one and the recent announcements such as EWR and possibly using T7 at LAX. Surly UA will need to get the boot when they rejoin OW, can OW refuse EI entry if they don't get rid of them?
Personally I am not a fan of AA and would hub in the US with JetBlue or United only or fly directly from LHR or any Euro hub. I would hate for EI to force passengers onto AA.