Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Crunch time for BAA airport disposal?

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Crunch time for BAA airport disposal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Mar 2011, 15:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Livingston and Edinburgh
Age: 86
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crunch time for BAA airport disposal?

Looks like they will be finally instructed this week.

UK watchdog to force airport sale -report | Reuters
Joe Curry is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 15:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Age: 36
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope they Sell Glasgow
kazzie is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 18:00
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Livingston and Edinburgh
Age: 86
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IMHO either selling either EDI or GLA would allow greater competition in Scotland.
Selling STN would get the NIMBY's off BAA's backs, but who would want to buy STN given the pressure from the rich and powerful anti-expansion group. I'm surprised STN got built in the first place.
Joe Curry is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 19:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yet your views elsewhere suggest a less indifferent opinion....

"Looks to me like a sole BAA interest at EDI will feed it the sort of
menu it has been lacking in the past.
Just imagine the shock waves when Scottish Airports PLC moves it's HQ
to Edinburgh?

Imagine also the shock waves as a new Abbotsinch owner starts laying
off staff?"

"Under new ownership. Long Haul will thrive at EDI.. IMHO"

"EDI would have separate owners ones who would not be show any protectionism for other Scottish branches"

"Because EDI does not have to be tied. It will compete under separate ownership"

"Imagine how much better EDI would fare if it had the same facilities
and lower charges"

"One can only project that EDI will go from strength to strength "

"A change of 'tied' management at EDI can only be good surely"

"EDI being more profitable and therefore worth more to a potential
buyer"

https://groups.google.com/group/alt....h/topics?hl=en
CabinCrewe is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 19:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rye
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm surprised STN got built in the first place

I think the USAF saw it as a good idea.
Viscount812 is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 20:28
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Livingston and Edinburgh
Age: 86
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Under new ownership. Long Haul will thrive at EDI.. IMHO"

Perhaps Euro flights will also thrive at GLA? I fail to see why you posted a link to a usenet group that hardly highlights what you intended. FWIW, what did you intend? Independendent ownership of Scotland's central belt airports would lead to more healthy competition surely? Something the Competition Commission strived for. Would you prefer the Status Quo?
Joe Curry is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 20:31
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Livingston and Edinburgh
Age: 86
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the USAF saw it as a good idea.

I doubt the NIMBYs had moved in at that time.?
Joe Curry is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 22:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Darkest Lincs
Posts: 544
Received 96 Likes on 55 Posts
All I can say is, that in the last year LGW has improved a great deal in terms of internal decoration, facilities etc. STN meanwhile is in a time-warp -stuck in the 80s.Ok, the shops are nice, but the passsenger facilities are not. The problem is - why should BAA spend any money on STN, knowing that in due course they will have to sell the airport?
wowzz is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.