Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Ryanair - 8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Mar 2011, 05:41
  #721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MOL seems to get more 'strange' every day....ready for the rubber room perhaps?

I don't see what is so crazy about this idea. Granted, I think Ryanair may be a decade or two ahead of schedule but I think that it's a foregone conclusion that one day China will make an airplane just well and just as safe as the USA or Europe and likely significantly cheaper.

Ahead of his time, maybe. Crazy? Nope.
MountainBear is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 05:58
  #722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unsophisticated negotiation skills epitomized!

As if Boeing and Airbus can't see past such a stupid tactic.

In spite of all of the 'nearly there's' The Russians and certainly not the Chinese are yet able to manufacture an aircraft that reaches wester levels of reliability and safety.

In the Russian case the problem is expense of operation. As even Aeroflot admitted, the economics of current Russian airlines just don't compare to Airbusses and Boeings. In such a low-margin industry as low cost airlines there is no way Ryanair could make them work.

And Chinese airliners? Perhaps in 20 years but no way right now. Just look at the AVIC DC9 copy for a perfect example of why you wouldn't do that.

So it does raise a concern that MOL thinks such a stupid negotiation ploy would work. Perhaps Airbus and Boeing should just say 'go right ahead Michael. See the value of MOL's shares plummet then!
A. Le Rhone is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 06:23
  #723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 191
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Would it not have been more plausible if MOL had said Airbus or Embraer?
Stu666 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 07:23
  #724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: non zero
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They can talk as much as they want but surely if they want to continue to be a EULC, they will transition to A320!
non0 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 07:43
  #725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,808
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Since the smug O'Leary crowed about how he 'raped' Boeing over aircraft orders immediately after the 11 Sep 2001 terrorist attack, it's hardly surprising that they aren't prepared to offer such low prices to O'Leary's tawdry airline again.

Boeing have obviously learned that "If you sup with the devil you need a long spoon"!

Boeing and Airbus can survive without Ryanair; one wonders whether the converse applies?
BEagle is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 08:12
  #726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Queensland, Australia
Age: 71
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MOL's penny-pinching style is more than just an Ilyushin....
Bobbsy is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 08:17
  #727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Age: 59
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEagle:

'Since the smug O'Leary crowed about how he 'raped' Boeing'

Do you have a source for this qoute please...

'O'Leary's tawdry airline' which flies close on 70M 'tawdry passengers'
mickyman is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 08:20
  #728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Comic Relief and April Fools Day all rolled into one.

MOL is a joke, he mugged Boeing post 9/11 and got a stack of aircraft at rock bottom prices and now he's got the hump because it's back to the real world.

I very much doubt Ryanair will go Chinese or Russian, it's all willy waving if you ask me.
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 08:34
  #729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
planes like cars

I think MOL needs to also think resale value, ie after he has these mystery jets for 5 or 10 years will he be able to sell them for anything? There's a reason BMWs and Mercedes cost more, they hold their value, and that has a huge impact on total cost of ownership calculations..

Of course the manufacturer may offer to buy their own jets back for a fair price, as the leverage they would get from exposure to a Western airline would be huge...
groundbum is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 08:37
  #730 (permalink)  


Chieftan o'the Pudden Race
 
Join Date: Nov 1997
Location: Scotland usually, and often other parts of Europe
Age: 55
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mickyman
In full flight but aiming to go higher - Business, Frontpage - Independent.ie
Untitled Page
Flypuppy is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 09:17
  #731 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Pikey is almost certainly speaking with all potential aircraft manufacturers, it's what he's paid to do. But whether the talks will progress into orders, assuming the aircraft are developed and deliverable, is another thing. But will other manufacturers play ball? Unlikely. He's going to be screwed over whatever he buys next. And then there's the cost of retraining - will RYR's pilots be able to afford it?

As for Russians and Chinese building to Western standards. No problem, they have excellent designers and engineers. They've just never had a large enough market for Western style aircraft - until now. They are not going away and every day they improve their products. Their engineers are every bit as capable as Boeing's and they have the full support of their governments - If the same support happens for Boeing or Airbus someone will shout "Foul!"
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 10:03
  #732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Age: 59
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flypuppy

Thanks for the reference re:the shameful comment.

Piltdown Man

Your comments are negated by the use of the term 'Pikey'

MM

Last edited by mickyman; 9th Mar 2011 at 13:39.
mickyman is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 10:16
  #733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEagle:'Since the smug O'Leary crowed about how he 'raped' Boeing'
mickeyman mon ami
It's also in Siobhan Creaton's book, also well worth a read if you can.....you might learn how MOL got so very rich and treats his staff like sh1t. Not a tabloid sting by any means, just a look back about how Ryanair ended up where they are.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 10:39
  #734 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Age: 59
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skipness:

Im not naive - but some comments are allowable/funny/stupid and some comments are not.

MM
mickyman is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 11:17
  #735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England
Age: 65
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In reply to 411a

"as one Russian new type crashed just awhile ago"

As have Boeing's, Airbus and other aircraft. Russian aircraft design isn't too shabby, if the aircraft were flown to western standards the hull loss stats would improve dramatically.
The TU154M that did the emergency landing at a disused field in Russia looks like it'll fly out soon, care to emulate that with any equivalent western type?

The only aircraft I can recall that passengers were wary of was the DC-10, think yourself lucky you flew the other Tri.
Momoe is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 12:41
  #736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im not naive - but some comments are allowable/funny/stupid and some comments are not.
I agree entirely, a CEO publically mentioning he "raped" his main supplier is not professional.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 14:11
  #737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Dublin
Age: 34
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apart from of course a decent replacement for older 738's why doesn;t O'Leary look at the E195. This would be perfect for Ryanair to make profit from smaller destinations but still be able to pack the passengers in!
NorthernCounties is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 17:49
  #738 (permalink)  

L'enfant Terrible
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The bar of Mumbles rugby club
Age: 42
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE]O'Leary's tawdry airline' which flies close on 70M 'tawdry passengers/QUOTE]

That would be the one, yes.
SmilingKnifed is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 18:24
  #739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: England
Age: 59
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SmilingKnifed

Arrogance catching is it ?

MM
mickyman is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2011, 22:18
  #740 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't see what is so crazy about this idea. Granted, I think Ryanair may be a decade or two ahead of schedule but I think that it's a foregone conclusion that one day China will make an airplane just well and just as safe as the USA or Europe and likely significantly cheaper.
They already assembling Airbus', how long ago were they doing the same with cars and look what their car industry is now.
racedo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.