Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Monarch -2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd May 2011, 11:09
  #1661 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even if the AGP and SSH were only carrying 200 pax it would still make sense to send the 330 to AGP. Two and a half hours each way with half load rather than over five each way with a half load.
longarm is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 12:04
  #1662 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Egcc7955

You will more than likely find the A330 is down to operate the AGP for the summer season and the flight is sold as such.
However if the loads on a particular flight are low enough, this allowing for a different type to operate and a spare a/c is available, then an a/c swap may happen.
This will depend on a/c and crew availability, this some times happens where a A320 will operate in place of a A321.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 12:30
  #1663 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Manchester
Age: 49
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the ZB pax loadings on the MAN-AGP on a Monday morning are greater than the seating capacity of a Mon 752?
If that's the case then I can see why its that way but I wouldn't have loadings would be that great that a 752 couldn't cope with the volume of pax, still we're not paid to ask questions, just do as we're told
EGCC7955 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 21:04
  #1664 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Egcc7955

It would not matter if they were, the ZB is a scheduled flight and the B757 is operating a charter flight, sold to who ever and only one B757 is based in MAN.
Now if we had loads of B757 parked in MAN and the ZB load was low enough then maybe it could be operated by a B757.
I tell you what, l will try and find out the loads tomorrow and see it could have been done., but longarm is going to be correct even it could be done.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 21:43
  #1665 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Egcc,

Think yr missing the point, the LXR is the driver here as it's a charter flight. The market for Egypt has diminished and the extra seats on the 330 are not required (I think originally this flight was planned to operate on a widebody prior to the troubles). So rather than losing the LXR flight, offer a lower capacity aircraft, and instead of having a 330 sit in the deck, add a flight that you know yr get demand for. A AGP is not ideal for a 330, but it will do as a short term measure.
im going in is offline  
Old 22nd May 2011, 22:38
  #1666 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: U.K.
Posts: 1,869
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
But we're all assuming that LXR is the "rightful" place of the widebody as opposed to AGP. AGP, imo, is more of an A330 destination than LXR from a Monarch perspective. Plus the A330 is far from rare in AGP with various carriers.
easyflyer83 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2011, 16:16
  #1667 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To answer the question on loads, they were as follows.
A330 MAN-AGP 269 Pax
A330 AGP-MAN 298 Pax
Followed by a LCA with outbound load of 300+.
B757 MAN-LXR 104 Pax
B757 LXR-MAN 150+ (estimated).
Don't forget the A330 is operating a LCA flight while the B757 is still going outbound to LXR.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 24th May 2011, 22:37
  #1668 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Manchester
Age: 49
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It wasn't a question of missing any point at all, it was merely an enquiry as to why a 752 was on a LXR & a 332 on an AGP & now looking at the pax loadings which Spotty has kindly provided my question has been answered, case closed.
EGCC7955 is offline  
Old 24th May 2011, 22:57
  #1669 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It wasn't a question of missing any point at all, it was merely an enquiry as to why a 752 was on a LXR & a 332 on an AGP & now looking at the pax loadings which Spotty has kindly provided my question has been answered, case closed.
That's what was answered from the start yet queried...

Anyway...

The ''announcment'' is only a day away or so. Anyone have more of an insight other than the rebrand already announced earlier this year?
Cazza_fly is online now  
Old 25th May 2011, 04:45
  #1670 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Other than re-branding, we are going to find out the direction that the airline has planned for the future.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 08:12
  #1671 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What time is the announcement to be made at?
planenut321 is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 09:34
  #1672 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1100 - understand it is all vision and not much detail at this stage
MANTFS is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 12:21
  #1673 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MANCHESTER
Age: 40
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any news yet?
GGDAY is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 14:05
  #1674 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.... damp squib alert....
CabinCrewe is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 14:10
  #1675 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Derby/EMA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Monarch to shortly announce cancellation of 787 order and instead purchase 737NG,s
Topspotter is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 14:17
  #1676 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hemel Hempstead
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont understand why they would order 737NG's, when they have such a healthy size of Airbus SH aircraft - unless this is to replace them? If thats the case we could be seeing some 900ER's/800 mix.
toledoashley is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 14:18
  #1677 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I guess it's what we all thought and nothing major. I guess 737s to help with growth into regional UK market again, as people have already said. Perhaps the order will be big enough for A320 replacements too?
Cazza_fly is online now  
Old 25th May 2011, 14:23
  #1678 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Derby/EMA
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737NG,s will replace the airbuses.
Topspotter is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 14:46
  #1679 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suppose the cancellation charges on the 787's must be huge so it makes commercial sense to run with the B737NG if new aircraft are required.

What is the future for the A300 and A330?

Last edited by TSR2; 25th May 2011 at 14:55. Reason: Question added
TSR2 is offline  
Old 25th May 2011, 15:39
  #1680 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anything been announced? Just curious as "Topspotter" may not be the best username for inside company information!

So is this a really complete rollover of the short haul fleet and a withdrawal from long haul then?
Skipness One Echo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.