Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Monarch -2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Aug 2009, 09:43
  #661 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a horses head with his name on it somewhere about the Luton area!!
Brian Fantana is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 12:54
  #662 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crawley
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hear they have closed down DUB and made all the crew redundant as of oct!!

Sounds like that high ranking ex LCC boss of monarchs needs to sort it out!!
Airbus321-200 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 15:00
  #663 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought DUB was being shut because the charterer has managed to consolidate or reduce their capacity this winter due market conditions. Therefore not requiring a Monarch unit again till next summer!!
Nothing really to do with the boss, this one.
im going in is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 15:32
  #664 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure about the DUB position but questionable decisions are being made.
I heard today that they had an A300 AOG yesterday and have the same problem today , with I assume the same a/c.
Most companies would have subbed the flight out rather than delay pax 12 hours but this has not happenned.
There is plenty of capacity out there so why inconnvienance your passengers by putting them into Hotel for a meal at LGW rather than getting them to their destination ,DLM yesterday CHQ today? Does not make sense to me and can only assume this is a management directive not to offload for reasons best known to the management. Not the way to treat your clients if you want them back next summer. Anyway my thoughts are with the passengers and the redundant crews in DUB if the previous post is true.
The Member is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 15:36
  #665 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In my house
Age: 74
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TSR2

Setting personalities aside for a moments - Monarch's "woes" are no greater or less than any other Airline, or indeed Company, operating in the UK today.

The fuel hedge position for this year turned out to be not brilliant (easy to say with 20/20 hindsight) given that the spot price dropped off a cliff. This wasn't forecast so the management, whatever you think of them, acted in accordance with the informed thinking at the time. As did most other Airlines, or at least those who were credit worthy enough to secure hedges. The hedge looks much healthier for next year so the "burden" of last years high fuel prices, which of course effects everyone else too, will wash through the books soon.

Yields are soft, as they are with every Airline in the world, but unlike others Monarch's load factors high, a good sign for customer loyalty and confidence.

In short: hard times but the hatches are being battened down and all parties are throwing in what they can to weather the storm. If anyone chooses to make inferences from a pay cut then they need to make the same inferences of BA, Virgin, Thomas Cook, Thompson (TUI) et al - who have all AGREED their own sacrifices already. To be honest I'd be more concerned by a Co. that wasn't being proactive in maximising its cash position in times like these. Monarch has had 42 years in business and I'd personally bet my mortgage on another 42.

Last edited by Jonny-no-stars; 25th Aug 2009 at 15:57.
Jonny-no-stars is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 15:54
  #666 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Member, there are currently no AOG aircraft within the Monarch fleet. AB6NS was AOG yesterday and required an MEC change. As for plenty of surplus capacity in the market!! that is true when covering a narrow body, however it cant be said when trying to cover 361 passengers.
im going in is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 16:41
  #667 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Im Going In for the update. I am glad the Monarch fleet is now serviceable however as the CHQ passengers have only just left some 8 hours late it still begs the question why no offload.
I would have thought ,if passengers were asked ,that they would prefer to go on a narrow body and get to their destination on schedule than await a wide body aircraft with a 8 to 12 hour delay.
The Member is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 17:20
  #668 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: British
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Member, if you ran an airline you would sub two narrows to cover an 8 hour delay on a widebody aircraft? Good for you. It would be a short management career I'm sure.

' Get your tenners for a fiver here, ten pound notes for a fiver'

I do feel sorry for the pax, but thats aviation.
Tight Seat is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 17:57
  #669 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jonny-no-stars

Thanks for the information. Must have a few people on here who think they can do someone elses job better.

Good to hear that load factors are high.
TSR2 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 18:04
  #670 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Various at the moment
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Anyone have a contact for their Nav Services Department at EGGW ?
dc9-32 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 19:25
  #671 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At ZB prices, I would doubt they would be losing money.
TSR2 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 21:11
  #672 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

Non Starter must be 19 years old, so a tribute to all the engineering back up she and the 3 others get, that all A300's fly mostly reliably every year.

If I owned a 20 year old car, would it start and run and then do 50,000 miles per year, every day?
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 06:32
  #673 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Luton/Tenerife
Posts: 962
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I owned a 20 year old car, would it start and run and then do 50,000 miles

With schedule servicing and maintenance yes it should run reliably.
ericlday is online now  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 07:52
  #674 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: oop north
Age: 54
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fact those A300 -600,s achieve the dispatch reliabilty they do is tribute to the monarch engineers, they do an amazing job keeping those things in the air
smudgethecat is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 10:33
  #675 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brighton uk
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep the A300 is a trusty work cart for Monarch
i guess we will see it down in Bournemouth in November when hopefully it will operate the usual Bath Travel charter to New York again , albeit via Gander unless its an A330 this year !
MARKEYD is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 13:01
  #676 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tight Seat, for the love of god please don’t open up a debate about Monarch Subchartering policy

Logic, reason, common sense and passenger convenience are among the words have yet to reach the lexicon of those clowns in Crawley that make all the decisions.
renort is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 14:41
  #677 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In my house
Age: 74
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
renort

Dynamic program management is carried out in Luton not Crawley. Your lack of knowledge on this subject could be interpreted as being analogous of your knowledge of MON customer care.
Jonny-no-stars is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 15:49
  #678 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: British
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
renort,

What are you on about? My reply was to 'Member'.

You have some sort of complex about Monarch Subchartering policy?
Tight Seat is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 16:42
  #679 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MARKEYD, l think the B757 is going to operate the BOH-JFK this winter, but l might be wrong.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 16:44
  #680 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tight Seat, it’s an open discussion no?

Johnny, 'Dynamic Programme Management’ is hampered by their bizarre and frankly inexplicable commercial agendas.
renort is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.