Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER - 4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jan 2007, 13:14
  #241 (permalink)  

Pilot of the Airwaves
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Close to the Med
Age: 74
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This has yet to be brought in and I cannot see it being so in the way its been 'publicised'.
By dwlpl.

Then it is more likely than not to appear!

Just remember the extra fuel you will use to get to LPL in your car and then a possible extra £2 per pax as well for security reasons.

Sounds like a no brainer.
IB4138 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2007, 14:01
  #242 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..... not as 'publicised'.

Its (the Security Charge) got to provide something different from what they (the airport) provides to passengers now with the reason being the passenger has already paid the Security Charge within the air fare.

Well thats the explanation given me by a friend who works in Trading Standards.
dwlpl is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2007, 14:08
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Manchester, England
Age: 58
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read elsewhere that the machines are already installed, but not yet in use. An expensive mistake and egg on someone's face if it doesn't happen.
All this MAN v LPL bickering is pointless. LPL is bound to have a superior overall terminal as they had the benefit of starting from scratch a few years back, whilst MAN (in T1 at least) have to tweak what they have, that is many years older. T2 and T3 are bit less problematic for the same reason. The only way this would be solved would be if MAN copied LHR, and built a new terminal that would give sufficient extra capacity to allow T1 to be closed for a couple of years whilst it was knocked down and rebuilt - financial constraints make that unlikely.
I flew in and out of T1 last weekend, and it could be worse, a lot worse. As usual when travelling from Amsterdam I looked at both EZY and Jet2, compared prices and the relative convenience, and this time opted for MAN (I also use LPL sometimes). The ease of use of the 2 airports is not sufficiently different to push me towards one or the other; the ticket price difference and the distance from the 2 airports to my final destination is.
If both airports were popular to be interlined through eh route to a final destination then the rivalry might be bigger than in the minds of a few locals at each place, but the nature of their respective traffic means that this also is a minute consideration.
This is not to suggest that MAN is a beacon of good service or management, but spotters allied to both MAN and LPL do sometimes demonstrate a stunning ignorance of what matters to 99% of passengers!
Curious Pax is online now  
Old 12th Jan 2007, 20:19
  #244 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silly Me
I "thought" that an "Aviation Security Charge" was already being levied by Grabbing Gordon....
bb
wiccan is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2007, 21:45
  #245 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MANCHESTER
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Curious Pax

Thankyou for your well written and considered
post.........I concur with most of what you have
written.

MM
ManchesterMan is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2007, 05:47
  #246 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAN bigger on Low cost flights

Bagsgo I read your above post and you got me thinking. Yes Manchester airport has more LC flights but In my view the LOW Fares are much more widespread from LPL. Obviously thats because costs are lower, and there is FR and EZY on a big scale from LPL.

Bmibaby is borderline LCC in my view and if it were not classified as LCC would MAN still be a bigger LCC operations airport that LPL?

Jet2 sure are a good example ofLCC they will be leading the way at MAN for a long time to come I think!
EI-BUD is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2007, 17:08
  #247 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just read on another forum that ZB are set to announce some new routes out of MAN within the next couple of weeks. Any ideas as to what these might be? Will there be any surprises from Monarch here or will it be the usual bucket and spade Spanish destinations and, if so, what? They've pretty much got Spain covered now!
FlyZB is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2007, 17:13
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EI-BUD
..... and there is FR and EZY on a big scale from LPL....
Between them, EZY and FR, carry around 400,000 passengers per month now from Liverpool.

Last edited by dwlpl; 13th Jan 2007 at 18:03.
dwlpl is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2007, 05:02
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem with MAG is that at the top there are now no aviation people. Very sad really but the bean counters/councillors are most definitely in charge.
emaint2003 is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2007, 19:41
  #250 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IB4138
By dwlpl.
Then it is more likely than not to appear!
Just remember the extra fuel you will use to get to LPL in your car
Don't forget the large ribbon of population that can get to LPL easier than MAN, e.g. Lancashire, N Wales, Warrington, Skem etc. etc.

MAN has had a monopoly on the region for years. Now the free market has allowed others to reach critical mass (LPL etc) who are providing an interesting alternative, better in some respects and worse in others, but alternatives nonetheless. MAN's figures are therefore slowing and plateauing, but the usual MAN-supporters-but-competition-deniers can't accept that new Reality. "Reality" I say. MAN must accept the Reality and adjust their performance and attitude to compete in the new Reality. That means customer service, usability, price, access, car parking, working infrastructure, delay management etc.
Momentary Lapse is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2007, 20:03
  #251 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so people, w.w.w ?
bigmuk is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2007, 22:54
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,504
Received 173 Likes on 94 Posts
As others have already said Saudi are on the way, B777 three times a week I heard. Anyone know what time of day?
TURIN is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2007, 22:58
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re Saudia

My contact reports that the Saudia request was for twice weekly B777 via Geneva.
In at 1030Z and out again 1230Z on a Monday and Friday.
I'll believe it when I see it !!
Anyone heard of Great Wall Cargo starting up ops from April with B747F?
What a Great Wall he's bangin' his head on ??!!
Night night
Adola
Adola69 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2007, 15:21
  #254 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like MAN wont be seeing the 777 from CO. They didnt get PVG, so they had 2 777's to spare, but man is staying 2x 757-200's! BRU get a 777, GVA gets a 767-400 and DUB goes from 2 757's (one via SNN) two one 762 direct, and one 757 via SNN!
johnrizzo2000 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2007, 17:16
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why when Manchester closes due to weather, do they throw up a crap emergency arrivals board.
Mouser is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2007, 19:07
  #256 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bye Bye KA, hello more CX

I understand that Dragonair cease to operate under their own flight numbers with effect from 1st February. KA535/535 becomes CX039/040 - not 100pc certain of the new CX numbers.
Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 19th Jan 2007, 19:14
  #257 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by Scottie Dog
I understand that Dragonair cease to operate under their own flight numbers with effect from 1st February. KA535/535 becomes CX039/040 - not 100pc certain of the new CX numbers.
Think you're wrong on that. I'll find out for definate and get back to you. It's all to do with routes/slots or something, the routes are KA's not CX's just as CX's routes are not KA's.

Anyway the KA 747's are being replaced by their 747-400's from the summer on that route.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2007, 15:36
  #258 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: England
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the MAN LPL issue.

I would much rather fly from MAN with BA,LS,ZB or WW to Europe and NOT pay extra charges than fly for a 'penny' plus excessive extras with FR and EZY at LPL.

MAN has better connections across the globe, better demand and excellent facilities, especially on the internal flights.

For example:

VLM: Started with 5 times daily from LPL - now twice daily.
MAN will operate 12 times daily later this year - MAJOR DIFFERENCE!
Add the other carriers that fly to London from the MAN: BA,BMI,LS and AB. To become a great airport, the internal and international connections need to be in place and operating efficiently - LPL struggles in the domestic sector.

BLK offers THREE times more seats to LON than LPL! This shouldn't be happening!

Another example:

BE stated that a new base would be opened at LPL for many domestic flights. Now it operates weekend flights from Belfast.

If LPL could start to grab more Long Haul and Domestic routes, and put less effort into the European routes, then maybe they can be classed in the same league as MAN.

Long way to go for LPL to compare at all to MAN.


Continued on: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...56#post3080956
gms1991 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.