Flybe - 2
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am a regular passenger on BA Connect services, particularly on the Southampton-Manchester route. I choose BA Connect out of choice as I have flown Flybe quite a number of times and was not impressed. I am truly dreading any future flights on that route now.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: down-route
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA finally leaves the regions
The writing has been on the wall for ages. Many of us have been saying that all the base-closures and fleet run-downs were simply a way of preparing BACX/BAConnect for sale.
How ironic renaming BACX as BAConnect when in reality BA was trying to dis-Connect BACX from BA. More like BADisconnect.
It's taken BA 5 years to achieve this objective which was started by Rod Eddington moving the Airbus out of BHX, the B737 out of MAN and the RJ100 out of LGW. British Airways has finally left the regions.
A great shame for all those who were happy working for Brymon, British Regional Airlines and Manx. It's not surprising many of them don't trust BA.
Who will operate the LCY routes? Will these routes be operated purely by BA secondees? The RJ100 leases expire in 18 months time, will they be replaced by Airbus 318 or will this be the time to wind-up the LCY operation?
How ironic renaming BACX as BAConnect when in reality BA was trying to dis-Connect BACX from BA. More like BADisconnect.
It's taken BA 5 years to achieve this objective which was started by Rod Eddington moving the Airbus out of BHX, the B737 out of MAN and the RJ100 out of LGW. British Airways has finally left the regions.
A great shame for all those who were happy working for Brymon, British Regional Airlines and Manx. It's not surprising many of them don't trust BA.
Who will operate the LCY routes? Will these routes be operated purely by BA secondees? The RJ100 leases expire in 18 months time, will they be replaced by Airbus 318 or will this be the time to wind-up the LCY operation?
Read the Regional press releases on the Flybe site. Cutting through the spin they will tell you a lot:
- lots of talk of commitment to JER, GCI, BHX, MAN, SOU, NWI, EXT, LBA etc. No such wording on the BRS release
- bases with at least 10 a/c at BHX and MAN
- "lifeline" routes like LGW-INV, LGW-IOM to be retained
- intention is to retain BACON IOM Maint Base, to "supplement" EXT
- lots of talk of commitment to JER, GCI, BHX, MAN, SOU, NWI, EXT, LBA etc. No such wording on the BRS release
- bases with at least 10 a/c at BHX and MAN
- "lifeline" routes like LGW-INV, LGW-IOM to be retained
- intention is to retain BACON IOM Maint Base, to "supplement" EXT
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Somewhere in the Irish Sea
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A few months ago Evans stood up in front of the Isle of Man business community telling us all how committed BA were to the IOM. He found much scepticism - how right we were.
They bought Manx Airlines, ended our LHR link, cut back on just about every other route, and then introduced the ridiculous BA Connect concept where business people ended up paying more for less service on the LGW route. And he thought this was a good thing for the Island?
If ever there was an individual with his head up his own a$$, then it was this man.
They bought Manx Airlines, ended our LHR link, cut back on just about every other route, and then introduced the ridiculous BA Connect concept where business people ended up paying more for less service on the LGW route. And he thought this was a good thing for the Island?
If ever there was an individual with his head up his own a$$, then it was this man.
Interesting to see BA retaining a 15% stake. WW is not daft, I should think he is a little nervouse of losing influence over all those peak time slots at BHX and MAN. Who knows when they may need them.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BHX
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This will hopefully create a more versatile competitor out of the regions, mixing BA Connect's established services to major European business cities with flybe's decisions to serve leisure destinations on the continent. Combine this with an increasingly successful brand, a fleet of aircraft which can actually compete or fly under the radar of the likes of Ryanair and a generally low cost base - this should hopefully be better for the future of the airline, and in turn their crews. What the passengers will think is another story? For example, will flybe move their flights operated by 5 based BHX based aircraft to T2 and what will happen to BA's ground staff, will they go to Swissport?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: LCY
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite. BA is going to retain 10 RJ100's after they've sold off BA CON to FlyBE to operate routes to/from LCY. WW just said at their presentation this morning that they will expand the number of destinations they serve (out of LCY) and increase the frequencies to those they already serve (EDI, FRA and MXP)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: At the foot of the Lammermuirs
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A 15% stake will give BA no control over the slots. They may have negociated a position on the flybe board but that would only be to represent their interests.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: At the foot of the Lammermuirs
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by flybe.com
BA will ensure that the new business has sufficient funding in order to achieve its growth targets and the transition out of the current BA Connect fleet. In return it will acquire a 15% stake in the new business.
It would also seem that BA will fund the costs associated with returning EMBs and Dash8s to the lessors.
It sounds like a good deal for flybe. They get crews, routes, bases and (for a short time) fleet capacity tio help them grow.
The only costs that flybe will have incurred in this acquisition is for various professional services (lawyers, merchant bankers, other advisers, etc, etc)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Manchester, England
Age: 58
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm trying to make sense of the aircraft numbers they quote, and they don't quite add up. Using Jethro's excellent site I reckon current numbers are:
BA Connect:
4 146s
8 Dash 8-300s
28 E145s
(and 10 RJ100s, but these all seem to be tied to the LCY operation from what has been said and not part of the deal)
Flybe:
12 146s (2 due to retire by the end of the year)
25 Dash 8-400s
1 E195 (1 more due in service this year)
This totals 77 aircraft expected to be in service at 1st Jan, when they hope to complete the deal (compared to the quote of 82 when the transaction is closed on the Flybe website). They then expect to consolidate to 70 aircraft by the end of 2007.
Flybe currently have announced total orders for 45 400s (including the 25 mentioned) and for 14 195s (including those above), plus 12 options. Thus they will either take beyond the end of 2007 to retire the BA Connect aircraft, or will exercise the 195 options AND accelerate their delivery (the last of the first 14 195s is currently due in 2009); or will take longer to retire the 146s currently with Flybe than I thought.
BA Connect:
4 146s
8 Dash 8-300s
28 E145s
(and 10 RJ100s, but these all seem to be tied to the LCY operation from what has been said and not part of the deal)
Flybe:
12 146s (2 due to retire by the end of the year)
25 Dash 8-400s
1 E195 (1 more due in service this year)
This totals 77 aircraft expected to be in service at 1st Jan, when they hope to complete the deal (compared to the quote of 82 when the transaction is closed on the Flybe website). They then expect to consolidate to 70 aircraft by the end of 2007.
Flybe currently have announced total orders for 45 400s (including the 25 mentioned) and for 14 195s (including those above), plus 12 options. Thus they will either take beyond the end of 2007 to retire the BA Connect aircraft, or will exercise the 195 options AND accelerate their delivery (the last of the first 14 195s is currently due in 2009); or will take longer to retire the 146s currently with Flybe than I thought.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The route map does not make any sense. For example, no INV at all, but lots of routes from BRS that has not been mentioned in the press releases as a future market.
Last edited by virginblue; 3rd Nov 2006 at 13:25.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite. BA is going to retain 10 RJ100's after they've sold off BA CON to FlyBE to operate routes to/from LCY. WW just said at their presentation this morning that they will expand the number of destinations they serve (out of LCY) and increase the frequencies to those they already serve (EDI, FRA and MXP)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: where ever i wake up!!!!
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Flybe press releases for each base makes interesting reading if you are in BRS then it doesnt look good as there seems to be no commitment to that base from Flybe.