Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Virgin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Apr 2006, 20:58
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I hear from friends who are flt deck at Virgin, the A340-600 certainly does not live up to expectations... Too many faults and problems to go into here, but the VS management seemingly got a good deal on the aircraft and also got incentives towards taking more A340-600s.

The B777, although having only 2 engines will be the next big thing to hit VS.
As the A340 and B747 fleet go in for maintenance, the '4 engines...' logo is being withdrawn.

The A340-300 fleet will slowly head for Nigeria (VS Nigeria) and any other airline that will have them. The B747-400s will soldier on, from LHR, LGW and MAN. I beleive a couple more are being sourced.

The other rumour is that the crew will fly the B747/B777 as a joint type rating however I dont know if this would be possible, but it is what I have heard from VS flt deck crew.
tristar500 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2006, 21:13
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ???
Age: 58
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try "crew to fly 330/343/346" & you'll be getting closer to the truth!!!!!
Denzil is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2006, 23:08
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tristar500
From what I hear from friends who are flt deck at Virgin, the A340-600 certainly does not live up to expectations...
No doubt they are Boeing flight deck! The A346 has had a few problems, as does any new aircraft, and Virgin is regretting being launch customer as the extra workload is excessive for what is a relatively small company, but in general the company is happy with the A346.

The B777, although having only 2 engines will be the next big thing to hit VS.
...say the same Boeing pilots, hoping that they'll get to fly it!

As the A340 and B747 fleet go in for maintenance, the '4 engines...' logo is being withdrawn.
See my post above. The B744 never carried this slogan.

The A340-300 fleet will slowly head for Nigeria (VS Nigeria) and any other airline that will have them.
Two A343s have gone to VK. Another 3 or 4 are due to leave the company over the next year. Where they go is the lessors' problem.

The B747-400s will soldier on, from LHR, LGW and MAN. I beleive a couple more are being sourced.
Soldier on? They're not that old! The most recent were delivered in 2002. I don't know where you get the rumour about a couple more from; GE-powered B744s are not common on the secondhand market, and there has been no internal statement about any search for more.

The other rumour is that the crew will fly the B747/B777 as a joint type rating however I dont know if this would be possible, but it is what I have heard from VS flt deck crew.
The possibility was raised by VS a few years ago when the then B744 fleet management went to assess the difficulty of transitioning from the B744 to the B777, but it needs CAA/JAA approval. As no current B744/B777 operators have sponsored or sought such an approval, it seems highly unlikely that VS would attempt to do so.

One of the problems with the idea of Virgin operating big twins is that it has no ETOPS approvals and, as far as I know, has not been assessed with ETOPS in mind. What time and labour costs would be involved in obtaining ETOPS approvals I really have no idea, not being an engineer (perhaps Denzil could comment?) but I think it's not as straightforward as it looks at first sight.
Digitalis is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 04:59
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:
As the A340 and B747 fleet go in for maintenance, the '4 engines...' logo is being withdrawn.

See my post above. The B744 never carried this slogan.
Is the '4 engines ....' logo being removed from the A340 fleet during maintenance? Yes or no?
TopBunk is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 06:22
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

The B744 never carried this slogan
It was 'Fly a Younger Fleet'

Last edited by spannersatcx; 21st Apr 2006 at 06:37.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2006, 07:42
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You lot need to get yourselves over to airliners.net for a refresher on Virgin's various straplines!

All the A340s carry '4 engines 4 longhaul' on the outboard engine cowlings (except for the odd one after an engine change). Some carry it on the upper rear fuselage, some have other slogans. The one that has largely been removed recently is the 'Backing the Bid - London 2012' slogan which is no longer appropriate, and explains those aircraft flying with a naked back end! Other slogans you may or may not see are 'Mine's longer than yours' (A346 only), and 'You never forget your first time'. There are others.

The B744 does not carry, and never has carried, the '4 engines 4 longhaul' slogan. There are no cowling slogans either. The rear fuselage slogans include 'The Power of 4', 'Better by 4', You never forget your first time', 'Fly a Younger Fleet', and there are still one or two carrying 'Backing the Bid'. There are a few that have lost that one and are currently slogan-less, but Virgin rarely goes for long without some new pithy one-liner appearing.

If you're all basing your speculation on such flimsy evidence as the aircraft slogans, at least make an effort to do some research before you make your opinion public!
Digitalis is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 08:10
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Suffolk
Age: 40
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Virgin

I have heard from a very good source that Virgin Atlantic is going to use one of their nice new A380 on the Gatwick to Orlando route next year.

Although i said from a good source can anyone tell me if this is correct or not.

Craig
night hawk 150 is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 08:18
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will they have 380's next year?
qwertyuiop is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 08:25
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: London & Edinburgh
Age: 38
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has work been done at LGW to make it A380 ok?

Jordan
Jordan D is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 08:39
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 476
Received 15 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by qwertyuiop
Will they have 380's next year?
Thought the first one was originally scheduled for 2008, and apparently, there seems to be some doubt about that. It may be later
jethro15 is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 09:23
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Virgin to use A380 on GTW-MCO
Can Zlin (Holeslov) support an A380 flight to MCO?

(OK, I know the thread is about Gatwick, but why not use the correct airport code....?)
jetstream7 is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 09:40
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: planet earth
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not true. No A380 next year (if ever) and MCO and LGW not ready to accept aircraft.
Yes sack your "reliable" source.
sevenforeseven is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 10:57
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The delivery date for Virgin's first A380 is scheduled as November 2008. The current feeling is that problems at Airbus will slip this to Spring 2009. Virgin's A380-800s are being configured for the LHR-JFK/LAX/SFO markets, not the bucket-and-spade LGW-MCO route.

Your source is worse than useless.

Scroggs
scroggs is offline  
Old 4th May 2006, 14:15
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just looked at MCO website at www.orlandoairports.net/goaa/main.htm and at the top they show that they are ready for the A380 But for who? Would not spend money doing conversion for no reason.
Spiral is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 15:41
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: southeast england
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sevenforeseven

Reliable source may be wrong, but for info Gatwick is fully capable of accepting A380 today if one turned up. RW and taxiway infrastructure is in place, only stands need upgrading, and in the meantime a/c can be parked under Airfield Ops guidance ( might mean temporary taxiway restrictions behind it though. ). Don't know about MCO.
vespasia is offline  
Old 7th May 2006, 16:40
  #136 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If MCO was already doing refit it may have been only a small extra amount to fit A380 spec and thus leave the option open.

When DUB gets 10L/28R going (whenever that is) hopefully a similar attitude will prevail - little chance of it though.
MarkD is offline  
Old 8th May 2006, 20:39
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the last I heard......

was VS was offered A380 Q4 2009, does not want to introduce another A/C and have similar problems a la A346. So expect a VS A380 in 2010. This is all dependent on VS engineering plus any offers from boeing !!
fadec_primary_channel is offline  
Old 9th May 2006, 04:20
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Suffolk UK
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The dates I gave are accurate and authoritative; they came from Virgin's DFO. While the delivery date could slip further if Airbus hit more problems, the early 2009 in-service date is the best available estimate.

From the first point at which the A380 was ordered, Virgin was adamant that it would not be a launch customer for the aircraft, as the extra workload and subsequent costs involved were not justifiable in what is a relatively small airline, as the introduction of the A346 showed.
scroggs is offline  
Old 9th May 2006, 20:30
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ???
Age: 58
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the VS DFO never tells porky pies!!!!!!!!!
Denzil is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2006, 15:25
  #140 (permalink)  
Considerably Bemused Wannabe
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I've read that opting for the 777-300ER to replace ageing VIR 744's may prove problematic as certain Caribbean destinations don't have the infrastructure to handle these aircraft, due to the nose and body gear being spaced too far apart. Resulting in taxi problems for such aircraft as the 77W / A346.

However, I see that AF are currently replacing their Orly based 743 fleet with High Density 777-300ER's for their Caribbean routes. I'm not sure what destinations AF are intending to operate with the 77W's.

Can anybody tell me please what VS Caribbean destinations could not, without modification, handle either the A346 or the 77W?

Cheers folks.
scruggs is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.