Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

GATWICK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jan 2016, 18:09
  #3041 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ballymena
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well Garuda is still showing Lgw flights for me, GA 88 and 89 right through to May.
True Blue is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 16:19
  #3042 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was just thinking that isn't it about time Etihad or Qatar started Gatwick flights. With the success of Emirates at Gatwick, Cathay starting Hong Kong flights in September and Heathrow not expanding anytime soon surely they could sustain a daily flight that hits main connection banks to compete with Emirates. They could also use aircraft like the 787-8/9 for this route.

I also thought that Qatar had announced Gatwick with the 787-8 due to commence in May but it never went ahead.

What are your thoughts?
AvGeek1 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2016, 21:28
  #3043 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,571
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Etihad used to run an A343 from the North Terminal and Qatar an A333 from the South, later the North, however both moved to consolidate London operations at LHR. The only way they'd do a Cathay and return I think is if they couldn't grow any more at LHR. However both a re growing, Etihad are slowly moving to all A380 and Qatar have managed to source a few more slots as well as upsizing from A330 / A319 (no really) to A380.

Etihad left end of Summer 2006, Qatar end of summer 2011. Emirates do really well but they are quite literally exceptional.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 12:53
  #3044 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks as though Thomas Cook are flying twice a week to Orlando from the end of May. Was looking as though Dubai was going to overtake it as the busiest long haul route but given the shear number of flights on it this summer I am not so sure.

BA - 13 weekly 772
DU - 2 weekly 788
TCX - 2 weekly 332
TOM - 2 weekly 788 (SFB)
VS - 18 weekly 744

Factor in the following from Stansted:

TCX - 10 weekly 332
TOM - 1 weekly 788 (SFB)

Looks as though London to Orlando will be the busiest it has been in some time this year!
adfly is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2016, 13:28
  #3045 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LV
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10 weekly from STN ?
CabinCrewe is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2016, 21:55
  #3046 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ballymena
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There has been some speculation about Norwegian going east from Lgw. Why would Singapore not be considered? I've never seen it mentioned. I think I am right in thinking that Singapore has had open skies for years now. Any thoughts?

TB
True Blue is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2016, 23:12
  #3047 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 377
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would Singapore not be considered? I've never seen it mentioned. I think I am right in thinking that Singapore has had open skies for years now. Any thoughts?
One of the most expensive cities in Asia, if not the world. Competing nearby destinations in Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia etc offer the tourist far more in terms of beach resorts, value for money etc.

As far as the airline industry goes, lots of LCC competition already from the likes of Scoot, Tiger, Jetstar, Air Asia etc, while SIA and the MEB3 have the connecting/stopover/business/convention traffic sown up.

By starting with the North Atlantic for their initial foray into longhaul low cost Norwegian chose well. Very high traffic volume, generally lousy competition and with a high cost base, so relatively easy pickings for them. They will need to tread a bit more carefully when venturing east....

Last edited by Logohu; 26th Jan 2016 at 23:20. Reason: typo
Logohu is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2016, 06:36
  #3048 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hemel Hempstead
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
South Africa would be a good market for Norwegian, although it looks like Thomas Cook as got in early there. Also some cities in Latin America - BA have already seen the potential with Costa Rica and Peru. Asia would be a tough one.
toledoashley is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2016, 11:43
  #3049 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Garuda Indonesia to launch non-stop Heathrow-Jakarta service

and so the cycle repeats.
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2016, 15:43
  #3050 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good value - especially in Business Class
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 10:56
  #3051 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southampton, U.K
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vueling

Starting 3x weekly Santiago De Compostela for 30th March.

Vueling announces flights between London-Gatwick and Santiago de Compostela « vuelingnews. La información al punto de Vueling
adfly is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 13:20
  #3052 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Regrettably far from 50°N
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Intriguingly, it seems BA Cityflyer is to operate some LGW-JER/EDI flights on the weekend of 27-8 Feb. Is this part of a wider programme of flying (have I missed something)? I had thought there were Scope agreements which prevented such ops; seemingly not.

Last edited by Aero Mad; 31st Jan 2016 at 14:03.
Aero Mad is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 14:06
  #3053 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cornwall, uk
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scope yes
Doesn't cover mainline chartering cityflyer to operate for them as they do others !

My guess is it's due to staffing issues at LGW.


cs
cornishsimon is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 15:25
  #3054 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 74
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm not sure about this but, haven't City Flyer operated one or two Gatwick flights in the recent past ?
kcockayne is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 18:05
  #3055 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 42
Posts: 1,571
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA are feeling stronger than they were, outsourced below the wing, Engineering cover (allegedly) going soon, SCOPE has gotta be in their sights. It would allow them to be so much more effective in certain markets.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 19:42
  #3056 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: england
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
City Flyer at LGW.

kcockayne, I think a few flights have diverted to LGW due poor viz at LCY. Not sure if there have been any scheduled stuff.
yotty is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2016, 21:55
  #3057 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 74
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Thinking harder about it, I distinctly remember seeing FR24s arr/dep pages at Gatwick & Jersey showing E195s on a couple of occasions (it may have been Nov 2015) on Sat/Sun. I didn't actually see the a/c involved though - so it could well have been an error.
kcockayne is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 11:41
  #3058 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: another place
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope Norwegian pick up the Moscow route if east is the rumour.
Deep and fast is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 16:24
  #3059 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Highly doubt Moscow is in Norwegian's sights, if it didn't work for easy why will it work for them?
T250 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2016, 17:03
  #3060 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Code:
Highly doubt Moscow is in Norwegian's sights, if it didn't work for easy why will it work for them
Sanctions and resulting economical recession in Russia with harder VISA requirements in both directions have done for the EasyJet Moscow services for the time being.

From the UK side no one else in the flexible fares bracket is likely to try again any time soon.

For certain Norwegian wouldn't even get the traffic rights if they tried.(Needs to be a UK or Russian registered carrier)

Russia/UK bi-literals are very restrictive, hence the former Transeuro code share arrangement with EasyJet.

Those Bi-laterals are probably the reason S7 can't get traffic rights into the Oneairline hub either.

Sure they need a UK carrier to match and whom would give it a go ?
rutankrd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.