Loganair
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given that Loganair are often the only commercial traffic on frequency, why on Earth have they started using alpha numeric callsigns bearing no relation to the flight number. Surely it can't be callsign confusion?
Just curious. Keep thinking they sound more like easyJet with those numbers and that was confusing me.
Anyone know?
Just curious. Keep thinking they sound more like easyJet with those numbers and that was confusing me.
Anyone know?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given that Loganair are often the only commercial traffic on frequency, why on Earth have they started using alpha numeric callsigns bearing no relation to the flight number. Surely it can't be callsign confusion?
Just curious. Keep thinking they sound more like easyJet with those numbers and that was confusing me.
Anyone know?
Also are the Twin Otters not to receive FlyBe colours? The Saabs look good.
Just curious. Keep thinking they sound more like easyJet with those numbers and that was confusing me.
Anyone know?
Also are the Twin Otters not to receive FlyBe colours? The Saabs look good.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was occasionally callsign confusion, often between company aircraft. The format used now helps to minimise that, although a lot of them are tongue twisters. I think the twotters will be painted soon.
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Scotland
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Skipness this is to comply with safety advice from SRG sent to all operators some years ago discouraging the use of numerical flight numbers and promoting a numbers & letters combination to avoid RT confusion with FLs, QNHs etc.