Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

EU boost for regional airports

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

EU boost for regional airports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2005, 07:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Jes
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Isle of Thanet
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EU boost for regional airports

David Gow in Brussels
Wednesday September 7, 2005
The Guardian

The European commission yesterday gave approval for a big expansion of EU regional airports, including more than a dozen in Britain, to combat congestion at major hubs and encourage low-cost airlines. It set strict guidelines for state aid to airports handling fewer than 5 million passengers a year that enable them to hand over up to 50% of a low-cost carrier's start-up costs.
The rules arise out of a row with Ryanair, Europe's biggest low-cost carrier, over aid from the Belgian regional airport at Charleroi to persuade the airline to move there.

The EC said the deal, which saw Charleroi give Ryanair 90% of its costs over 15 years, was illegal and ordered the carrier to repay €4m (£2.7m) in a case now before the European court of justice.
Jacques Barrot, transport commissioner, said the deal had been excessive. Regional airports can now grant aid over three years to start-up airlines to cover costs such as marketing and building maintenance sheds.

The aid, limited to 50% in the first year, must not be more than 30% in total and can be broken off if the airline reaches break-even within the three years. In poorer regions, airports such as Cardiff can offer aid over five years and limit it to 40% of start-up costs. Eligible UK airports include East Midlands, Aberdeen, Prestwick, Southampton and Exeter.

This needs more research. If it applies only to new airlines it's not much use; if it applies to an airline new at an airport it looks quite good.

Edit: here's more from Forbes, that helps to answer my point.

EU Sets Rules for State Aid to Airports

The European Commission on Tuesday approved long-awaited rules governing state aid to regional airports, putting a ceiling on the percentage of costs that can be covered by public money in the establishment of carriers' new routes.

The commission, executive arm of the European Union, also said it would soon adapt rules for allocating takeoff and lading slots, computer reservation systems and baggage-handling services in a bid to boost competition among operators.

Under the new regulations, airports with fewer than 5 million passengers a year are eligible for public money. State aid must be restricted to between 30 and 50 percent of an airline's costs of starting up a new route, typically for up to three years.

Airports on the fringes of the EU or in poorer areas - where gross domestic product per capita is less than 75 percent of the EU average - can get state aid for up to five years.
Jes is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2005, 15:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,635
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Why the f**k can't the EU keep out of commercial arrangements between consenting adults?

(Providing they aren't spending taxpayers money).
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2005, 19:11
  #3 (permalink)  
Buzz off with BAF!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex England
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems the report is being given a positive response
from both Norwich and Southend airport PR people.
tilewood is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2005, 19:30
  #4 (permalink)  
LUXury is a 13,000 ft runway
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Centre of Western Europe
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the f**k can't the EU keep out of commercial arrangements between consenting adults?

(Providing they aren't spending taxpayers money).
They are - all this is about "state aids" i.e. taxpayers' money. I assume that by "consenting adults" you mean privately owned airports. Typically, these will not operate as loss leaders (although there are exceptions, HHN springs to mind), and will charge airline as much as they require to at least break even. Or they will go under. Manston anyone?
tom de luxe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.